Table 5.

Results from the two Phase II, prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative trials on ceftazidime/avibactam

StudyStudy populationStudy treatmentsEndpointsResults
efficacysafety and tolerability
Vazquez et al.43137 patientsCAZ/AVI 500/125 mg each iv q8h (n = 69) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg iv q6h (n = 68) for 7–14 days (step down to oral ciprofloxacin was permitted)
Inclusion criteriaPrimary endpoint
  • 18–90 years

Favourable microbiological response (FMR) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (5–9 days after the last dose of study drug)a19/27 (70.4%) CAZ/AVI arm
25/35 (71.4%) comparator arm
[observed difference −1.1% (95% CI:−27.2%–25%)]
AEb
46/68 (67.6%) CAZ/AVI arm
51/67 (76.1%) comparator arm
  • Acute pyelonephritis or other cUTI due to Gram-negative pathogens

Exclusion criteriaSecondary endpoint
  • Resistant uropathogen

FMR at the end of iv therapya25/26 (96.2%) CAZ/AVI arm
34/34 (100%) comparator arm
SAEc
6/68 (8.8%) CAZ/AVI arm
2/67 (3%) comparator arm
  • Antibiotic therapy within 48 h prior to the admission urine culture

FMR at the late follow-up (LFU) visit, 4–6 weeks post-therapya15/26 (57.7%) CAZ/AVI arm
18/30 (60%) comparator arm
  • Ileal loops

Clinical response at the end of iv therapyd28/28 (100%) CAZ/AVI arm
36/36 (100%) comparator arm
  • Vescicoureteral reflux

Clinical response at the TOC visitd24/28 (85.7%) CAZ/AVI arm
29/36 (80.5%) comparator arm
  • Complete obstruction of urinary tract

Clinical response at the LFU visitd21/28 (75%) CAZ/AVI arm
24/36 (66.7%) comparator arm
  • Perinephric or intrarenal abscess

  • Fungal UTI

  • Permanent indwelling catheter (nephrostomy)

  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women

  • History of hypersensitivity to study drug

Lucasti et al.44204 patients
Inclusion criteriaCAZ/AVI 2000/500 mg plus metronidazole 500 mg each iv q8h (n = 101) versus meropenem 1000 mg iv q8h (n = 102) for 5–14 daysClinical response at the TOC visita62/68 (91.2%) CAZ/AVI arm
71/76 (93.4%) comparator arm
 [estimated difference −2.2% (95% CI:−20.4%– 12.2%)]
AEe
65/101 (64.4%) CAZ/AVI arm
59/102 (57.8%) comparator arm
  • 18–90 years

  • cIAI requiring surgical intervention and antibiotics, due to Gram-negative pathogens

Exclusion criteria
  • Abdominal wall abscess

  • Small bowel obstruction or ischaemic bowel without perforation

  • Antibiotic therapy within 72 h of study therapy

  • Concurrent infections

  • Perinephric infections

  • Female genital tract infections

  • Infections due to pathogens resistant to study drugs

  • Sepsis or shock unresponsive to iv fluid challenge

Clinical response at the end of iv therapya66/68 (97.1%) CAZ/AVI arm
74/76 (97.4%) comparator arm
 [observed difference −0.3% (95% CI:−17.7%–15.4%)]
SAEf
9/101 (8.9%) CAZ/AVI arm
11/102 (10.8%) comparator arm
  • APACHE II score >25

  • Abnormal liver function

  • Chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis

  • Abnormal renal function (CLCR <50 mL/min)

  • Immunocompromised status

  • BMI >45 kg/m2

  • Haemoglobin levels <10 mg/dL

  • Neutrophil count <1500 cells/mm3

  • Platelet count <100 000 cells/mm3

StudyStudy populationStudy treatmentsEndpointsResults
efficacysafety and tolerability
Vazquez et al.43137 patientsCAZ/AVI 500/125 mg each iv q8h (n = 69) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg iv q6h (n = 68) for 7–14 days (step down to oral ciprofloxacin was permitted)
Inclusion criteriaPrimary endpoint
  • 18–90 years

