Table 6.

The desirability of using a label smoothing mechanism. This evaluation on the test set is conducted by comparing the HIWL with a simpler model HMWS. The HMWS is designed by removing the label smoothing mechanism from HIWL.

HIWLHMWS
RecallOverall accRecallOverall acc
CRS0.963396.32 per cent0.966896.04 per cent
IBS0.96280.9616
CSS0.70690.6724
EO0.96160.9437
SPI0.98340.9821
HIWLHMWS
RecallOverall accRecallOverall acc
CRS0.963396.32 per cent0.966896.04 per cent
IBS0.96280.9616
CSS0.70690.6724
EO0.96160.9437
SPI0.98340.9821
Table 6.

The desirability of using a label smoothing mechanism. This evaluation on the test set is conducted by comparing the HIWL with a simpler model HMWS. The HMWS is designed by removing the label smoothing mechanism from HIWL.

HIWLHMWS
RecallOverall accRecallOverall acc
CRS0.963396.32 per cent0.966896.04 per cent
IBS0.96280.9616
CSS0.70690.6724
EO0.96160.9437
SPI0.98340.9821
HIWLHMWS
RecallOverall accRecallOverall acc
CRS0.963396.32 per cent0.966896.04 per cent
IBS0.96280.9616
CSS0.70690.6724
EO0.96160.9437
SPI0.98340.9821
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close