Studies evaluating daptomycin in combination with penicillins and penicillins + BLIs
Strain . | Year and country . | Number of isolates . | Resistance (%) . | In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection) . | Partner drug . | Synergistic effect (%) . | Additive effect (%) . | Indifferent effect (%) . | Antagonistic effect (%) . | Comments . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SA | 2004, USA | 18 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (ET, TK) | Oxacillin | ET: 6 (33.3); TK: 11 (61) | ET: 12 (66.6); TK: 7 (39) | — | — | — | 12 |
E. faecium | 2004, USA | 19 | VRE (100) | in vitro (ET) | Ampicillin | 13 (68.4) | 1 (5.3) | 5 (26.3) | — | — | 13 |
SA | 2005, USA | 40 | MRSA (50) | in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 MSSA) | Ampicillin | ET: 4 (10) | — | ET: 35 (87.5); TK: 1 (100) | ET: 1 (2.5) | No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. TK was performed on the isolate showing antagonistic effect with ET. | 14 |
in vitro (ET, 37 isolates tested) | Oxacillin | ET: 4 (11) | — | ET: 33 (89) | — | ||||||
E. faecalis, E. faecium | 40 | VRE (50) | in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 VSE) | Ampicillin | ET: 3 (7.5) | — | ET: 37 (92.5); TK: 1 (100) | — | |||
SA | 2006, USA | 2 | GISA (100) | in vitro (ET, TK) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | — | — | ET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100) | — | 15 | |
E. faecium | 2006, Turkey | 42 | VRE (100) | in vitro (ET) | Ampicillin | 27 (64.2) | — | 15 (35.8) | — | No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. | 16 |
SA | 30 | MRSA (100) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | 28 (93.3) | — | 2 (6.7) | — | ||||
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 22 (73.3) | — | 8 (26.7) | — | |||||||
Ticarcillin/clavulanate | 24 (80) | — | 6 (20) | — | |||||||
SE | 36 | MRSE (100) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | 14 (38.8) | — | 22 (61.2) | — | ||||
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 18 (50) | — | 18 (50) | — | |||||||
Ticarcillin/clavulanate | 12 (33.3) | — | 24 (66.7) | — | |||||||
SA | 2008, Taiwan | 1 | VISA (100) | in vitro (TK) | Oxacillin | — | 1 (100) | — | — | 17 | |
SA | 2010, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, catheter-induced IE with kidney and spleen dissemination) | Oxacillin | TK: 2 (100) | in vivo: 2 (100) | — | — | DNS isolates. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 12 mg/kg was administered. | 18 |
SA | 2010, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (PK/PD model) | Nafcillin | — | — | 2 (100) | — | DNS isolates. High inoculum tested. | 19 |
E. faecium | 2012, USA | 1 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK, PD model) | Ampicillin | — | 1 (100) | — | — | High inoculum tested. | 20 |
SA | 2012, Spain | 1 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK), in vivo (rat, tissue cage infection model) | Cloxacillin | TK: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with both dosages). | 21 |
SA | 2012, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK) | Oxacillin, Amoxicillin/clavulanate | 2 (100) | — | — | — | In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered. | 22 |
in vivo (G. mellonella infection model) | Nafcillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
SA | 2013, USA | 20 | VISA (100) | in vitro (TK, PK/PD model) | Nafcillin | 11 (55) | — | 9 (45) | — | In the PK/PD model, the superiority of the combination compared with monotherapy was not as marked as in TK analysis. | 23 |
SA | 2014, Spain | 1 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rat, foreign body infection model) | Cloxacillin | in vitro: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Resistance developed with monotherapies, but not with combinations. Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered. | 24 |
E. faecalis | 2015, USA | 2 | VRE (100) | in vitro (CB, TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | 25 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
E. faecium | 2015, USA | 4 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (50) | — | 2 (50) | — | DNS isolates. | 26 |
E. faecalis | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
E. faecalis | 2015, USA | 1 | VRE (100) | in vitro (PK/PD model) | Ampicillin | 1 (100) | — | — | — | 27 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
SA | 2016, USA | 8 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (CB, TK) | Piperacillin/tazobactam | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | — | — | 4 DNS isolates. | 28 |
Ampicillin/sulbactam | 7 (87.5) | — | 1 (12.5) | — | |||||||
