Performance comparison between GraLTR-LDA* and GraLTR-LDA on |${\mathbb{S}}_{\mathrm{independent}}$|.
| . | GraLTR-LDA* . | GraLTR-LDA . |
|---|---|---|
| AUC | 0.7509 | 0.8352 |
| AUPR | 0.2426 | 0.3597 |
| NDCG@10 | 0.3599 | 0.5216 |
| . | GraLTR-LDA* . | GraLTR-LDA . |
|---|---|---|
| AUC | 0.7509 | 0.8352 |
| AUPR | 0.2426 | 0.3597 |
| NDCG@10 | 0.3599 | 0.5216 |
Performance comparison between GraLTR-LDA* and GraLTR-LDA on |${\mathbb{S}}_{\mathrm{independent}}$|.
| . | GraLTR-LDA* . | GraLTR-LDA . |
|---|---|---|
| AUC | 0.7509 | 0.8352 |
| AUPR | 0.2426 | 0.3597 |
| NDCG@10 | 0.3599 | 0.5216 |
| . | GraLTR-LDA* . | GraLTR-LDA . |
|---|---|---|
| AUC | 0.7509 | 0.8352 |
| AUPR | 0.2426 | 0.3597 |
| NDCG@10 | 0.3599 | 0.5216 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
