Table 2.

Performance of the LoopIng method on the FREAD benchmark

Loop lengthOriginal FREAD
LoopIng
LEAP
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
41.29*1.140.610.550.39*0.23
52.19*2.020.680.520.40*0.27
61.79*1.371.010.630.49*0.33
72.53*2.341.260.90.69*0.38
82.88*2.371.471.070.68*0.56
93.08*2.601.711.230.93*0.69
104.25*3.581.901.341.440.84
114.55*3.631.931.482.241.08
123.99*3.882.201.703.142.52
135.54*4.252.391.852.912.62
146.07*4.362.533.034.44*3.70
156.41*5.053.053.004.584.16
167.50*6.152.823.174.90*4.43
177.84*5.273.033.155.66*5.50
185.485.643.863.476.53*6.30
197.67*5.273.893.515.874.64
207.64*6.433.913.498.21*7.82
Loop lengthOriginal FREAD
LoopIng
LEAP
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
41.29*1.140.610.550.39*0.23
52.19*2.020.680.520.40*0.27
61.79*1.371.010.630.49*0.33
72.53*2.341.260.90.69*0.38
82.88*2.371.471.070.68*0.56
93.08*2.601.711.230.93*0.69
104.25*3.581.901.341.440.84
114.55*3.631.931.482.241.08
123.99*3.882.201.703.142.52
135.54*4.252.391.852.912.62
146.07*4.362.533.034.44*3.70
156.41*5.053.053.004.584.16
167.50*6.152.823.174.90*4.43
177.84*5.273.033.155.66*5.50
185.485.643.863.476.53*6.30
197.67*5.273.893.515.874.64
207.64*6.433.913.498.21*7.82

For each length range the number of tested loops is 30. The columns report the average and standard deviation RMSD values measured between the model and native loop backbone conformations. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (95% confidence level) based on an unpaired t-test with respect to the LoopIng model. Underlined values represent the best results between LoopIng and LEAP. The values reported in the FREAD and LEAP columns are taken from Choi and Deane (2010) and Liang et al. (2014), respectively.

Table 2.

Performance of the LoopIng method on the FREAD benchmark

Loop lengthOriginal FREAD
LoopIng
LEAP
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
41.29*1.140.610.550.39*0.23
52.19*2.020.680.520.40*0.27
61.79*1.371.010.630.49*0.33
72.53*2.341.260.90.69*0.38
82.88*2.371.471.070.68*0.56
93.08*2.601.711.230.93*0.69
104.25*3.581.901.341.440.84
114.55*3.631.931.482.241.08
123.99*3.882.201.703.142.52
135.54*4.252.391.852.912.62
146.07*4.362.533.034.44*3.70
156.41*5.053.053.004.584.16
167.50*6.152.823.174.90*4.43
177.84*5.273.033.155.66*5.50
185.485.643.863.476.53*6.30
197.67*5.273.893.515.874.64
207.64*6.433.913.498.21*7.82
Loop lengthOriginal FREAD
LoopIng
LEAP
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
41.29*1.140.610.550.39*0.23
52.19*2.020.680.520.40*0.27
61.79*1.371.010.630.49*0.33
72.53*2.341.260.90.69*0.38
82.88*2.371.471.070.68*0.56
93.08*2.601.711.230.93*0.69
104.25*3.581.901.341.440.84
114.55*3.631.931.482.241.08
123.99*3.882.201.703.142.52
135.54*4.252.391.852.912.62
146.07*4.362.533.034.44*3.70
156.41*5.053.053.004.584.16
167.50*6.152.823.174.90*4.43
177.84*5.273.033.155.66*5.50
185.485.643.863.476.53*6.30
197.67*5.273.893.515.874.64
207.64*6.433.913.498.21*7.82

For each length range the number of tested loops is 30. The columns report the average and standard deviation RMSD values measured between the model and native loop backbone conformations. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (95% confidence level) based on an unpaired t-test with respect to the LoopIng model. Underlined values represent the best results between LoopIng and LEAP. The values reported in the FREAD and LEAP columns are taken from Choi and Deane (2010) and Liang et al. (2014), respectively.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close