Table 2

Summary of findings for changes in six categories of measurement error by four level-of-effort measures

Results for the following levels of recruitment effort paradata:
Follow-up attemptsRefusal conversionDate of interviewCombination
Question-specific item non-responseStrong evidence for higher item non-response rates (16 studies)Strong evidence for higher item non-response rates (7 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)Weak evidence for higher item non-response rates (2 studies)
Aggregate item non-responseWeak evidence for higher item non-response rates (15 studies)Strong evidence for higher item non-response rates (11 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)
AccuracyWeak evidence for less accurate responses (6 studies)No clear difference (3 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Scale reliabilityNo clear difference (2 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)
Variability in answersClear evidence of difference, but not on direction (4 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Measurement error—attitudinal questionsNo clear difference (5 studies)No clear difference (3 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Results for the following levels of recruitment effort paradata:
Follow-up attemptsRefusal conversionDate of interviewCombination
Question-specific item non-responseStrong evidence for higher item non-response rates (16 studies)Strong evidence for higher item non-response rates (7 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)Weak evidence for higher item non-response rates (2 studies)
Aggregate item non-responseWeak evidence for higher item non-response rates (15 studies)Strong evidence for higher item non-response rates (11 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)
AccuracyWeak evidence for less accurate responses (6 studies)No clear difference (3 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Scale reliabilityNo clear difference (2 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)
Variability in answersClear evidence of difference, but not on direction (4 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Measurement error—attitudinal questionsNo clear difference (5 studies)No clear difference (3 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)

‘No available evidence’ indicates that, at the time of writing, no empirical studies have examined this combination of level of effort and the measurement error indicator. ‘No clear difference’ indicates that there are empirical studies, but there is no clear evidence of a difference between high and low effort respondents.

Table 2

Summary of findings for changes in six categories of measurement error by four level-of-effort measures

Results for the following levels of recruitment effort paradata:
Follow-up attemptsRefusal conversionDate of interviewCombination
Question-specific item non-responseStrong evidence for higher item non-response rates (16 studies)Strong evidence for higher item non-response rates (7 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)Weak evidence for higher item non-response rates (2 studies)
Aggregate item non-responseWeak evidence for higher item non-response rates (15 studies)Strong evidence for higher item non-response rates (11 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)
AccuracyWeak evidence for less accurate responses (6 studies)No clear difference (3 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Scale reliabilityNo clear difference (2 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)
Variability in answersClear evidence of difference, but not on direction (4 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Measurement error—attitudinal questionsNo clear difference (5 studies)No clear difference (3 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Results for the following levels of recruitment effort paradata:
Follow-up attemptsRefusal conversionDate of interviewCombination
Question-specific item non-responseStrong evidence for higher item non-response rates (16 studies)Strong evidence for higher item non-response rates (7 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)Weak evidence for higher item non-response rates (2 studies)
Aggregate item non-responseWeak evidence for higher item non-response rates (15 studies)Strong evidence for higher item non-response rates (11 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)
AccuracyWeak evidence for less accurate responses (6 studies)No clear difference (3 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Scale reliabilityNo clear difference (2 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)No available evidence (0 studies)
Variability in answersClear evidence of difference, but not on direction (4 studies)No clear difference (2 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)
Measurement error—attitudinal questionsNo clear difference (5 studies)No clear difference (3 studies)No clear difference (1 study)No available evidence (0 studies)

‘No available evidence’ indicates that, at the time of writing, no empirical studies have examined this combination of level of effort and the measurement error indicator. ‘No clear difference’ indicates that there are empirical studies, but there is no clear evidence of a difference between high and low effort respondents.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close