| Respondents (n=73) | ILCOR recommendation 2015 | |||
| Debriefing | ||||
| Trust runs formal programme for staff feedback/debriefing on their performance following IHCA, n (%) | ||||
| Yes – for every arrest | 4 (5.5) | We recommend data-driven, performance-focused debriefing of rescuers after IHCA in both adults and children’ (strong recommendation) | ||
| Yes – for some arrests | 36 (49.3) | |||
| Unsure | 2 (2.7) | |||
| No | 31 (42.5) | |||
| Types of feedback/debriefing offered to staff, n (%) | ||||
| Hot debrief (without CPR quality data) | 33 (82.5) | |||
| Hot debrief (with CPR quality data) | 3 (7.5) | |||
| Cold debrief (without CPR quality data) | 26 (65.0) | |||
| Cold debrief (with CPR quality data) | 7 (17.5) | |||
| Written feedback (without CPR quality data) | 5 (12.5) | |||
| Written feedback (with CPR quality data) | 2 (5.0) | |||
| Focus of debrief (1, not important to 5, key focus) | ||||
| Education/quality of care issues, median (IQR) | 4 (4—5) | |||
| Psychological/emotional issues, median (IQR) | 4 (4—5) | |||
| Quality Improvement | ||||
| Quality improvement strategies in use at hospitals, n (%) | ||||
| Participation in National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) | 66 (90.4) | ‘We suggest the use of performance measurement and quality improvement initiatives in organisations that treat cardiac arrest’ (weak recommendation) | ||
| Patient outcome review | 49 (67.1) | |||
| CPR quality review | 21 (28.8) | |||
| Rolling CPR refreshers | 49 (67.1) | |||
| In situ cardiac arrest simulation | 52 (71.2) | |||
| Real-time CPR feedback | 21 (28.8) | |||
| Debriefing | 41 (56.2) | |||
| DNAR documentation audit/review | 66 (90.4) | |||
| Incident reporting review | 57 (78.1) | |||
| Resuscitation equipment provision/audit | 67 (91.8) | |||
| Respondents (n=73) | ILCOR recommendation 2015 | |||
| Debriefing | ||||
| Trust runs formal programme for staff feedback/debriefing on their performance following IHCA, n (%) | ||||
| Yes – for every arrest | 4 (5.5) | We recommend data-driven, performance-focused debriefing of rescuers after IHCA in both adults and children’ (strong recommendation) | ||
| Yes – for some arrests | 36 (49.3) | |||
| Unsure | 2 (2.7) | |||
| No | 31 (42.5) | |||
| Types of feedback/debriefing offered to staff, n (%) | ||||
| Hot debrief (without CPR quality data) | 33 (82.5) | |||
| Hot debrief (with CPR quality data) | 3 (7.5) | |||
| Cold debrief (without CPR quality data) | 26 (65.0) | |||
| Cold debrief (with CPR quality data) | 7 (17.5) | |||
| Written feedback (without CPR quality data) | 5 (12.5) | |||
| Written feedback (with CPR quality data) | 2 (5.0) | |||
| Focus of debrief (1, not important to 5, key focus) | ||||
| Education/quality of care issues, median (IQR) | 4 (4—5) | |||
| Psychological/emotional issues, median (IQR) | 4 (4—5) | |||
| Quality Improvement | ||||
| Quality improvement strategies in use at hospitals, n (%) | ||||
| Participation in National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) | 66 (90.4) | ‘We suggest the use of performance measurement and quality improvement initiatives in organisations that treat cardiac arrest’ (weak recommendation) | ||
| Patient outcome review | 49 (67.1) | |||
| CPR quality review | 21 (28.8) | |||
| Rolling CPR refreshers | 49 (67.1) | |||
| In situ cardiac arrest simulation | 52 (71.2) | |||
| Real-time CPR feedback | 21 (28.8) | |||
| Debriefing | 41 (56.2) | |||
| DNAR documentation audit/review | 66 (90.4) | |||
| Incident reporting review | 57 (78.1) | |||
| Resuscitation equipment provision/audit | 67 (91.8) | |||
DNAR, Do Not Attempt Resuscitation; ILCOR, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.
