Table 1.

Demographics, Surgical Indications, and Surgical Techniques Used in Patients Included in this Series, Including Length of Follow-up, Results, and Complications

Age (years)GenderSurgical procedureIndication for surgerySuture used for hemostatic net (material and size)Time suture left in situ (days)Length of follow-up (months)ResultsComplications
40FemaleRevision breast reduction/mastopexy and augmentationBottomed-out breasts: IMF malpositioned caudally3/0 Ethilon712Well-proportioned, larger breasts with stable improvement in the IMF positionHypopigmented net suture marks at 1-year follow-up
61FemaleBreast implant exchange and change of planeImplant malposition: waterfall effect3/0 Ethilon76Unable to control shape of lateral curvature of breast internally. Excellent shape control achieved with netNone
24FemaleRevision breast implant surgeryImplant malposition3/0 Ethilon76Improvement in implant position and overall breast aestheticsNone
66FemaleImplant revisionImplant malposition: overly large implants3/0 Ethilon73425-cc McGhan implants (Allergan, Irvine, CA) were replaced with 255-cc Mentor implants (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ). Good shape control achieved with netNone
30FemaleImplant revisionImplant malposition: bottomed-out implants, waterfall effect3/0 Ethilon79Good shape control achievedNone
24FemaleReverse abdominoplastyExcess fat and skin in the upper abdomen3/0 Prolene37Excess fat and skin were excised, the IMF was successfully stabilized with the net without any tension across the foldNone
46FemaleReverse abdominoplastyExcess fat and skin in the upper abdomen3/0 Ethilon33Upper abdominal skin laxity corrected, glandular ptosis improved, IMF stabilizedNone
38FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl420Improvement of breast ptosisNone
41FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl419Improvement of breast ptosisNone
44FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl424Improvement of breast ptosisNone
41FemaleMastopexySymmastia2/0 Monocryl420Improvement in medial border of breastNone
36FemaleIMF symmetrizationIMF asymmetry4/0 Monocryl326Loss of IMF control occurred despite the netRelapse of IMF asymmetry
54FemaleImplant exchangeSymmastia2/0 Monocryl420Increased IMF stability, improved cleavage symmetry and medial and inferior breast contourNone
45FemaleImplant exchangeImplant failure2/0 Monocryl422Repositioning of implant in optimum position, restored overall breast aestheticNone
23FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsPuffy areola4/0 Monocryl423Improvement in areola aestheticsNone
27FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsNipple pointing down4/0 Monocryl416Improvement in areola aesthetics and nipple projectionNone
24FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsNipple pointing down4/0 Monocryl411Improvement in areola aesthetics and nipple projectionNone
35FemaleBreast reconstructionLatissimus dorsi flap2/0 Monocryl411Restoration in breast volume and improvement in breast aestheticTemporary hyperpigmented net suture marks
48FemaleRevision augmentation mastopexyImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43Repositioning of breast implant into optimum position, stable IMFNone
67FemaleRevision augmentation mastopexyImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43Repositioning of breast implant into optimum position, stable IMFNone
31FemaleBreast augmentationImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43.5Repositioning of implant with good skin redraping achievedNone
44FemaleBreast augmentationImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43.5Repositioning of implant with good skin redraping achievedNone
33FemaleBreast augmentationAugmentation2/0 Monocryl416Larger, fuller, well-proportioned breastsNone
37FemaleBreast augmentationAugmentation2/0 Monocryl422Larger, fuller, well-proportioned breastsTemporary hyperpigmented net suture marks
Age (years)GenderSurgical procedureIndication for surgerySuture used for hemostatic net (material and size)Time suture left in situ (days)Length of follow-up (months)ResultsComplications
40FemaleRevision breast reduction/mastopexy and augmentationBottomed-out breasts: IMF malpositioned caudally3/0 Ethilon712Well-proportioned, larger breasts with stable improvement in the IMF positionHypopigmented net suture marks at 1-year follow-up
61FemaleBreast implant exchange and change of planeImplant malposition: waterfall effect3/0 Ethilon76Unable to control shape of lateral curvature of breast internally. Excellent shape control achieved with netNone
24FemaleRevision breast implant surgeryImplant malposition3/0 Ethilon76Improvement in implant position and overall breast aestheticsNone
66FemaleImplant revisionImplant malposition: overly large implants3/0 Ethilon73425-cc McGhan implants (Allergan, Irvine, CA) were replaced with 255-cc Mentor implants (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ). Good shape control achieved with netNone
30FemaleImplant revisionImplant malposition: bottomed-out implants, waterfall effect3/0 Ethilon79Good shape control achievedNone
24FemaleReverse abdominoplastyExcess fat and skin in the upper abdomen3/0 Prolene37Excess fat and skin were excised, the IMF was successfully stabilized with the net without any tension across the foldNone
46FemaleReverse abdominoplastyExcess fat and skin in the upper abdomen3/0 Ethilon33Upper abdominal skin laxity corrected, glandular ptosis improved, IMF stabilizedNone
38FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl420Improvement of breast ptosisNone
41FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl419Improvement of breast ptosisNone
44FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl424Improvement of breast ptosisNone
41FemaleMastopexySymmastia2/0 Monocryl420Improvement in medial border of breastNone
36FemaleIMF symmetrizationIMF asymmetry4/0 Monocryl326Loss of IMF control occurred despite the netRelapse of IMF asymmetry
54FemaleImplant exchangeSymmastia2/0 Monocryl420Increased IMF stability, improved cleavage symmetry and medial and inferior breast contourNone
45FemaleImplant exchangeImplant failure2/0 Monocryl422Repositioning of implant in optimum position, restored overall breast aestheticNone
23FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsPuffy areola4/0 Monocryl423Improvement in areola aestheticsNone
27FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsNipple pointing down4/0 Monocryl416Improvement in areola aesthetics and nipple projectionNone
24FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsNipple pointing down4/0 Monocryl411Improvement in areola aesthetics and nipple projectionNone
35FemaleBreast reconstructionLatissimus dorsi flap2/0 Monocryl411Restoration in breast volume and improvement in breast aestheticTemporary hyperpigmented net suture marks
48FemaleRevision augmentation mastopexyImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43Repositioning of breast implant into optimum position, stable IMFNone
67FemaleRevision augmentation mastopexyImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43Repositioning of breast implant into optimum position, stable IMFNone
31FemaleBreast augmentationImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43.5Repositioning of implant with good skin redraping achievedNone
44FemaleBreast augmentationImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43.5Repositioning of implant with good skin redraping achievedNone
33FemaleBreast augmentationAugmentation2/0 Monocryl416Larger, fuller, well-proportioned breastsNone
37FemaleBreast augmentationAugmentation2/0 Monocryl422Larger, fuller, well-proportioned breastsTemporary hyperpigmented net suture marks