E. faecalis | 2017, Spain | 8 | — | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 2 strains) | Ampicillin | TK: 8 (100); in vivo: 2 (100) | — | — | — | When testing high inoculum, 2 isolates showed synergism and 6 isolates showed additive effect. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered. | 31 |
SA | 2018, Spain | 5 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate) | Cloxacillin | TK: 5 (100) | — | in vivo: 1 (100) | — | Synergism was confirmed also when high inoculum was tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with DAP 6 mg/kg, indifferent effect with DAP 10 mg/kg). | 29 |
SA | 2019, Taiwan | 100 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (CB) | Oxacillin | 11 (11) | 2 (2) | 87 (87) | — | No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect. | 30 |
SA | 2020, Spain | 5 | — | in vitro (TK), in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate) | Cloxacillin | TK: 5 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 mg/kg was administered. | 32 |
E. faecalis | 2021, USA | 2 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | 33 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | — | — |
Strain . | Year and country . | Number of isolates . | Resistance (%) . | In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection) . | Partner drug . | Synergistic effect (%) . | Additive effect (%) . | Indifferent effect (%) . | Antagonistic effect (%) . | Comments . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SA | 2004, USA | 18 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (ET, TK) | Oxacillin | ET: 6 (33.3); TK: 11 (61) | ET: 12 (66.6); TK: 7 (39) | — | — | — | 12 |
E. faecium | 2004, USA | 19 | VRE (100) | in vitro (ET) | Ampicillin | 13 (68.4) | 1 (5.3) | 5 (26.3) | — | — | 13 |
SA | 2005, USA | 40 | MRSA (50) | in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 MSSA) | Ampicillin | ET: 4 (10) | — | ET: 35 (87.5); TK: 1 (100) | ET: 1 (2.5) | No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. TK was performed on the isolate showing antagonistic effect with ET. | 14 |
in vitro (ET, 37 isolates tested) | Oxacillin | ET: 4 (11) | — | ET: 33 (89) | — | ||||||
E. faecalis, E. faecium | 40 | VRE (50) | in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 VSE) | Ampicillin | ET: 3 (7.5) | — | ET: 37 (92.5); TK: 1 (100) | — | |||
SA | 2006, USA | 2 | GISA (100) | in vitro (ET, TK) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | — | — | ET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100) | — | 15 | |
E. faecium | 2006, Turkey | 42 | VRE (100) | in vitro (ET) | Ampicillin | 27 (64.2) | — | 15 (35.8) | — | No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. | 16 |
SA | 30 | MRSA (100) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | 28 (93.3) | — | 2 (6.7) | — | ||||
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 22 (73.3) | — | 8 (26.7) | — | |||||||
Ticarcillin/clavulanate | 24 (80) | — | 6 (20) | — | |||||||
SE | 36 | MRSE (100) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | 14 (38.8) | — | 22 (61.2) | — | ||||
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 18 (50) | — | 18 (50) | — | |||||||
Ticarcillin/clavulanate | 12 (33.3) | — | 24 (66.7) | — | |||||||
SA | 2008, Taiwan | 1 | VISA (100) | in vitro (TK) | Oxacillin | — | 1 (100) | — | — | 17 | |
SA | 2010, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, catheter-induced IE with kidney and spleen dissemination) | Oxacillin | TK: 2 (100) | in vivo: 2 (100) | — | — | DNS isolates. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 12 mg/kg was administered. | 18 |
SA | 2010, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (PK/PD model) | Nafcillin | — | — | 2 (100) | — | DNS isolates. High inoculum tested. | 19 |
E. faecium | 2012, USA | 1 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK, PD model) | Ampicillin | — | 1 (100) | — | — | High inoculum tested. | 20 |
SA | 2012, Spain | 1 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK), in vivo (rat, tissue cage infection model) | Cloxacillin | TK: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with both dosages). | 21 |
SA | 2012, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK) | Oxacillin, Amoxicillin/clavulanate | 2 (100) | — | — | — | In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered. | 22 |
in vivo (G. mellonella infection model) | Nafcillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
SA | 2013, USA | 20 | VISA (100) | in vitro (TK, PK/PD model) | Nafcillin | 11 (55) | — | 9 (45) | — | In the PK/PD model, the superiority of the combination compared with monotherapy was not as marked as in TK analysis. | 23 |
