Table 2.

Results of the postcopulatory experiments

Response variableFactorsValues (mean ± SE)dfTest statisticP
(i) Male response
(a) Probability of investing spermRelatednessR: 0.710 ± 0.083; U: 0.613 ± 0.08910.9930.319
Relative dominanceH: 0.630 ± 0.095; L: 0.686 ± 0.08010.2250.635
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.2630.608
(b) Amount of sperm investedRelatednessR: 2.14 ± 0.44; U: 1.29 ± 0.3815.8680.015
in 108 of spermRelative dominanceH: 1.26 ± 0.29; L: 2.08 ± 0.4610.5870.444
(with aspermic attempts)Relatedness: Relative dominance10.0950.758
(c) Amount of sperm investedRelatednessR: 2.32 ± 0.58; U: 1.43 ± 0.4414.5920.032
in 108 of spermRelative dominanceH: 1.11 ± 0.33; L: 2.33 ± 0.5310.7670.381
(without aspermic attempts)Relatedness: Relative dominance11.5670.211
(ii) Female response
(a) Probability of sperm ejectionRelatednessR: 0.235 ± 0.106; U: 0.150 ± 0.08210.6040.437
Relative dominanceH: 0.167 ± 0.078; L: 0.231 ± 0.12210.3910.532
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.2850.593
(b) Proportion of semen ejectedRelatednessR: 0.573 ± 0.128; U: 0.171 ± 0.0301120.057
Relative dominanceH: 0.428 ± 0.124; L: 0.363 ± 0.219180.629
(c) Number of hydrolysis pointsRelatednessR: 4.77 ± 1.10; U: 7.43 ± 2.3510.6490.426
Relative dominanceH: 8.20 ± 2.45; L: 3.81 ± 0.5910.4540.500
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.4540.500
Relatedness: Lay date13.6050.058
Response variableFactorsValues (mean ± SE)dfTest statisticP
(i) Male response
(a) Probability of investing spermRelatednessR: 0.710 ± 0.083; U: 0.613 ± 0.08910.9930.319
Relative dominanceH: 0.630 ± 0.095; L: 0.686 ± 0.08010.2250.635
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.2630.608
(b) Amount of sperm investedRelatednessR: 2.14 ± 0.44; U: 1.29 ± 0.3815.8680.015
in 108 of spermRelative dominanceH: 1.26 ± 0.29; L: 2.08 ± 0.4610.5870.444
(with aspermic attempts)Relatedness: Relative dominance10.0950.758
(c) Amount of sperm investedRelatednessR: 2.32 ± 0.58; U: 1.43 ± 0.4414.5920.032
in 108 of spermRelative dominanceH: 1.11 ± 0.33; L: 2.33 ± 0.5310.7670.381
(without aspermic attempts)Relatedness: Relative dominance11.5670.211
(ii) Female response
(a) Probability of sperm ejectionRelatednessR: 0.235 ± 0.106; U: 0.150 ± 0.08210.6040.437
Relative dominanceH: 0.167 ± 0.078; L: 0.231 ± 0.12210.3910.532
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.2850.593
(b) Proportion of semen ejectedRelatednessR: 0.573 ± 0.128; U: 0.171 ± 0.0301120.057
Relative dominanceH: 0.428 ± 0.124; L: 0.363 ± 0.219180.629
(c) Number of hydrolysis pointsRelatednessR: 4.77 ± 1.10; U: 7.43 ± 2.3510.6490.426
Relative dominanceH: 8.20 ± 2.45; L: 3.81 ± 0.5910.4540.500
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.4540.500
Relatedness: Lay date13.6050.058

R = related, U = unrelated male; H = higher, L = lower social status of the focal male compared to the first male to mate with the same female. Test statistic values are based on the χ2-distribution, except for aggression level of interruption, which is based on the Z-distribution and the proportion of semen ejected that is based on the Mann–Whitney U test statistic. P < 0.05 are highlighted in bold.

Table 2.

