Table 2.

Studies evaluating daptomycin in combination with penicillins and penicillins + BLIs

StrainYear and countryNumber of isolatesResistance (%)In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection)Partner drugSynergistic effect (%)Additive effect (%)Indifferent effect (%)Antagonistic effect (%)CommentsReference
SA2004, USA18MRSA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)OxacillinET: 6 (33.3); TK: 11 (61)ET: 12 (66.6); TK: 7 (39)12
E. faecium2004, USA19VRE (100)in vitro (ET)Ampicillin13 (68.4)1 (5.3)5 (26.3)13
SA2005, USA40MRSA (50)in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 MSSA)AmpicillinET: 4 (10)ET: 35 (87.5); TK: 1 (100)ET: 1 (2.5)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. TK was performed on the isolate showing antagonistic effect with ET.14
in vitro (ET, 37 isolates tested)OxacillinET: 4 (11)ET: 33 (89)
E. faecalis, E. faecium40VRE (50)in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 VSE)AmpicillinET: 3 (7.5)ET: 37 (92.5); TK: 1 (100)
SA2006, USA2GISA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)Ampicillin/sulbactamET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100)15
E. faecium2006, Turkey42VRE (100)in vitro (ET)Ampicillin27 (64.2)15 (35.8)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect.16
SA30MRSA (100)Ampicillin/sulbactam28 (93.3)2 (6.7)
Piperacillin/tazobactam22 (73.3)8 (26.7)
Ticarcillin/clavulanate24 (80)6 (20)
SE36MRSE (100)Ampicillin/sulbactam14 (38.8)22 (61.2)
Piperacillin/tazobactam18 (50)18 (50)
Ticarcillin/clavulanate12 (33.3)24 (66.7)
SA2008, Taiwan1VISA (100)in vitro (TK)Oxacillin1 (100)17
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, catheter-induced IE with kidney and spleen dissemination)OxacillinTK: 2 (100)in vivo: 2 (100)DNS isolates. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 12 mg/kg was administered.18
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Nafcillin2 (100)DNS isolates. High inoculum tested.19
E. faecium2012, USA1VRE (100)in vitro (TK, PD model)Ampicillin1 (100)High inoculum tested.20
SA2012, Spain1MRSA (100)in vitro (TK), in vivo (rat, tissue cage infection model)CloxacillinTK: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Standard and high inoculum tested.
In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with both dosages).
21
SA2012, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (TK)Oxacillin, Amoxicillin/clavulanate2 (100)In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered.22
in vivo (G. mellonella infection model)Nafcillin2 (100)
SA2013, USA20VISA (100)in vitro (TK, PK/PD model)Nafcillin11 (55)9 (45)In the PK/PD model, the superiority of the combination compared with monotherapy was not as marked as in TK analysis.23
SA2014, Spain1MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rat, foreign body infection model)Cloxacillinin vitro: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Resistance developed with monotherapies, but not with combinations. Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered.24
E. faecalis2015, USA2VRE (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Ampicillin2 (100)25
E. faecium22 (100)
E. faecium2015, USA4VRE (100)in vitro (TK)Ampicillin2 (50)2 (50)DNS isolates.26
E. faecalis22 (100)
E. faecalis2015, USA1VRE (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Ampicillin1 (100)27
E. faecium22 (100)
SA2016, USA8MRSA (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Piperacillin/tazobactam7 (87.5)1 (12.5)4 DNS isolates.28
Ampicillin/sulbactam7 (87.5)1 (12.5)
E. faecalis2017, Spain8in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 2 strains)AmpicillinTK: 8 (100); in vivo: 2 (100)When testing high inoculum, 2 isolates showed synergism and 6 isolates showed additive effect. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered.31
SA2018, Spain5MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate)CloxacillinTK: 5 (100)in vivo: 1 (100)Synergism was confirmed also when high inoculum was tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with DAP 6  mg/kg, indifferent effect with DAP 10 mg/kg).29
SA2019, Taiwan100MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Oxacillin11 (11)2 (2)87 (87)No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect.30
SA2020, Spain5in vitro (TK), in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate)CloxacillinTK: 5 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 mg/kg was administered.32
E. faecalis2021, USA2VRE (100)in vitro (TK)Ampicillin2 (100)33