SA | 2014, Spain | 1 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rat, foreign body infection model) | Cloxacillin | in vitro: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Resistance developed with monotherapies, but not with combinations. Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered. | 24 |
E. faecalis | 2015, USA | 2 | VRE (100) | in vitro (CB, TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | 25 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
E. faecium | 2015, USA | 4 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (50) | — | 2 (50) | — | DNS isolates. | 26 |
E. faecalis | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
E. faecalis | 2015, USA | 1 | VRE (100) | in vitro (PK/PD model) | Ampicillin | 1 (100) | — | — | — | 27 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
SA | 2016, USA | 8 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (CB, TK) | Piperacillin/tazobactam | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | — | — | 4 DNS isolates. | 28 |
Ampicillin/sulbactam | 7 (87.5) | — | 1 (12.5) | — | |||||||
E. faecalis | 2017, Spain | 8 | — | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 2 strains) | Ampicillin | TK: 8 (100); in vivo: 2 (100) | — | — | — | When testing high inoculum, 2 isolates showed synergism and 6 isolates showed additive effect. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered. | 31 |
SA | 2018, Spain | 5 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate) | Cloxacillin | TK: 5 (100) | — | in vivo: 1 (100) | — | Synergism was confirmed also when high inoculum was tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with DAP 6 mg/kg, indifferent effect with DAP 10 mg/kg). | 29 |
SA | 2019, Taiwan | 100 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (CB) | Oxacillin | 11 (11) | 2 (2) | 87 (87) | — | No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect. | 30 |
SA | 2020, Spain | 5 | — | in vitro (TK), in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate) | Cloxacillin | TK: 5 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 mg/kg was administered. | 32 |
E. faecalis | 2021, USA | 2 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | 33 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | — | — |
CB, chequerboard; ET, Etest; IE, infective endocarditis; DAP, daptomycin; DNS, daptomycin non-susceptible; SA, S. aureus; SE, S. epidermidis; TK, time–kill assay.
Studies evaluating daptomycin in combination with penicillins and penicillins + BLIs
Strain . | Year and country . | Number of isolates . | Resistance (%) . | In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection) . | Partner drug . | Synergistic effect (%) . | Additive effect (%) . | Indifferent effect (%) . | Antagonistic effect (%) . | Comments . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SA | 2004, USA | 18 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (ET, TK) | Oxacillin | ET: 6 (33.3); TK: 11 (61) | ET: 12 (66.6); TK: 7 (39) | — | — | — | 12 |
E. faecium | 2004, USA | 19 | VRE (100) | in vitro (ET) | Ampicillin | 13 (68.4) | 1 (5.3) | 5 (26.3) | — | — | 13 |
SA | 2005, USA | 40 | MRSA (50) | in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 MSSA) | Ampicillin | ET: 4 (10) | — | ET: 35 (87.5); TK: 1 (100) | ET: 1 (2.5) | No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. TK was performed on the isolate showing antagonistic effect with ET. | 14 |
in vitro (ET, 37 isolates tested) | Oxacillin | ET: 4 (11) | — | ET: 33 (89) | — | ||||||
E. faecalis, E. faecium | 40 | VRE (50) | in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 VSE) | Ampicillin | ET: 3 (7.5) | — | ET: 37 (92.5); TK: 1 (100) | — | |||
SA | 2006, USA | 2 | GISA (100) | in vitro (ET, TK) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | — | — | ET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100) | — | 15 | |
E. faecium | 2006, Turkey | 42 | VRE (100) | in vitro (ET) | Ampicillin | 27 (64.2) | — | 15 (35.8) | — | No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. | 16 |
SA | 30 | MRSA (100) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | 28 (93.3) | — | 2 (6.7) | — | ||||
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 22 (73.3) | — | 8 (26.7) | — | |||||||
Ticarcillin/clavulanate | 24 (80) | — | 6 (20) | — | |||||||
SE | 36 | MRSE (100) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | 14 (38.8) | — | 22 (61.2) | — | ||||
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 18 (50) | — | 18 (50) | — | |||||||
Ticarcillin/clavulanate | 12 (33.3) | — | 24 (66.7) | — | |||||||
SA | 2008, Taiwan | 1 | VISA (100) | in vitro (TK) | Oxacillin | — | 1 (100) | — | — | 17 | |
SA | 2010, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, catheter-induced IE with kidney and spleen dissemination) | Oxacillin | TK: 2 (100) | in vivo: 2 (100) | — | — | DNS isolates. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 12 mg/kg was administered. | 18 |