| Respondents (n=73) | ILCOR recommendation 2015 | |||
| Debriefing | ||||
| Trust runs formal programme for staff feedback/debriefing on their performance following IHCA, n (%) | ||||
| Yes – for every arrest | 4 (5.5) | We recommend data-driven, performance-focused debriefing of rescuers after IHCA in both adults and children’ (strong recommendation) | ||
| Yes – for some arrests | 36 (49.3) | |||
| Unsure | 2 (2.7) | |||
| No | 31 (42.5) | |||
| Types of feedback/debriefing offered to staff, n (%) | ||||
| Hot debrief (without CPR quality data) | 33 (82.5) | |||
| Hot debrief (with CPR quality data) | 3 (7.5) | |||
| Cold debrief (without CPR quality data) | 26 (65.0) | |||
| Cold debrief (with CPR quality data) | 7 (17.5) | |||
| Written feedback (without CPR quality data) | 5 (12.5) | |||
| Written feedback (with CPR quality data) | 2 (5.0) | |||
| Focus of debrief (1, not important to 5, key focus) | ||||
| Education/quality of care issues, median (IQR) | 4 (4—5) | |||
| Psychological/emotional issues, median (IQR) | 4 (4—5) | |||
| Quality Improvement | ||||
| Quality improvement strategies in use at hospitals, n (%) | ||||
| Participation in National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) | 66 (90.4) | ‘We suggest the use of performance measurement and quality improvement initiatives in organisations that treat cardiac arrest’ (weak recommendation) | ||
| Patient outcome review | 49 (67.1) | |||
| CPR quality review | 21 (28.8) | |||
| Rolling CPR refreshers | 49 (67.1) | |||
| In situ cardiac arrest simulation | 52 (71.2) | |||
| Real-time CPR feedback | 21 (28.8) | |||
| Debriefing | 41 (56.2) | |||
| DNAR documentation audit/review | 66 (90.4) | |||
| Incident reporting review | 57 (78.1) | |||
| Resuscitation equipment provision/audit | 67 (91.8) | |||
| Respondents (n=73) | ILCOR recommendation 2015 | |||
| Debriefing | ||||
| Trust runs formal programme for staff feedback/debriefing on their performance following IHCA, n (%) | ||||
| Yes – for every arrest | 4 (5.5) | We recommend data-driven, performance-focused debriefing of rescuers after IHCA in both adults and children’ (strong recommendation) | ||
| Yes – for some arrests | 36 (49.3) | |||
| Unsure | 2 (2.7) | |||
| No | 31 (42.5) | |||
| Types of feedback/debriefing offered to staff, n (%) | ||||
| Hot debrief (without CPR quality data) | 33 (82.5) | |||
| Hot debrief (with CPR quality data) | 3 (7.5) | |||
| Cold debrief (without CPR quality data) | 26 (65.0) | |||
| Cold debrief (with CPR quality data) | 7 (17.5) | |||
| Written feedback (without CPR quality data) | 5 (12.5) | |||
| Written feedback (with CPR quality data) | 2 (5.0) | |||
| Focus of debrief (1, not important to 5, key focus) | ||||
| Education/quality of care issues, median (IQR) | 4 (4—5) | |||
| Psychological/emotional issues, median (IQR) | 4 (4—5) | |||
| Quality Improvement | ||||
| Quality improvement strategies in use at hospitals, n (%) | ||||
| Participation in National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) | 66 (90.4) | ‘We suggest the use of performance measurement and quality improvement initiatives in organisations that treat cardiac arrest’ (weak recommendation) | ||
| Patient outcome review | 49 (67.1) | |||
| CPR quality review | 21 (28.8) | |||
| Rolling CPR refreshers | 49 (67.1) | |||
| In situ cardiac arrest simulation | 52 (71.2) | |||
| Real-time CPR feedback | 21 (28.8) | |||
| Debriefing | 41 (56.2) | |||
| DNAR documentation audit/review | 66 (90.4) | |||
| Incident reporting review | 57 (78.1) | |||
| Resuscitation equipment provision/audit | 67 (91.8) | |||
DNAR, Do Not Attempt Resuscitation; ILCOR, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