E. faecium21 (50)1 (50)
StrainYear and countryNumber of isolatesResistance (%)In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection)Partner drugSynergistic effect (%)Additive effect (%)Indifferent effect (%)Antagonistic effect (%)CommentsReference
SA2004, USA18MRSA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)OxacillinET: 6 (33.3); TK: 11 (61)ET: 12 (66.6); TK: 7 (39)12
E. faecium2004, USA19VRE (100)in vitro (ET)Ampicillin13 (68.4)1 (5.3)5 (26.3)13
SA2005, USA40MRSA (50)in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 MSSA)AmpicillinET: 4 (10)ET: 35 (87.5); TK: 1 (100)ET: 1 (2.5)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. TK was performed on the isolate showing antagonistic effect with ET.14
in vitro (ET, 37 isolates tested)OxacillinET: 4 (11)ET: 33 (89)
E. faecalis, E. faecium40VRE (50)in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 VSE)AmpicillinET: 3 (7.5)ET: 37 (92.5); TK: 1 (100)
SA2006, USA2GISA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)Ampicillin/sulbactamET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100)15
E. faecium2006, Turkey42VRE (100)in vitro (ET)Ampicillin27 (64.2)15 (35.8)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect.16
SA30MRSA (100)Ampicillin/sulbactam28 (93.3)2 (6.7)
Piperacillin/tazobactam22 (73.3)8 (26.7)
Ticarcillin/clavulanate24 (80)6 (20)
SE36MRSE (100)Ampicillin/sulbactam14 (38.8)22 (61.2)
Piperacillin/tazobactam18 (50)18 (50)
Ticarcillin/clavulanate12 (33.3)24 (66.7)
SA2008, Taiwan1VISA (100)in vitro (TK)Oxacillin1 (100)17
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, catheter-induced IE with kidney and spleen dissemination)OxacillinTK: 2 (100)in vivo: 2 (100)DNS isolates. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 12 mg/kg was administered.18
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Nafcillin2 (100)DNS isolates. High inoculum tested.19
E. faecium2012, USA1VRE (100)in vitro (TK, PD model)Ampicillin1 (100)High inoculum tested.20
SA2012, Spain1MRSA (100)in vitro (TK), in vivo (rat, tissue cage infection model)CloxacillinTK: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Standard and high inoculum tested.
In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with both dosages).
21
SA2012, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (TK)Oxacillin, Amoxicillin/clavulanate2 (100)In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered.22
in vivo (G. mellonella infection model)Nafcillin2 (100)
SA2013, USA20VISA (100)in vitro (TK, PK/PD model)Nafcillin11 (55)9 (45)In the PK/PD model, the superiority of the combination compared with monotherapy was not as marked as in TK analysis.23
SA2014, Spain1MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rat, foreign body infection model)Cloxacillinin vitro: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Resistance developed with monotherapies, but not with combinations. Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered.24
E. faecalis2015, USA2VRE (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Ampicillin2 (100)25
E. faecium22 (100)
E. faecium2015, USA4VRE (100)in vitro (TK)Ampicillin2 (50)2 (50)DNS isolates.26
E. faecalis22 (100)
E. faecalis2015, USA1VRE (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Ampicillin1 (100)27
E. faecium22 (100)
SA2016, USA8MRSA (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Piperacillin/tazobactam7 (87.5)1 (12.5)4 DNS isolates.28
Ampicillin/sulbactam7 (87.5)1 (12.5)
E. faecalis2017, Spain8in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 2 strains)AmpicillinTK: 8 (100); in vivo: 2 (100)When testing high inoculum, 2 isolates showed synergism and 6 isolates showed additive effect. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered.31
SA2018, Spain5MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate)CloxacillinTK: 5 (100)in vivo: 1 (100)Synergism was confirmed also when high inoculum was tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with DAP 6  mg/kg, indifferent effect with DAP 10 mg/kg).29
SA2019, Taiwan100MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Oxacillin11 (11)2 (2)87 (87)No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect.30
SA2020, Spain5in vitro (TK), in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate)CloxacillinTK: 5 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 mg/kg was administered.32
E. faecalis2021, USA2VRE (100)in vitro (TK)Ampicillin2 (100)33
E. faecium21 (50)1 (50)

