Numerical performance of different sampling schemes in terms of run time and the number of sampled edges for DTM1.
| . | Period . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | 1 s . | 100 s . | ||
| Time (s) and no. sampled edges (million) | ||||
| MRS-1 | 204 | 4.23 | 118 | 4.24 |
| MRS-2 | 156 | 3.43 | 88 | 3.35 |
| MRS-2/MRS-1 (per cent) | 76 | 81 | 75 | 79 |
| . | Period . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | 1 s . | 100 s . | ||
| Time (s) and no. sampled edges (million) | ||||
| MRS-1 | 204 | 4.23 | 118 | 4.24 |
| MRS-2 | 156 | 3.43 | 88 | 3.35 |
| MRS-2/MRS-1 (per cent) | 76 | 81 | 75 | 79 |
Numerical performance of different sampling schemes in terms of run time and the number of sampled edges for DTM1.
| . | Period . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | 1 s . | 100 s . | ||
| Time (s) and no. sampled edges (million) | ||||
| MRS-1 | 204 | 4.23 | 118 | 4.24 |
| MRS-2 | 156 | 3.43 | 88 | 3.35 |
| MRS-2/MRS-1 (per cent) | 76 | 81 | 75 | 79 |
| . | Period . | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | 1 s . | 100 s . | ||
| Time (s) and no. sampled edges (million) | ||||
| MRS-1 | 204 | 4.23 | 118 | 4.24 |
| MRS-2 | 156 | 3.43 | 88 | 3.35 |
| MRS-2/MRS-1 (per cent) | 76 | 81 | 75 | 79 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
