Estimated Relationship Between Highest Level of American Football Played and Diagnosis of CTE, After Adjustment for Selection Bias, When CTE Is Conditioned on Death (Sensitivity Analyses) Among Brain Donors From the VA-BU-CLF Brain Bank, 2008–2019
Highest Level of Playa . | Selection-Bias–Adjusted Estimateb . | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mean RR . | 95% SI . | Median RR . | |
Collegec | |||
Upwards | 2.33 | 1.28, 5.17 | 2.01 |
Downwards | 1.97 | 0.58, 4.87 | 1.72 |
No relationship between probabilities | 2.11 | 0.58, 5.50 | 1.77 |
Initially randomly selecting a probability | 2.25 | 0.84, 5.50 | 1.93 |
Professionalc | |||
Upwards | 2.43 | 1.51, 4.33 | 2.25 |
Downwards | 2.20 | 0.99,4.21 | 2.05 |
No relationship between probabilities | 2.24 | 1.05, 4.30 | 2.07 |
Initially randomly selecting a probability | 2.38 | 1.26, 4.52 | 2.19 |
Highest Level of Playa . | Selection-Bias–Adjusted Estimateb . | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mean RR . | 95% SI . | Median RR . | |
Collegec | |||
Upwards | 2.33 | 1.28, 5.17 | 2.01 |
Downwards | 1.97 | 0.58, 4.87 | 1.72 |
No relationship between probabilities | 2.11 | 0.58, 5.50 | 1.77 |
Initially randomly selecting a probability | 2.25 | 0.84, 5.50 | 1.93 |
Professionalc | |||
Upwards | 2.43 | 1.51, 4.33 | 2.25 |
Downwards | 2.20 | 0.99,4.21 | 2.05 |
No relationship between probabilities | 2.24 | 1.05, 4.30 | 2.07 |
Initially randomly selecting a probability | 2.38 | 1.26, 4.52 | 2.19 |
Abbreviations: CTE, chronic traumatic encephalopathy; RR, risk ratio; SI, simulation interval; VA-BU-CLF, Veterans Affairs–Boston University–Concussion Legacy Foundation.
a Sampling schemes were implemented as follows: 1) by first sampling the smallest conditional selection probability in the imposed inequality and iterating upwards; 2) by first sampling the largest conditional selection probability in the imposed inequality and iterating downwards; 3) by assuming no hierarchical relationship between the conditional selection probabilities and drawing each from the prespecified bounds, independently of all other probabilities; and 4) by first randomly selecting a conditional selection probability and then sampling according to its plausible bounds, and then sampling the remaining conditional selection probabilities in order to maintain the inequality.
b The adjusted RR estimate is the sample mean (and median) of the sampling distribution; the 95% SI was constructed from the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the sampling distribution.
c Referent: high school (RR = 1).
Estimated Relationship Between Highest Level of American Football Played and Diagnosis of CTE, After Adjustment for Selection Bias, When CTE Is Conditioned on Death (Sensitivity Analyses) Among Brain Donors From the VA-BU-CLF Brain Bank, 2008–2019
Highest Level of Playa . | Selection-Bias–Adjusted Estimateb . | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mean RR . | 95% SI . | Median RR . | |
Collegec | |||
Upwards | 2.33 | 1.28, 5.17 | 2.01 |
Downwards | 1.97 | 0.58, 4.87 | 1.72 |
No relationship between probabilities | 2.11 | 0.58, 5.50 | 1.77 |
Initially randomly selecting a probability | 2.25 | 0.84, 5.50 | 1.93 |
Professionalc | |||
Upwards | 2.43 | 1.51, 4.33 | 2.25 |
Downwards | 2.20 | 0.99,4.21 | 2.05 |
No relationship between probabilities | 2.24 | 1.05, 4.30 | 2.07 |
Initially randomly selecting a probability | 2.38 | 1.26, 4.52 | 2.19 |
Highest Level of Playa . | Selection-Bias–Adjusted Estimateb . | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mean RR . | 95% SI . | Median RR . | |
Collegec | |||
Upwards | 2.33 | 1.28, 5.17 | 2.01 |
Downwards | 1.97 | 0.58, 4.87 | 1.72 |
No relationship between probabilities | 2.11 | 0.58, 5.50 | 1.77 |
Initially randomly selecting a probability | 2.25 | 0.84, 5.50 | 1.93 |
Professionalc | |||
Upwards | 2.43 | 1.51, 4.33 | 2.25 |
Downwards | 2.20 | 0.99,4.21 | 2.05 |
No relationship between probabilities | 2.24 | 1.05, 4.30 | 2.07 |
Initially randomly selecting a probability | 2.38 | 1.26, 4.52 | 2.19 |
Abbreviations: CTE, chronic traumatic encephalopathy; RR, risk ratio; SI, simulation interval; VA-BU-CLF, Veterans Affairs–Boston University–Concussion Legacy Foundation.
a Sampling schemes were implemented as follows: 1) by first sampling the smallest conditional selection probability in the imposed inequality and iterating upwards; 2) by first sampling the largest conditional selection probability in the imposed inequality and iterating downwards; 3) by assuming no hierarchical relationship between the conditional selection probabilities and drawing each from the prespecified bounds, independently of all other probabilities; and 4) by first randomly selecting a conditional selection probability and then sampling according to its plausible bounds, and then sampling the remaining conditional selection probabilities in order to maintain the inequality.
b The adjusted RR estimate is the sample mean (and median) of the sampling distribution; the 95% SI was constructed from the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the sampling distribution.
c Referent: high school (RR = 1).
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.