Results from the two Phase II, prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative trials on ceftazidime/avibactam
Study . | Study population . | Study treatments . | Endpoints . | Results . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
efficacy . | safety and tolerability . | ||||
Vazquez et al.43 | 137 patients | CAZ/AVI 500/125 mg each iv q8h (n = 69) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg iv q6h (n = 68) for 7–14 days (step down to oral ciprofloxacin was permitted) | |||
Inclusion criteria | Primary endpoint | ||||
| Favourable microbiological response (FMR) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (5–9 days after the last dose of study drug)a | 19/27 (70.4%) CAZ/AVI arm 25/35 (71.4%) comparator arm [observed difference −1.1% (95% CI:−27.2%–25%)] | AEb 46/68 (67.6%) CAZ/AVI arm 51/67 (76.1%) comparator arm | ||
| |||||
Exclusion criteria | Secondary endpoint | ||||
| FMR at the end of iv therapya | 25/26 (96.2%) CAZ/AVI arm 34/34 (100%) comparator arm | SAEc 6/68 (8.8%) CAZ/AVI arm 2/67 (3%) comparator arm | ||
| FMR at the late follow-up (LFU) visit, 4–6 weeks post-therapya | 15/26 (57.7%) CAZ/AVI arm 18/30 (60%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the end of iv therapyd | 28/28 (100%) CAZ/AVI arm 36/36 (100%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the TOC visitd | 24/28 (85.7%) CAZ/AVI arm 29/36 (80.5%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the LFU visitd | 21/28 (75%) CAZ/AVI arm 24/36 (66.7%) comparator arm | |||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
Lucasti et al.44 | 204 patients | ||||
Inclusion criteria | CAZ/AVI 2000/500 mg plus metronidazole 500 mg each iv q8h (n = 101) versus meropenem 1000 mg iv q8h (n = 102) for 5–14 days | Clinical response at the TOC visita | 62/68 (91.2%) CAZ/AVI arm 71/76 (93.4%) comparator arm [estimated difference −2.2% (95% CI:−20.4%– 12.2%)] | AEe 65/101 (64.4%) CAZ/AVI arm 59/102 (57.8%) comparator arm | |
| |||||
| |||||
Exclusion criteria | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| Clinical response at the end of iv therapya | 66/68 (97.1%) CAZ/AVI arm 74/76 (97.4%) comparator arm [observed difference −0.3% (95% CI:−17.7%–15.4%)] | SAEf 9/101 (8.9%) CAZ/AVI arm 11/102 (10.8%) comparator arm | ||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
|
Study . | Study population . | Study treatments . | Endpoints . | Results . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
efficacy . | safety and tolerability . | ||||
Vazquez et al.43 | 137 patients | CAZ/AVI 500/125 mg each iv q8h (n = 69) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg iv q6h (n = 68) for 7–14 days (step down to oral ciprofloxacin was permitted) | |||
Inclusion criteria | Primary endpoint | ||||
| Favourable microbiological response (FMR) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (5–9 days after the last dose of study drug)a | 19/27 (70.4%) CAZ/AVI arm 25/35 (71.4%) comparator arm [observed difference −1.1% (95% CI:−27.2%–25%)] | AEb 46/68 (67.6%) CAZ/AVI arm 51/67 (76.1%) comparator arm | ||
| |||||
Exclusion criteria | Secondary endpoint | ||||
| FMR at the end of iv therapya | 25/26 (96.2%) CAZ/AVI arm 34/34 (100%) comparator arm | SAEc 6/68 (8.8%) CAZ/AVI arm 2/67 (3%) comparator arm | ||
| FMR at the late follow-up (LFU) visit, 4–6 weeks post-therapya | 15/26 (57.7%) CAZ/AVI arm 18/30 (60%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the end of iv therapyd | 28/28 (100%) CAZ/AVI arm 36/36 (100%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the TOC visitd | 24/28 (85.7%) CAZ/AVI arm 29/36 (80.5%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the LFU visitd | 21/28 (75%) CAZ/AVI arm 24/36 (66.7%) comparator arm | |||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
Lucasti et al.44 | 204 patients | ||||
Inclusion criteria | CAZ/AVI 2000/500 mg plus metronidazole 500 mg each iv q8h (n = 101) versus meropenem 1000 mg iv q8h (n = 102) for 5–14 days | Clinical response at the TOC visita | 62/68 (91.2%) CAZ/AVI arm 71/76 (93.4%) comparator arm [estimated difference −2.2% (95% CI:−20.4%– 12.2%)] | AEe 65/101 (64.4%) CAZ/AVI arm 59/102 (57.8%) comparator arm | |
| |||||
| |||||
Exclusion criteria | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| Clinical response at the end of iv therapya | 66/68 (97.1%) CAZ/AVI arm 74/76 (97.4%) comparator arm [observed difference −0.3% (95% CI:−17.7%–15.4%)] | SAEf 9/101 (8.9%) CAZ/AVI arm 11/102 (10.8%) comparator arm | ||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
|
CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam; cUTI, complicated urinary tract infections; cIAIs, complicated intra-abdominal infections; AE, adverse events; SAE, serious adverse events.
aIn microbiologically evaluable (ME) population.
bMost common adverse events: constipation, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, headache, anxiety and injection/infusion site reactions.
cThree serious adverse events (renal failure, diarrhoea and accidental overdose of CAZ/AVI) were considered to be drug related in the CAZ/AVI arm and one (increased creatinine levels) in the control arm.
dIn clinically evaluable (CE) population.
eMost common adverse events: nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, pyrexia, increased transaminase levels.
fThree deaths in the CAZ/AVI group and two in the control group (none considered to be drug related).
