. | No of respondents (%) . |
---|---|
What percentage of patients in your practice present with pseudoptosis (ie, lack of pretarsal show due to severe dermatochalasis—refer to Figure 2)? | |
≤10% | 7 (3.3%) |
11%-25% | 33 (15.4%) |
26%-50% | 71 (33.2%) |
515-75% | 72 (33.6%) |
>75% | 31 (14.5%) |
Do you modify your upper blepharoplasty technique in patients who lack pretarsal show (ie, pseudoptosis)? (Select all that apply) | |
No change in technique | 61 (28.5%) |
Decrease the amount of skin resection (compared with patients without pseudoptosis) | 5 (2.3%) |
Increase the amount of skin resection (compared with patients without pseudoptosis) | 121 (56.5%) |
Orbital fat preservation (remove less or no orbital fat when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 23 (10.8%) |
Remove more orbital fat (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 52 (24.3%) |
Orbicularis muscle preservation (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 16 (7.5%) |
More orbicularis muscle removal (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 46 (21.5%) |
Other | 13 (6.1%) |
. | No of respondents (%) . |
---|---|
What percentage of patients in your practice present with pseudoptosis (ie, lack of pretarsal show due to severe dermatochalasis—refer to Figure 2)? | |
≤10% | 7 (3.3%) |
11%-25% | 33 (15.4%) |
26%-50% | 71 (33.2%) |
515-75% | 72 (33.6%) |
>75% | 31 (14.5%) |
Do you modify your upper blepharoplasty technique in patients who lack pretarsal show (ie, pseudoptosis)? (Select all that apply) | |
No change in technique | 61 (28.5%) |
Decrease the amount of skin resection (compared with patients without pseudoptosis) | 5 (2.3%) |
Increase the amount of skin resection (compared with patients without pseudoptosis) | 121 (56.5%) |
Orbital fat preservation (remove less or no orbital fat when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 23 (10.8%) |
Remove more orbital fat (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 52 (24.3%) |
Orbicularis muscle preservation (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 16 (7.5%) |
More orbicularis muscle removal (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 46 (21.5%) |
Other | 13 (6.1%) |
Skipped questions were excluded from total answer counts.
. | No of respondents (%) . |
---|---|
What percentage of patients in your practice present with pseudoptosis (ie, lack of pretarsal show due to severe dermatochalasis—refer to Figure 2)? | |
≤10% | 7 (3.3%) |
11%-25% | 33 (15.4%) |
26%-50% | 71 (33.2%) |
515-75% | 72 (33.6%) |
>75% | 31 (14.5%) |
Do you modify your upper blepharoplasty technique in patients who lack pretarsal show (ie, pseudoptosis)? (Select all that apply) | |
No change in technique | 61 (28.5%) |
Decrease the amount of skin resection (compared with patients without pseudoptosis) | 5 (2.3%) |
Increase the amount of skin resection (compared with patients without pseudoptosis) | 121 (56.5%) |
Orbital fat preservation (remove less or no orbital fat when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 23 (10.8%) |
Remove more orbital fat (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 52 (24.3%) |
Orbicularis muscle preservation (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 16 (7.5%) |
More orbicularis muscle removal (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 46 (21.5%) |
Other | 13 (6.1%) |
. | No of respondents (%) . |
---|---|
What percentage of patients in your practice present with pseudoptosis (ie, lack of pretarsal show due to severe dermatochalasis—refer to Figure 2)? | |
≤10% | 7 (3.3%) |
11%-25% | 33 (15.4%) |
26%-50% | 71 (33.2%) |
515-75% | 72 (33.6%) |
>75% | 31 (14.5%) |
Do you modify your upper blepharoplasty technique in patients who lack pretarsal show (ie, pseudoptosis)? (Select all that apply) | |
No change in technique | 61 (28.5%) |
Decrease the amount of skin resection (compared with patients without pseudoptosis) | 5 (2.3%) |
Increase the amount of skin resection (compared with patients without pseudoptosis) | 121 (56.5%) |
Orbital fat preservation (remove less or no orbital fat when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 23 (10.8%) |
Remove more orbital fat (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 52 (24.3%) |
Orbicularis muscle preservation (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 16 (7.5%) |
More orbicularis muscle removal (when compared with your technique used for patients without pseudoptosis) | 46 (21.5%) |
Other | 13 (6.1%) |
Skipped questions were excluded from total answer counts.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.