SA | 2010, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (PK/PD model) | Nafcillin | — | — | 2 (100) | — | DNS isolates. High inoculum tested. | 19 |
E. faecium | 2012, USA | 1 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK, PD model) | Ampicillin | — | 1 (100) | — | — | High inoculum tested. | 20 |
SA | 2012, Spain | 1 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK), in vivo (rat, tissue cage infection model) | Cloxacillin | TK: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with both dosages). | 21 |
SA | 2012, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK) | Oxacillin, Amoxicillin/clavulanate | 2 (100) | — | — | — | In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered. | 22 |
in vivo (G. mellonella infection model) | Nafcillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
SA | 2013, USA | 20 | VISA (100) | in vitro (TK, PK/PD model) | Nafcillin | 11 (55) | — | 9 (45) | — | In the PK/PD model, the superiority of the combination compared with monotherapy was not as marked as in TK analysis. | 23 |
SA | 2014, Spain | 1 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rat, foreign body infection model) | Cloxacillin | in vitro: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Resistance developed with monotherapies, but not with combinations. Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered. | 24 |
E. faecalis | 2015, USA | 2 | VRE (100) | in vitro (CB, TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | 25 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
E. faecium | 2015, USA | 4 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (50) | — | 2 (50) | — | DNS isolates. | 26 |
E. faecalis | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
E. faecalis | 2015, USA | 1 | VRE (100) | in vitro (PK/PD model) | Ampicillin | 1 (100) | — | — | — | 27 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
SA | 2016, USA | 8 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (CB, TK) | Piperacillin/tazobactam | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | — | — | 4 DNS isolates. | 28 |
Ampicillin/sulbactam | 7 (87.5) | — | 1 (12.5) | — | |||||||
E. faecalis | 2017, Spain | 8 | — | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 2 strains) | Ampicillin | TK: 8 (100); in vivo: 2 (100) | — | — | — | When testing high inoculum, 2 isolates showed synergism and 6 isolates showed additive effect. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered. | 31 |
SA | 2018, Spain | 5 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate) | Cloxacillin | TK: 5 (100) | — | in vivo: 1 (100) | — | Synergism was confirmed also when high inoculum was tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with DAP 6 mg/kg, indifferent effect with DAP 10 mg/kg). | 29 |
SA | 2019, Taiwan | 100 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (CB) | Oxacillin | 11 (11) | 2 (2) | 87 (87) | — | No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect. | 30 |
SA | 2020, Spain | 5 | — | in vitro (TK), in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate) | Cloxacillin | TK: 5 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 mg/kg was administered. | 32 |
E. faecalis | 2021, USA | 2 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | 33 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | — | — |
Strain . | Year and country . | Number of isolates . | Resistance (%) . | In vitro (methods)/in vivo (animal and site of infection) . | Partner drug . | Synergistic effect (%) . | Additive effect (%) . | Indifferent effect (%) . | Antagonistic effect (%) . | Comments . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SA | 2004, USA | 18 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (ET, TK) | Oxacillin | ET: 6 (33.3); TK: 11 (61) | ET: 12 (66.6); TK: 7 (39) | — | — | — | 12 |
E. faecium | 2004, USA | 19 | VRE (100) | in vitro (ET) | Ampicillin | 13 (68.4) | 1 (5.3) | 5 (26.3) | — | — | 13 |
SA | 2005, USA | 40 | MRSA (50) | in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 MSSA) | Ampicillin | ET: 4 (10) | — | ET: 35 (87.5); TK: 1 (100) | ET: 1 (2.5) | No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. TK was performed on the isolate showing antagonistic effect with ET. | 14 |
in vitro (ET, 37 isolates tested) | Oxacillin | ET: 4 (11) | — | ET: 33 (89) | — | ||||||
E. faecalis, E. faecium | 40 | VRE (50) | in vitro (ET) (TK on 1 VSE) | Ampicillin | ET: 3 (7.5) | — | ET: 37 (92.5); TK: 1 (100) | — | |||
SA | 2006, USA | 2 | GISA (100) | in vitro (ET, TK) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | — | — | ET: 2 (100); TK: 2 (100) | — | 15 | |
