Table 1

Photosynthetic and physiological parameters measured on leaves of wild-type (WT) S. viridis and two transgenic lines overexpressing SBPase at growth light intensity.

ParameterWTLine 2Line 3
Relative chlorophyll (SPAD)43.57 ± 0.8342.02 ± 1.1843.00 ± 0.95
Starch content (g m−2)0.42 ± 0.150.69 ± 0.260.41 ± 0.05
Leaf thickness (mm)0.59 ± 0.080.64 ± 0.070.58 ± 0.09
Aboveground biomass, g (DW) plant-10.24 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.050.28 ± 0.03
PhiPSII0.62 ± 0.010.62 ± 0.010.63 ± 0.02
PhiNO0.21 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.01
PhiNPQ0.17 ± 0.010.18 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.01
gH+240.4 ± 18.2239.4 ± 7.2255.1 ± 15.2
ParameterWTLine 2Line 3
Relative chlorophyll (SPAD)43.57 ± 0.8342.02 ± 1.1843.00 ± 0.95
Starch content (g m−2)0.42 ± 0.150.69 ± 0.260.41 ± 0.05
Leaf thickness (mm)0.59 ± 0.080.64 ± 0.070.58 ± 0.09
Aboveground biomass, g (DW) plant-10.24 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.050.28 ± 0.03
PhiPSII0.62 ± 0.010.62 ± 0.010.63 ± 0.02
PhiNO0.21 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.01
PhiNPQ0.17 ± 0.010.18 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.01
gH+240.4 ± 18.2239.4 ± 7.2255.1 ± 15.2

SPAD, soil plant analysis development; DW, dry weight; PhiPSII, the effective quantum yield of Photosystem II; PhiNPQ, the yield of non-photochemical quenching; PhiNO, the yield of non-regulated non-photochemical reactions in PSII; gH+, proton conductivity of the thylakoid membrane. Mean ± Se, n = 6–7 biological replicates. No statistically significant differences were found between transgenic and WT plants (P < 0.05, t test).

Table 1

Photosynthetic and physiological parameters measured on leaves of wild-type (WT) S. viridis and two transgenic lines overexpressing SBPase at growth light intensity.

ParameterWTLine 2Line 3
Relative chlorophyll (SPAD)43.57 ± 0.8342.02 ± 1.1843.00 ± 0.95
Starch content (g m−2)0.42 ± 0.150.69 ± 0.260.41 ± 0.05
Leaf thickness (mm)0.59 ± 0.080.64 ± 0.070.58 ± 0.09
Aboveground biomass, g (DW) plant-10.24 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.050.28 ± 0.03
PhiPSII0.62 ± 0.010.62 ± 0.010.63 ± 0.02
PhiNO0.21 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.01
PhiNPQ0.17 ± 0.010.18 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.01
gH+240.4 ± 18.2239.4 ± 7.2255.1 ± 15.2
ParameterWTLine 2Line 3
Relative chlorophyll (SPAD)43.57 ± 0.8342.02 ± 1.1843.00 ± 0.95
Starch content (g m−2)0.42 ± 0.150.69 ± 0.260.41 ± 0.05
Leaf thickness (mm)0.59 ± 0.080.64 ± 0.070.58 ± 0.09
Aboveground biomass, g (DW) plant-10.24 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.050.28 ± 0.03
PhiPSII0.62 ± 0.010.62 ± 0.010.63 ± 0.02
PhiNO0.21 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.01
PhiNPQ0.17 ± 0.010.18 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.01
gH+240.4 ± 18.2239.4 ± 7.2255.1 ± 15.2

SPAD, soil plant analysis development; DW, dry weight; PhiPSII, the effective quantum yield of Photosystem II; PhiNPQ, the yield of non-photochemical quenching; PhiNO, the yield of non-regulated non-photochemical reactions in PSII; gH+, proton conductivity of the thylakoid membrane. Mean ± Se, n = 6–7 biological replicates. No statistically significant differences were found between transgenic and WT plants (P < 0.05, t test).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close