| Outcomes . | Number of participants . | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) . | Proportion of patients overall with outcome (95% CI) . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urethral Stricture | 395 | ++; Low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap and high overall heterogeneity | .08 (.01–.18) |
| Urethral Fistula | 395 | ++; Low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap and high overall heterogeneity | .14 (.06–.26) |
| Voiding | 325 | +; Very low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap, missing data from Hage | .99 (.88–1.00) |
| Outcomes . | Number of participants . | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) . | Proportion of patients overall with outcome (95% CI) . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urethral Stricture | 395 | ++; Low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap and high overall heterogeneity | .08 (.01–.18) |
| Urethral Fistula | 395 | ++; Low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap and high overall heterogeneity | .14 (.06–.26) |
| Voiding | 325 | +; Very low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap, missing data from Hage | .99 (.88–1.00) |
| Outcomes . | Number of participants . | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) . | Proportion of patients overall with outcome (95% CI) . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urethral Stricture | 395 | ++; Low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap and high overall heterogeneity | .08 (.01–.18) |
| Urethral Fistula | 395 | ++; Low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap and high overall heterogeneity | .14 (.06–.26) |
| Voiding | 325 | +; Very low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap, missing data from Hage | .99 (.88–1.00) |
| Outcomes . | Number of participants . | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) . | Proportion of patients overall with outcome (95% CI) . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urethral Stricture | 395 | ++; Low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap and high overall heterogeneity | .08 (.01–.18) |
| Urethral Fistula | 395 | ++; Low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap and high overall heterogeneity | .14 (.06–.26) |
| Voiding | 325 | +; Very low due to inadequate follow-up of labial ring flap, missing data from Hage | .99 (.88–1.00) |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