E. faecium | 2006, Turkey | 42 | VRE (100) | in vitro (ET) | Ampicillin | 27 (64.2) | — | 15 (35.8) | — | No distinction between additive and indifferent effect. | 16 |
SA | 30 | MRSA (100) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | 28 (93.3) | — | 2 (6.7) | — | ||||
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 22 (73.3) | — | 8 (26.7) | — | |||||||
Ticarcillin/clavulanate | 24 (80) | — | 6 (20) | — | |||||||
SE | 36 | MRSE (100) | Ampicillin/sulbactam | 14 (38.8) | — | 22 (61.2) | — | ||||
Piperacillin/tazobactam | 18 (50) | — | 18 (50) | — | |||||||
Ticarcillin/clavulanate | 12 (33.3) | — | 24 (66.7) | — | |||||||
SA | 2008, Taiwan | 1 | VISA (100) | in vitro (TK) | Oxacillin | — | 1 (100) | — | — | 17 | |
SA | 2010, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, catheter-induced IE with kidney and spleen dissemination) | Oxacillin | TK: 2 (100) | in vivo: 2 (100) | — | — | DNS isolates. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 12 mg/kg was administered. | 18 |
SA | 2010, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (PK/PD model) | Nafcillin | — | — | 2 (100) | — | DNS isolates. High inoculum tested. | 19 |
E. faecium | 2012, USA | 1 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK, PD model) | Ampicillin | — | 1 (100) | — | — | High inoculum tested. | 20 |
SA | 2012, Spain | 1 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK), in vivo (rat, tissue cage infection model) | Cloxacillin | TK: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with both dosages). | 21 |
SA | 2012, USA | 2 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK) | Oxacillin, Amoxicillin/clavulanate | 2 (100) | — | — | — | In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered. | 22 |
in vivo (G. mellonella infection model) | Nafcillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
SA | 2013, USA | 20 | VISA (100) | in vitro (TK, PK/PD model) | Nafcillin | 11 (55) | — | 9 (45) | — | In the PK/PD model, the superiority of the combination compared with monotherapy was not as marked as in TK analysis. | 23 |
SA | 2014, Spain | 1 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rat, foreign body infection model) | Cloxacillin | in vitro: 1 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Resistance developed with monotherapies, but not with combinations. Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 8–10 mg/kg was administered. | 24 |
E. faecalis | 2015, USA | 2 | VRE (100) | in vitro (CB, TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | 25 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
E. faecium | 2015, USA | 4 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (50) | — | 2 (50) | — | DNS isolates. | 26 |
E. faecalis | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
E. faecalis | 2015, USA | 1 | VRE (100) | in vitro (PK/PD model) | Ampicillin | 1 (100) | — | — | — | 27 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 2 (100) | — | — | — | ||||||
SA | 2016, USA | 8 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (CB, TK) | Piperacillin/tazobactam | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | — | — | 4 DNS isolates. | 28 |
Ampicillin/sulbactam | 7 (87.5) | — | 1 (12.5) | — | |||||||
E. faecalis | 2017, Spain | 8 | — | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 2 strains) | Ampicillin | TK: 8 (100); in vivo: 2 (100) | — | — | — | When testing high inoculum, 2 isolates showed synergism and 6 isolates showed additive effect. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 10 mg/kg was administered. | 31 |
SA | 2018, Spain | 5 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (TK); in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate) | Cloxacillin | TK: 5 (100) | — | in vivo: 1 (100) | — | Synergism was confirmed also when high inoculum was tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 and 10 mg/kg was administered (synergism observed with DAP 6 mg/kg, indifferent effect with DAP 10 mg/kg). | 29 |
SA | 2019, Taiwan | 100 | MRSA (100) | in vitro (CB) | Oxacillin | 11 (11) | 2 (2) | 87 (87) | — | No distinction between indifferent and antagonistic effect. | 30 |
SA | 2020, Spain | 5 | — | in vitro (TK), in vivo (rabbit, IE, 1 isolate) | Cloxacillin | TK: 5 (100); in vivo: 1 (100) | — | — | — | Standard and high inoculum tested. In the in vivo study, equivalent human dosage of DAP 6 mg/kg was administered. | 32 |
E. faecalis | 2021, USA | 2 | VRE (100) | in vitro (TK) | Ampicillin | 2 (100) | — | — | — | 33 | |
E. faecium | 2 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | — | — |
CB, chequerboard; ET, Etest; IE, infective endocarditis; DAP, daptomycin; DNS, daptomycin non-susceptible; SA, S. aureus; SE, S. epidermidis; TK, time–kill assay.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.