Results of the postcopulatory experiments

Response variableFactorsValues (mean ± SE)dfTest statisticP
(i) Male response
(a) Probability of investing spermRelatednessR: 0.710 ± 0.083; U: 0.613 ± 0.08910.9930.319
Relative dominanceH: 0.630 ± 0.095; L: 0.686 ± 0.08010.2250.635
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.2630.608
(b) Amount of sperm investedRelatednessR: 2.14 ± 0.44; U: 1.29 ± 0.3815.8680.015
in 108 of spermRelative dominanceH: 1.26 ± 0.29; L: 2.08 ± 0.4610.5870.444
(with aspermic attempts)Relatedness: Relative dominance10.0950.758
(c) Amount of sperm investedRelatednessR: 2.32 ± 0.58; U: 1.43 ± 0.4414.5920.032
in 108 of spermRelative dominanceH: 1.11 ± 0.33; L: 2.33 ± 0.5310.7670.381
(without aspermic attempts)Relatedness: Relative dominance11.5670.211
(ii) Female response
(a) Probability of sperm ejectionRelatednessR: 0.235 ± 0.106; U: 0.150 ± 0.08210.6040.437
Relative dominanceH: 0.167 ± 0.078; L: 0.231 ± 0.12210.3910.532
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.2850.593
(b) Proportion of semen ejectedRelatednessR: 0.573 ± 0.128; U: 0.171 ± 0.0301120.057
Relative dominanceH: 0.428 ± 0.124; L: 0.363 ± 0.219180.629
(c) Number of hydrolysis pointsRelatednessR: 4.77 ± 1.10; U: 7.43 ± 2.3510.6490.426
Relative dominanceH: 8.20 ± 2.45; L: 3.81 ± 0.5910.4540.500
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.4540.500
Relatedness: Lay date13.6050.058
Response variableFactorsValues (mean ± SE)dfTest statisticP
(i) Male response
(a) Probability of investing spermRelatednessR: 0.710 ± 0.083; U: 0.613 ± 0.08910.9930.319
Relative dominanceH: 0.630 ± 0.095; L: 0.686 ± 0.08010.2250.635
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.2630.608
(b) Amount of sperm investedRelatednessR: 2.14 ± 0.44; U: 1.29 ± 0.3815.8680.015
in 108 of spermRelative dominanceH: 1.26 ± 0.29; L: 2.08 ± 0.4610.5870.444
(with aspermic attempts)Relatedness: Relative dominance10.0950.758
(c) Amount of sperm investedRelatednessR: 2.32 ± 0.58; U: 1.43 ± 0.4414.5920.032
in 108 of spermRelative dominanceH: 1.11 ± 0.33; L: 2.33 ± 0.5310.7670.381
(without aspermic attempts)Relatedness: Relative dominance11.5670.211
(ii) Female response
(a) Probability of sperm ejectionRelatednessR: 0.235 ± 0.106; U: 0.150 ± 0.08210.6040.437
Relative dominanceH: 0.167 ± 0.078; L: 0.231 ± 0.12210.3910.532
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.2850.593
(b) Proportion of semen ejectedRelatednessR: 0.573 ± 0.128; U: 0.171 ± 0.0301120.057
Relative dominanceH: 0.428 ± 0.124; L: 0.363 ± 0.219180.629
(c) Number of hydrolysis pointsRelatednessR: 4.77 ± 1.10; U: 7.43 ± 2.3510.6490.426
Relative dominanceH: 8.20 ± 2.45; L: 3.81 ± 0.5910.4540.500
Relatedness: Relative dominance10.4540.500
Relatedness: Lay date13.6050.058

R = related, U = unrelated male; H = higher, L = lower social status of the focal male compared to the first male to mate with the same female. Test statistic values are based on the χ2-distribution, except for aggression level of interruption, which is based on the Z-distribution and the proportion of semen ejected that is based on the Mann–Whitney U test statistic. P < 0.05 are highlighted in bold.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close