Table III

Quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane for MS model.

Group comparisonNorth-east (more effective but more costly)South-west (less effective but less costly)North-west (less effective but more costly, i.e. inferior)South-east (more effective but less costly, i.e. dominant)
MS model
GnRHa plus Chemo versus Chemo86.27%8.35%0.45%4.93%
Group comparisonNorth-east (more effective but more costly)South-west (less effective but less costly)North-west (less effective but more costly, i.e. inferior)South-east (more effective but less costly, i.e. dominant)
MS model
GnRHa plus Chemo versus Chemo86.27%8.35%0.45%4.93%

Chemo, chemotherapy; GnRHa, GnRH agonist; GnRHa plus Chemo, adding GnRHa during chemotherapy; MS, menopausal symptoms.

Table III

Quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane for MS model.

Group comparisonNorth-east (more effective but more costly)South-west (less effective but less costly)North-west (less effective but more costly, i.e. inferior)South-east (more effective but less costly, i.e. dominant)
MS model
GnRHa plus Chemo versus Chemo86.27%8.35%0.45%4.93%
Group comparisonNorth-east (more effective but more costly)South-west (less effective but less costly)North-west (less effective but more costly, i.e. inferior)South-east (more effective but less costly, i.e. dominant)
MS model
GnRHa plus Chemo versus Chemo86.27%8.35%0.45%4.93%

Chemo, chemotherapy; GnRHa, GnRH agonist; GnRHa plus Chemo, adding GnRHa during chemotherapy; MS, menopausal symptoms.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close