| Case . | Stage 1 (plan) . | Stage 2 (plan + VR) . | Changes . |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. 78-Year-old female | Femoral approach | Left carotid approach | Access route |
| 2. 71-Year-old male | No | ||
| 3. 50-Year-old male | Femoral TAVR | Open cardiac surgery | Procedure approach |
| 4. 50-Year-old male V-in-V | PCI coronary protection | No | No need for coronary protection |
| 5. 80-Year-old male | No | ||
| 6. 78-Year-old male | No | ||
| 7. 74-Year-old female (previous mechanical MVR) | Deep implantation planned | Implanted higher than initially planned | Modified depth of implantation |
| 8. 77-Year-old female | No | ||
| 9. 70-Year-old female V-in-V | PCI coronary protection | No | No need for coronary protection |
| 10. 80-Year-old female | No | ||
| 11. 74-Year-old male | No |
| Case . | Stage 1 (plan) . | Stage 2 (plan + VR) . | Changes . |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. 78-Year-old female | Femoral approach | Left carotid approach | Access route |
| 2. 71-Year-old male | No | ||
| 3. 50-Year-old male | Femoral TAVR | Open cardiac surgery | Procedure approach |
| 4. 50-Year-old male V-in-V | PCI coronary protection | No | No need for coronary protection |
| 5. 80-Year-old male | No | ||
| 6. 78-Year-old male | No | ||
| 7. 74-Year-old female (previous mechanical MVR) | Deep implantation planned | Implanted higher than initially planned | Modified depth of implantation |
| 8. 77-Year-old female | No | ||
| 9. 70-Year-old female V-in-V | PCI coronary protection | No | No need for coronary protection |
| 10. 80-Year-old female | No | ||
| 11. 74-Year-old male | No |
TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement; VR: virtual reality.
| Case . | Stage 1 (plan) . | Stage 2 (plan + VR) . | Changes . |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. 78-Year-old female | Femoral approach | Left carotid approach | Access route |
| 2. 71-Year-old male | No | ||
| 3. 50-Year-old male | Femoral TAVR | Open cardiac surgery | Procedure approach |
| 4. 50-Year-old male V-in-V | PCI coronary protection | No | No need for coronary protection |
| 5. 80-Year-old male | No | ||
| 6. 78-Year-old male | No | ||
| 7. 74-Year-old female (previous mechanical MVR) | Deep implantation planned | Implanted higher than initially planned | Modified depth of implantation |
| 8. 77-Year-old female | No | ||
| 9. 70-Year-old female V-in-V | PCI coronary protection | No | No need for coronary protection |
| 10. 80-Year-old female | No | ||
| 11. 74-Year-old male | No |
| Case . | Stage 1 (plan) . | Stage 2 (plan + VR) . | Changes . |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. 78-Year-old female | Femoral approach | Left carotid approach | Access route |
| 2. 71-Year-old male | No | ||
| 3. 50-Year-old male | Femoral TAVR | Open cardiac surgery | Procedure approach |
| 4. 50-Year-old male V-in-V | PCI coronary protection | No | No need for coronary protection |
| 5. 80-Year-old male | No | ||
| 6. 78-Year-old male | No | ||
| 7. 74-Year-old female (previous mechanical MVR) | Deep implantation planned | Implanted higher than initially planned | Modified depth of implantation |
| 8. 77-Year-old female | No | ||
| 9. 70-Year-old female V-in-V | PCI coronary protection | No | No need for coronary protection |
| 10. 80-Year-old female | No | ||
| 11. 74-Year-old male | No |
TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement; VR: virtual reality.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