Results from the two Phase II, prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative trials on ceftazidime/avibactam
Study . | Study population . | Study treatments . | Endpoints . | Results . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
efficacy . | safety and tolerability . | ||||
Vazquez et al.43 | 137 patients | CAZ/AVI 500/125 mg each iv q8h (n = 69) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg iv q6h (n = 68) for 7–14 days (step down to oral ciprofloxacin was permitted) | |||
Inclusion criteria | Primary endpoint | ||||
| Favourable microbiological response (FMR) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (5–9 days after the last dose of study drug)a | 19/27 (70.4%) CAZ/AVI arm 25/35 (71.4%) comparator arm [observed difference −1.1% (95% CI:−27.2%–25%)] | AEb 46/68 (67.6%) CAZ/AVI arm 51/67 (76.1%) comparator arm | ||
| |||||
Exclusion criteria | Secondary endpoint | ||||
| FMR at the end of iv therapya | 25/26 (96.2%) CAZ/AVI arm 34/34 (100%) comparator arm | SAEc 6/68 (8.8%) CAZ/AVI arm 2/67 (3%) comparator arm | ||
| FMR at the late follow-up (LFU) visit, 4–6 weeks post-therapya | 15/26 (57.7%) CAZ/AVI arm 18/30 (60%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the end of iv therapyd | 28/28 (100%) CAZ/AVI arm 36/36 (100%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the TOC visitd | 24/28 (85.7%) CAZ/AVI arm 29/36 (80.5%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the LFU visitd | 21/28 (75%) CAZ/AVI arm 24/36 (66.7%) comparator arm | |||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
Lucasti et al.44 | 204 patients | ||||
Inclusion criteria | CAZ/AVI 2000/500 mg plus metronidazole 500 mg each iv q8h (n = 101) versus meropenem 1000 mg iv q8h (n = 102) for 5–14 days | Clinical response at the TOC visita | 62/68 (91.2%) CAZ/AVI arm 71/76 (93.4%) comparator arm [estimated difference −2.2% (95% CI:−20.4%– 12.2%)] | AEe 65/101 (64.4%) CAZ/AVI arm 59/102 (57.8%) comparator arm | |
| |||||
| |||||
Exclusion criteria | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| Clinical response at the end of iv therapya | 66/68 (97.1%) CAZ/AVI arm 74/76 (97.4%) comparator arm [observed difference −0.3% (95% CI:−17.7%–15.4%)] | SAEf 9/101 (8.9%) CAZ/AVI arm 11/102 (10.8%) comparator arm | ||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
|
Study . | Study population . | Study treatments . | Endpoints . | Results . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
efficacy . | safety and tolerability . | ||||
Vazquez et al.43 | 137 patients | CAZ/AVI 500/125 mg each iv q8h (n = 69) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg/500 mg iv q6h (n = 68) for 7–14 days (step down to oral ciprofloxacin was permitted) | |||
Inclusion criteria | Primary endpoint | ||||
| Favourable microbiological response (FMR) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (5–9 days after the last dose of study drug)a | 19/27 (70.4%) CAZ/AVI arm 25/35 (71.4%) comparator arm [observed difference −1.1% (95% CI:−27.2%–25%)] | AEb 46/68 (67.6%) CAZ/AVI arm 51/67 (76.1%) comparator arm | ||
| |||||
Exclusion criteria | Secondary endpoint | ||||
| FMR at the end of iv therapya | 25/26 (96.2%) CAZ/AVI arm 34/34 (100%) comparator arm | SAEc 6/68 (8.8%) CAZ/AVI arm 2/67 (3%) comparator arm | ||
| FMR at the late follow-up (LFU) visit, 4–6 weeks post-therapya | 15/26 (57.7%) CAZ/AVI arm 18/30 (60%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the end of iv therapyd | 28/28 (100%) CAZ/AVI arm 36/36 (100%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the TOC visitd | 24/28 (85.7%) CAZ/AVI arm 29/36 (80.5%) comparator arm | |||
| Clinical response at the LFU visitd | 21/28 (75%) CAZ/AVI arm 24/36 (66.7%) comparator arm | |||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
Lucasti et al.44 | 204 patients | ||||
Inclusion criteria | CAZ/AVI 2000/500 mg plus metronidazole 500 mg each iv q8h (n = 101) versus meropenem 1000 mg iv q8h (n = 102) for 5–14 days | Clinical response at the TOC visita | 62/68 (91.2%) CAZ/AVI arm 71/76 (93.4%) comparator arm [estimated difference −2.2% (95% CI:−20.4%– 12.2%)] | AEe 65/101 (64.4%) CAZ/AVI arm 59/102 (57.8%) comparator arm | |
| |||||
| |||||
Exclusion criteria | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| Clinical response at the end of iv therapya | 66/68 (97.1%) CAZ/AVI arm 74/76 (97.4%) comparator arm [observed difference −0.3% (95% CI:−17.7%–15.4%)] | SAEf 9/101 (8.9%) CAZ/AVI arm 11/102 (10.8%) comparator arm | ||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
|
CAZ/AVI, ceftazidime/avibactam; cUTI, complicated urinary tract infections; cIAIs, complicated intra-abdominal infections; AE, adverse events; SAE, serious adverse events.
aIn microbiologically evaluable (ME) population.
bMost common adverse events: constipation, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, headache, anxiety and injection/infusion site reactions.
cThree serious adverse events (renal failure, diarrhoea and accidental overdose of CAZ/AVI) were considered to be drug related in the CAZ/AVI arm and one (increased creatinine levels) in the control arm.
dIn clinically evaluable (CE) population.
eMost common adverse events: nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, pyrexia, increased transaminase levels.
fThree deaths in the CAZ/AVI group and two in the control group (none considered to be drug related).
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.