Favourable microbiological response (FMR) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (5–9 days after the last dose of study drug)a19/27 (70.4%) CAZ/AVI arm
25/35 (71.4%) comparator arm
[observed difference −1.1% (95% CI:−27.2%–25%)]
AEb
46/68 (67.6%) CAZ/AVI arm
51/67 (76.1%) comparator arm
  • Acute pyelonephritis or other cUTI due to Gram-negative pathogens

Exclusion criteriaSecondary endpoint
  • Resistant uropathogen

FMR at the end of iv therapya25/26 (96.2%) CAZ/AVI arm
34/34 (100%) comparator arm
SAEc
6/68 (8.8%) CAZ/AVI arm
2/67 (3%) comparator arm
  • Antibiotic therapy within 48 h prior to the admission urine culture

FMR at the late follow-up (LFU) visit, 4–6 weeks post-therapya15/26 (57.7%) CAZ/AVI arm
18/30 (60%) comparator arm
  • Ileal loops

Clinical response at the end of iv therapyd28/28 (100%) CAZ/AVI arm
36/36 (100%) comparator arm
  • Vescicoureteral reflux

Clinical response at the TOC visitd24/28 (85.7%) CAZ/AVI arm
29/36 (80.5%) comparator arm
  • Complete obstruction of urinary tract

Clinical response at the LFU visitd21/28 (75%) CAZ/AVI arm
24/36 (66.7%) comparator arm
  • Perinephric or intrarenal abscess

  • Fungal UTI

  • Permanent indwelling catheter (nephrostomy)

  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women

  • History of hypersensitivity to study drug

Lucasti et al.44204 patients
Inclusion criteriaCAZ/AVI 2000/500 mg plus metronidazole 500 mg each iv q8h (n = 101) versus meropenem 1000 mg iv q8h (n = 102) for 5–14 daysClinical response at the TOC visita62/68 (91.2%) CAZ/AVI arm
71/76 (93.4%) comparator arm
 [estimated difference −2.2% (95% CI:−20.4%– 12.2%)]
AEe
65/101 (64.4%) CAZ/AVI arm
59/102 (57.8%) comparator arm
  • 18–90 years

  • cIAI requiring surgical intervention and antibiotics, due to Gram-negative pathogens

Exclusion criteria
  • Abdominal wall abscess

  • Small bowel obstruction or ischaemic bowel without perforation

  • Antibiotic therapy within 72 h of study therapy

  • Concurrent infections

  • Perinephric infections

  • Female genital tract infections

  • Infections due to pathogens resistant to study drugs

  • Sepsis or shock unresponsive to iv fluid challenge

Clinical response at the end of iv therapya66/68 (97.1%) CAZ/AVI arm
74/76 (97.4%) comparator arm
 [observed difference −0.3% (95% CI:−17.7%–15.4%)]
SAEf
9/101 (8.9%) CAZ/AVI arm
11/102 (10.8%) comparator arm
  • APACHE II score >25

  • Abnormal liver function

  • Chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis

  • Abnormal renal function (CLCR <50 mL/min)

  • Immunocompromised status

  • BMI >45 kg/m2

  • Haemoglobin levels <10 mg/dL

  • Neutrophil count <1500 cells/mm3

  • Platelet count <100 000 cells/mm3

CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam; cUTI, complicated urinary tract infections; cIAIs, complicated intra-abdominal infections; AE, adverse events; SAE, serious adverse events.

aIn microbiologically evaluable (ME) population.

bMost common adverse events: constipation, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, headache, anxiety and injection/infusion site reactions.

cThree serious adverse events (renal failure, diarrhoea and accidental overdose of CAZ/AVI) were considered to be drug related in the CAZ/AVI arm and one (increased creatinine levels) in the control arm.

dIn clinically evaluable (CE) population.

eMost common adverse events: nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, pyrexia, increased transaminase levels.

fThree deaths in the CAZ/AVI group and two in the control group (none considered to be drug related).

