Comparison of F1-Score between the HIWL and two literature works based on the validation set. Each of these works focuses on the recognition of CRS, IBS, CSS, EO, and SPI.
Method . | F1-Score . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | CRS . | IBS . | CSS . | EO . | SPI . |
ResNet26 (Zhu et al. 2019) | 0.9622 | 0.9495 | 0.6476 | 0.9448 | 0.9677 |
NODE_ACA (Gupta et al. 2022) | 0.9607 | 0.9208 | 0.5412 | 0.9233 | 0.9414 |
HIWL | 0.9762 | 0.9679 | 0.7679 | 0.9693 | 0.9885 |
Method . | F1-Score . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | CRS . | IBS . | CSS . | EO . | SPI . |
ResNet26 (Zhu et al. 2019) | 0.9622 | 0.9495 | 0.6476 | 0.9448 | 0.9677 |
NODE_ACA (Gupta et al. 2022) | 0.9607 | 0.9208 | 0.5412 | 0.9233 | 0.9414 |
HIWL | 0.9762 | 0.9679 | 0.7679 | 0.9693 | 0.9885 |
Comparison of F1-Score between the HIWL and two literature works based on the validation set. Each of these works focuses on the recognition of CRS, IBS, CSS, EO, and SPI.
Method . | F1-Score . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | CRS . | IBS . | CSS . | EO . | SPI . |
ResNet26 (Zhu et al. 2019) | 0.9622 | 0.9495 | 0.6476 | 0.9448 | 0.9677 |
NODE_ACA (Gupta et al. 2022) | 0.9607 | 0.9208 | 0.5412 | 0.9233 | 0.9414 |
HIWL | 0.9762 | 0.9679 | 0.7679 | 0.9693 | 0.9885 |
Method . | F1-Score . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | CRS . | IBS . | CSS . | EO . | SPI . |
ResNet26 (Zhu et al. 2019) | 0.9622 | 0.9495 | 0.6476 | 0.9448 | 0.9677 |
NODE_ACA (Gupta et al. 2022) | 0.9607 | 0.9208 | 0.5412 | 0.9233 | 0.9414 |
HIWL | 0.9762 | 0.9679 | 0.7679 | 0.9693 | 0.9885 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.