Table 4.
Open in new tab

Study Comparisons

ParameterBass and Doherty, 201830Waibel et al, 202012Current study
(FDA clearance)(FDA clearance)
Device typeContact 1060-nm laserNoncontact 1064-nm laserNoncontact 1064-nm laser
Cooling systemContact, chilled waterNoncontact air jetNoncontact air jet
Temperature control systemManual, patient feedbackAutomaticAutomatic
Sample size353626
Mean treatment time per segment, minutes251520
Week 12 mean fat reduction, mm–2.65–3.4–6.3
Overall subject satisfaction83%89%96%
Subjects with nodules, n (%)8 (23)4 (11.1)1 (3.9)
ParameterBass and Doherty, 201830Waibel et al, 202012Current study
(FDA clearance)(FDA clearance)
Device typeContact 1060-nm laserNoncontact 1064-nm laserNoncontact 1064-nm laser
Cooling systemContact, chilled waterNoncontact air jetNoncontact air jet
Temperature control systemManual, patient feedbackAutomaticAutomatic
Sample size353626
Mean treatment time per segment, minutes251520
Week 12 mean fat reduction, mm–2.65–3.4–6.3
Overall subject satisfaction83%89%96%
Subjects with nodules, n (%)8 (23)4 (11.1)1 (3.9)
Table 4.
Open in new tab

Study Comparisons

ParameterBass and Doherty, 201830Waibel et al, 202012Current study
(FDA clearance)(FDA clearance)
Device typeContact 1060-nm laserNoncontact 1064-nm laserNoncontact 1064-nm laser
Cooling systemContact, chilled waterNoncontact air jetNoncontact air jet
Temperature control systemManual, patient feedbackAutomaticAutomatic
Sample size353626
Mean treatment time per segment, minutes251520
Week 12 mean fat reduction, mm–2.65–3.4–6.3
Overall subject satisfaction83%89%96%
Subjects with nodules, n (%)8 (23)4 (11.1)1 (3.9)
ParameterBass and Doherty, 201830Waibel et al, 202012Current study
(FDA clearance)(FDA clearance)
Device typeContact 1060-nm laserNoncontact 1064-nm laserNoncontact 1064-nm laser
Cooling systemContact, chilled waterNoncontact air jetNoncontact air jet
Temperature control systemManual, patient feedbackAutomaticAutomatic
Sample size353626
Mean treatment time per segment, minutes251520
Week 12 mean fat reduction, mm–2.65–3.4–6.3
Overall subject satisfaction83%89%96%
Subjects with nodules, n (%)8 (23)4 (11.1)1 (3.9)
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close