Table 5.

Results from the two Phase II, prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative trials on ceftazidime/avibactam

StudyStudy populationStudy treatmentsEndpointsResults
efficacysafety and tolerability
Vazquez et al.43137 patientsCAZ/AVI 500/125 mg each iv q8h (n = 69) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg iv q6h (n = 68) for 7–14 days (step down to oral ciprofloxacin was permitted)
Inclusion criteriaPrimary endpoint
  • 18–90 years

Favourable microbiological response (FMR) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (5–9 days after the last dose of study drug)a19/27 (70.4%) CAZ/AVI arm
25/35 (71.4%) comparator arm
[observed difference −1.1% (95% CI:−27.2%–25%)]
AEb
46/68 (67.6%) CAZ/AVI arm
51/67 (76.1%) comparator arm
  • Acute pyelonephritis or other cUTI due to Gram-negative pathogens

Exclusion criteriaSecondary endpoint
  • Resistant uropathogen

FMR at the end of iv therapya25/26 (96.2%) CAZ/AVI arm
34/34 (100%) comparator arm
SAEc
6/68 (8.8%) CAZ/AVI arm
2/67 (3%) comparator arm
  • Antibiotic therapy within 48 h prior to the admission urine culture

FMR at the late follow-up (LFU) visit, 4–6 weeks post-therapya15/26 (57.7%) CAZ/AVI arm
18/30 (60%) comparator arm
  • Ileal loops

Clinical response at the end of iv therapyd28/28 (100%) CAZ/AVI arm
36/36 (100%) comparator arm
  • Vescicoureteral reflux

Clinical response at the TOC visitd24/28 (85.7%) CAZ/AVI arm
29/36 (80.5%) comparator arm
  • Complete obstruction of urinary tract

Clinical response at the LFU visitd21/28 (75%) CAZ/AVI arm
24/36 (66.7%) comparator arm
  • Perinephric or intrarenal abscess

  • Fungal UTI

  • Permanent indwelling catheter (nephrostomy)

  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women

  • History of hypersensitivity to study drug

Lucasti et al.44204 patients
Inclusion criteriaCAZ/AVI 2000/500 mg plus metronidazole 500 mg each iv q8h (n = 101) versus meropenem 1000 mg iv q8h (n = 102) for 5–14 daysClinical response at the TOC visita62/68 (91.2%) CAZ/AVI arm
71/76 (93.4%) comparator arm
 [estimated difference −2.2% (95% CI:−20.4%– 12.2%)]
AEe
65/101 (64.4%) CAZ/AVI arm
59/102 (57.8%) comparator arm
  • 18–90 years

  • cIAI requiring surgical intervention and antibiotics, due to Gram-negative pathogens

Exclusion criteria
  • Abdominal wall abscess

  • Small bowel obstruction or ischaemic bowel without perforation

  • Antibiotic therapy within 72 h of study therapy

  • Concurrent infections

  • Perinephric infections

  • Female genital tract infections

  • Infections due to pathogens resistant to study drugs

  • Sepsis or shock unresponsive to iv fluid challenge

Clinical response at the end of iv therapya66/68 (97.1%) CAZ/AVI arm
74/76 (97.4%) comparator arm
 [observed difference −0.3% (95% CI:−17.7%–15.4%)]
SAEf
9/101 (8.9%) CAZ/AVI arm
11/102 (10.8%) comparator arm
  • APACHE II score >25

  • Abnormal liver function

  • Chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis

  • Abnormal renal function (CLCR <50 mL/min)

  • Immunocompromised status

  • BMI >45 kg/m2

  • Haemoglobin levels <10 mg/dL

  • Neutrophil count <1500 cells/mm3

  • Platelet count <100 000 cells/mm3

StudyStudy populationStudy treatmentsEndpointsResults
efficacysafety and tolerability
Vazquez et al.43137 patientsCAZ/AVI 500/125 mg each iv q8h (n = 69) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg iv q6h (n = 68) for 7–14 days (step down to oral ciprofloxacin was permitted)
Inclusion criteriaPrimary endpoint
  • 18–90 years

