Table 2 Open in new tab The performance...

Table 2

The performance comparison between GraLTR-LDA and the other methods on |${\mathbb{S}}_{\mathrm{independent}}$|⁠.

Methods	AUC	AUPR	NDCG@10
LDASR	0.7342	0.2716	0.3970
LDNFSGB	0.7520	0.2304	0.3640
IPCARF	0.7956	0.3423	0.4682
SIMCLDA	0.7535	0.1784	0.3135
NCPLDA	0.8198	0.3680	0.4724
DMFLDA	0.7856	0.3004	0.4305
VAGELDA	0.7245	0.3173	0.4159
GCRFLDA	0.7690	0.3267	0.4219
GANLDA	0.7149	0.2872	0.4006
iLncDA-LTR	0.7805	0.3174	0.4264
GraLTR-LDA	0.8352	0.3597	0.5216

Methods	AUC	AUPR	NDCG@10
LDASR	0.7342	0.2716	0.3970
LDNFSGB	0.7520	0.2304	0.3640
IPCARF	0.7956	0.3423	0.4682
SIMCLDA	0.7535	0.1784	0.3135
NCPLDA	0.8198	0.3680	0.4724
DMFLDA	0.7856	0.3004	0.4305
VAGELDA	0.7245	0.3173	0.4159
GCRFLDA	0.7690	0.3267	0.4219
GANLDA	0.7149	0.2872	0.4006
iLncDA-LTR	0.7805	0.3174	0.4264
GraLTR-LDA	0.8352	0.3597	0.5216

Note: These comparison methods are reproduced based on [15, 16, 18–21, 24–26, 38].