CB, chequerboard; ET, Etest; IE, infective endocarditis; DAP, daptomycin; DNS, daptomycin non-susceptible; SA, S. aureus; SE, S. epidermidis; TK, time–kill assay.

Table 2.

Studies evaluating daptomycin in combination with penicillins and penicillins + BLIs

StrainYear and countryNumber of isolatesResistance (%)In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection)Partner drugSynergistic effect (%)Additive effect (%)Indifferent effect (%)Antagonistic effect (%)CommentsReference
SA2004, USA18MRSA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)OxacillinET: 6 (33.3); TK: 11 (61)ET: 12 (66.6); TK: 7 (39)12
E. faecium2004, USA19VRE (100)in vitro (ET)Ampicillin13 (68.4)1 (5.3)5 (26.3)13
SA2005, USA40MRSA (50)in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 MSSA)AmpicillinET: 4 (10)ET: 35 (87.5); TK: 1 (100)ET: 1 (2.5)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. TK was performed on the isolate showing antagonistic effect with ET.14
in vitro (ET, 37 isolates tested)OxacillinET: 4 (11)ET: 33 (89)
E. faecalis, E. faecium40VRE (50)in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 VSE)AmpicillinET: 3 (7.5)ET: 37 (92.5); TK: 1 (100)
SA2006, USA2GISA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)Ampicillin/sulbactamET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100)15
E. faecium2006, Turkey42VRE (100)in vitro (ET)Ampicillin27 (64.2)15 (35.8)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect.16
SA30MRSA (100)Ampicillin/sulbactam28 (93.3)2 (6.7)
Piperacillin/tazobactam22 (73.3)8 (26.7)
Ticarcillin/clavulanate24 (80)6 (20)
SE36MRSE (100)Ampicillin/sulbactam14 (38.8)22 (61.2)
Piperacillin/tazobactam18 (50)18 (50)
Ticarcillin/clavulanate12 (33.3)24 (66.7)
SA2008, Taiwan1VISA (100)in vitro (TK)Oxacillin1 (100)17
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, catheter-induced IE with kidney and spleen dissemination)OxacillinTK: 2 (100)in vivo: 2 (100)DNS isolates. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 12 mg/kg was administered.18
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Nafcillin2 (100)DNS isolates. High inoculum tested.19
E. faecium2012, USA1VRE (100)in vitro (TK, PD model)Ampicillin1 (100)High inoculum tested.20
SA2012, Spain1MRSA (100)in vitro (TK), in vivo (rat, tissue cage infection model)CloxacillinTK: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Standard and high inoculum tested.
In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with both dosages).
21
SA2012, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (TK)Oxacillin, Amoxicillin/clavulanate2 (100)In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered.22
in vivo (G. mellonella infection model)Nafcillin2 (100)
SA2013, USA20VISA (100)in vitro (TK, PK/PD model)Nafcillin11 (55)9 (45)In the PK/PD model, the superiority of the combination compared with monotherapy was not as marked as in TK analysis.23
SA2014, Spain1MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rat, foreign body infection model)Cloxacillinin vitro: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Resistance developed with monotherapies, but not with combinations. Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered.24
E. faecalis2015, USA2VRE (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Ampicillin2 (100)25
E. faecium22 (100)
E. faecium2015, USA4VRE (100)in vitro (TK)Ampicillin2 (50)2 (50)DNS isolates.26
E. faecalis22 (100)
E. faecalis2015, USA1VRE (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Ampicillin1 (100)27
E. faecium22 (100)
SA2016, USA8MRSA (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Piperacillin/tazobactam7 (87.5)1 (12.5)4 DNS isolates.28
Ampicillin/sulbactam7 (87.5)1 (12.5)
E. faecalis2017, Spain8in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 2 strains)AmpicillinTK: 8 (100); in vivo: 2 (100)When testing high inoculum, 2 isolates showed synergism and 6 isolates showed additive effect. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered.31
SA2018, Spain5MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate)CloxacillinTK: 5 (100)in vivo: 1 (100)Synergism was confirmed also when high inoculum was tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with DAP 6  mg/kg, indifferent effect with DAP 10 mg/kg).29
SA2019, Taiwan100MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Oxacillin11 (11)2 (2)87 (87)No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect.30
SA2020, Spain5in vitro (TK), in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate)CloxacillinTK: 5 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 mg/kg was administered.32