Favourable microbiological response (FMR) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (5–9 days after the last dose of study drug)a19/27 (70.4%) CAZ/AVI arm
25/35 (71.4%) comparator arm
[observed difference −1.1% (95% CI:−27.2%–25%)]
AEb
46/68 (67.6%) CAZ/AVI arm
51/67 (76.1%) comparator arm
  • Acute pyelonephritis or other cUTI due to Gram-negative pathogens

Exclusion criteriaSecondary endpoint
  • Resistant uropathogen

FMR at the end of iv therapya25/26 (96.2%) CAZ/AVI arm
34/34 (100%) comparator arm
SAEc
6/68 (8.8%) CAZ/AVI arm
2/67 (3%) comparator arm
  • Antibiotic therapy within 48 h prior to the admission urine culture

FMR at the late follow-up (LFU) visit, 4–6 weeks post-therapya15/26 (57.7%) CAZ/AVI arm
18/30 (60%) comparator arm
  • Ileal loops

Clinical response at the end of iv therapyd28/28 (100%) CAZ/AVI arm
36/36 (100%) comparator arm
  • Vescicoureteral reflux

Clinical response at the TOC visitd24/28 (85.7%) CAZ/AVI arm
29/36 (80.5%) comparator arm
  • Complete obstruction of urinary tract

Clinical response at the LFU visitd21/28 (75%) CAZ/AVI arm
24/36 (66.7%) comparator arm
  • Perinephric or intrarenal abscess

  • Fungal UTI

  • Permanent indwelling catheter (nephrostomy)

  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women

  • History of hypersensitivity to study drug

Lucasti et al.44204 patients
Inclusion criteriaCAZ/AVI 2000/500 mg plus metronidazole 500 mg each iv q8h (n = 101) versus meropenem 1000 mg iv q8h (n = 102) for 5–14 daysClinical response at the TOC visita62/68 (91.2%) CAZ/AVI arm
71/76 (93.4%) comparator arm
 [estimated difference −2.2% (95% CI:−20.4%– 12.2%)]
AEe
65/101 (64.4%) CAZ/AVI arm
59/102 (57.8%) comparator arm
  • 18–90 years

  • cIAI requiring surgical intervention and antibiotics, due to Gram-negative pathogens

Exclusion criteria
  • Abdominal wall abscess

  • Small bowel obstruction or ischaemic bowel without perforation

  • Antibiotic therapy within 72 h of study therapy

  • Concurrent infections

  • Perinephric infections

  • Female genital tract infections

  • Infections due to pathogens resistant to study drugs

  • Sepsis or shock unresponsive to iv fluid challenge

Clinical response at the end of iv therapya66/68 (97.1%) CAZ/AVI arm
74/76 (97.4%) comparator arm
 [observed difference −0.3% (95% CI:−17.7%–15.4%)]
SAEf
9/101 (8.9%) CAZ/AVI arm
11/102 (10.8%) comparator arm
  • APACHE II score >25

  • Abnormal liver function

  • Chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis

  • Abnormal renal function (CLCR <50 mL/min)

  • Immunocompromised status

  • BMI >45 kg/m2

  • Haemoglobin levels <10 mg/dL

  • Neutrophil count <1500 cells/mm3

  • Platelet count <100 000 cells/mm3

CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam; cUTI, complicated urinary tract infections; cIAIs, complicated intra-abdominal infections; AE, adverse events; SAE, serious adverse events.

aIn microbiologically evaluable (ME) population.

bMost common adverse events: constipation, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, headache, anxiety and injection/infusion site reactions.

cThree serious adverse events (renal failure, diarrhoea and accidental overdose of CAZ/AVI) were considered to be drug related in the CAZ/AVI arm and one (increased creatinine levels) in the control arm.

dIn clinically evaluable (CE) population.

eMost common adverse events: nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, pyrexia, increased transaminase levels.

fThree deaths in the CAZ/AVI group and two in the control group (none considered to be drug related).

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close