Table 8.

Studies evaluating daptomycin in combination with oxazolidinones

StrainYear and countryNumber of isolatesResistance (%)In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection)Partner drugSynergistic effect (%)Additive effect (%)Indifferent effect (%)Antagonistic effect (%)CommentsReference
SA2006, USA2GISA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)LinezolidET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100)15
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Linezolid1 (50)1 (50)DNS isolates. High inoculum tested.19
SA2012, Spain3MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model of biofilm)Linezolid2 (66.7)1 (33.3)Neither DAP nor linezolid alone were active against biofilm-embedded bacteria, while the combination was active against both planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacteria.75
E. faecalis2014, Switzerland3VRE (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Linezolid3 (100)76
E. faecium4VRE (100)Linezolid1 (33.3)1 (33.3)2 (33.3)
SA2015, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD biofilm model)Linezolid2 (100)77
SA2016, Denmark1in vivo (mouse, implant-associated osteomyelitis)Linezolid1 (100)Equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered.70
SA2017, Turkey30MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Linezolid20 (67)10 (33)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect.71
SA2018, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Tedizolid2 (100)78
SA2019, Taiwan100MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Linezolid3 (3)74 (74)23 (23)No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect.30
StrainYear and countryNumber of isolatesResistance (%)In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection)Partner drugSynergistic effect (%)Additive effect (%)Indifferent effect (%)Antagonistic effect (%)CommentsReference
SA2006, USA2GISA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)LinezolidET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100)15
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Linezolid1 (50)1 (50)DNS isolates. High inoculum tested.19
SA2012, Spain3MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model of biofilm)Linezolid2 (66.7)1 (33.3)Neither DAP nor linezolid alone were active against biofilm-embedded bacteria, while the combination was active against both planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacteria.75
E. faecalis2014, Switzerland3VRE (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Linezolid3 (100)76
E. faecium4VRE (100)Linezolid1 (33.3)1 (33.3)2 (33.3)
SA2015, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD biofilm model)Linezolid2 (100)77
SA2016, Denmark1in vivo (mouse, implant-associated osteomyelitis)Linezolid1 (100)Equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered.70
SA2017, Turkey30MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Linezolid20 (67)10 (33)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect.71
SA2018, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Tedizolid2 (100)78
SA2019, Taiwan100MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Linezolid3 (3)74 (74)23 (23)No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect.30

CB, chequerboard; ET, Etest; DAP, daptomycin; DNS, daptomycin non-susceptible; SA, S. aureus; TK, time–kill assay.

Table 8.

Studies evaluating daptomycin in combination with oxazolidinones

StrainYear and countryNumber of isolatesResistance (%)In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection)Partner drugSynergistic effect (%)Additive effect (%)Indifferent effect (%)Antagonistic effect (%)CommentsReference
SA2006, USA2GISA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)LinezolidET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100)15
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Linezolid1 (50)1 (50)DNS isolates. High inoculum tested.19
SA2012, Spain3MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model of biofilm)Linezolid2 (66.7)1 (33.3)Neither DAP nor linezolid alone were active against biofilm-embedded bacteria, while the combination was active against both planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacteria.75
E. faecalis2014, Switzerland3VRE (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Linezolid3 (100)76
E. faecium4VRE (100)Linezolid1 (33.3)1 (33.3)2 (33.3)
SA2015, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD biofilm model)Linezolid2 (100)77
SA2016, Denmark1in vivo (mouse, implant-associated osteomyelitis)Linezolid1 (100)Equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered.70
SA2017, Turkey30MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Linezolid20 (67)10 (33)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect.71
SA2018, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Tedizolid2 (100)78
SA2019, Taiwan100MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Linezolid3 (3)74 (74)23 (23)No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect.30
StrainYear and countryNumber of isolatesResistance (%)In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection)Partner drugSynergistic effect (%)Additive effect (%)Indifferent effect (%)Antagonistic effect (%)CommentsReference
SA2006, USA2GISA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)LinezolidET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100)15
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Linezolid1 (50)1 (50)DNS isolates. High inoculum tested.19
SA2012, Spain3MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model of biofilm)Linezolid2 (66.7)1 (33.3)Neither DAP nor linezolid alone were active against biofilm-embedded bacteria, while the combination was active against both planktonic and biofilm-embedded bacteria.75
E. faecalis2014, Switzerland3VRE (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Linezolid3 (100)76
E. faecium4VRE (100)Linezolid1 (33.3)1 (33.3)2 (33.3)
SA2015, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD biofilm model)Linezolid2 (100)77
SA2016, Denmark1in vivo (mouse, implant-associated osteomyelitis)Linezolid1 (100)Equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered.70
SA2017, Turkey30MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Linezolid20 (67)10 (33)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect.71
SA2018, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Tedizolid2 (100)78
SA2019, Taiwan100MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Linezolid3 (3)74 (74)23 (23)No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect.30

CB, chequerboard; ET, Etest; DAP, daptomycin; DNS, daptomycin non-susceptible; SA, S. aureus; TK, time–kill assay.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close