E. faecalis2021, USA2VRE (100)in vitro (TK)Ampicillin2 (100)33
E. faecium21 (50)1 (50)
StrainYear and countryNumber of isolatesResistance (%)In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection)Partner drugSynergistic effect (%)Additive effect (%)Indifferent effect (%)Antagonistic effect (%)CommentsReference
SA2004, USA18MRSA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)OxacillinET: 6 (33.3); TK: 11 (61)ET: 12 (66.6); TK: 7 (39)12
E. faecium2004, USA19VRE (100)in vitro (ET)Ampicillin13 (68.4)1 (5.3)5 (26.3)13
SA2005, USA40MRSA (50)in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 MSSA)AmpicillinET: 4 (10)ET: 35 (87.5); TK: 1 (100)ET: 1 (2.5)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. TK was performed on the isolate showing antagonistic effect with ET.14
in vitro (ET, 37 isolates tested)OxacillinET: 4 (11)ET: 33 (89)
E. faecalis, E. faecium40VRE (50)in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 VSE)AmpicillinET: 3 (7.5)ET: 37 (92.5); TK: 1 (100)
SA2006, USA2GISA (100)in vitro (ET, TK)Ampicillin/sulbactamET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100)15
E. faecium2006, Turkey42VRE (100)in vitro (ET)Ampicillin27 (64.2)15 (35.8)No distinction between additive and indifferent effect.16
SA30MRSA (100)Ampicillin/sulbactam28 (93.3)2 (6.7)
Piperacillin/tazobactam22 (73.3)8 (26.7)
Ticarcillin/clavulanate24 (80)6 (20)
SE36MRSE (100)Ampicillin/sulbactam14 (38.8)22 (61.2)
Piperacillin/tazobactam18 (50)18 (50)
Ticarcillin/clavulanate12 (33.3)24 (66.7)
SA2008, Taiwan1VISA (100)in vitro (TK)Oxacillin1 (100)17
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, catheter-induced IE with kidney and spleen dissemination)OxacillinTK: 2 (100)in vivo: 2 (100)DNS isolates. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 12 mg/kg was administered.18
SA2010, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Nafcillin2 (100)DNS isolates. High inoculum tested.19
E. faecium2012, USA1VRE (100)in vitro (TK, PD model)Ampicillin1 (100)High inoculum tested.20
SA2012, Spain1MRSA (100)in vitro (TK), in vivo (rat, tissue cage infection model)CloxacillinTK: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Standard and high inoculum tested.
In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with both dosages).
21
SA2012, USA2MRSA (100)in vitro (TK)Oxacillin, Amoxicillin/clavulanate2 (100)In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered.22
in vivo (G. mellonella infection model)Nafcillin2 (100)
SA2013, USA20VISA (100)in vitro (TK, PK/PD model)Nafcillin11 (55)9 (45)In the PK/PD model, the superiority of the combination compared with monotherapy was not as marked as in TK analysis.23
SA2014, Spain1MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rat, foreign body infection model)Cloxacillinin vitro: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Resistance developed with monotherapies, but not with combinations. Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered.24
E. faecalis2015, USA2VRE (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Ampicillin2 (100)25
E. faecium22 (100)
E. faecium2015, USA4VRE (100)in vitro (TK)Ampicillin2 (50)2 (50)DNS isolates.26
E. faecalis22 (100)
E. faecalis2015, USA1VRE (100)in vitro (PK/PD model)Ampicillin1 (100)27
E. faecium22 (100)
SA2016, USA8MRSA (100)in vitro (CB, TK)Piperacillin/tazobactam7 (87.5)1 (12.5)4 DNS isolates.28
Ampicillin/sulbactam7 (87.5)1 (12.5)
E. faecalis2017, Spain8in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 2 strains)AmpicillinTK: 8 (100); in vivo: 2 (100)When testing high inoculum, 2 isolates showed synergism and 6 isolates showed additive effect. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered.31
SA2018, Spain5MRSA (100)in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate)CloxacillinTK: 5 (100)in vivo: 1 (100)Synergism was confirmed also when high inoculum was tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with DAP 6  mg/kg, indifferent effect with DAP 10 mg/kg).29
SA2019, Taiwan100MRSA (100)in vitro (CB)Oxacillin11 (11)2 (2)87 (87)No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect.30
SA2020, Spain5in vitro (TK), in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate)CloxacillinTK: 5 (100); in vivo: 1 (100)Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 mg/kg was administered.32
E. faecalis2021, USA2VRE (100)in vitro (TK)Ampicillin2 (100)33
E. faecium21 (50)1 (50)

CB, chequerboard; ET, Etest; IE, infective endocarditis; DAP, daptomycin; DNS, daptomycin non-susceptible; SA, S. aureus; SE, S. epidermidis; TK, time–kill assay.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close