IMF, inframammary fold.

Table 1.

Demographics, Surgical Indications, and Surgical Techniques Used in Patients Included in this Series, Including Length of Follow-up, Results, and Complications

Age (years)GenderSurgical procedureIndication for surgerySuture used for hemostatic net (material and size)Time suture left in situ (days)Length of follow-up (months)ResultsComplications
40FemaleRevision breast reduction/mastopexy and augmentationBottomed-out breasts: IMF malpositioned caudally3/0 Ethilon712Well-proportioned, larger breasts with stable improvement in the IMF positionHypopigmented net suture marks at 1-year follow-up
61FemaleBreast implant exchange and change of planeImplant malposition: waterfall effect3/0 Ethilon76Unable to control shape of lateral curvature of breast internally. Excellent shape control achieved with netNone
24FemaleRevision breast implant surgeryImplant malposition3/0 Ethilon76Improvement in implant position and overall breast aestheticsNone
66FemaleImplant revisionImplant malposition: overly large implants3/0 Ethilon73425-cc McGhan implants (Allergan, Irvine, CA) were replaced with 255-cc Mentor implants (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ). Good shape control achieved with netNone
30FemaleImplant revisionImplant malposition: bottomed-out implants, waterfall effect3/0 Ethilon79Good shape control achievedNone
24FemaleReverse abdominoplastyExcess fat and skin in the upper abdomen3/0 Prolene37Excess fat and skin were excised, the IMF was successfully stabilized with the net without any tension across the foldNone
46FemaleReverse abdominoplastyExcess fat and skin in the upper abdomen3/0 Ethilon33Upper abdominal skin laxity corrected, glandular ptosis improved, IMF stabilizedNone
38FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl420Improvement of breast ptosisNone
41FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl419Improvement of breast ptosisNone
44FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl424Improvement of breast ptosisNone
41FemaleMastopexySymmastia2/0 Monocryl420Improvement in medial border of breastNone
36FemaleIMF symmetrizationIMF asymmetry4/0 Monocryl326Loss of IMF control occurred despite the netRelapse of IMF asymmetry
54FemaleImplant exchangeSymmastia2/0 Monocryl420Increased IMF stability, improved cleavage symmetry and medial and inferior breast contourNone
45FemaleImplant exchangeImplant failure2/0 Monocryl422Repositioning of implant in optimum position, restored overall breast aestheticNone
23FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsPuffy areola4/0 Monocryl423Improvement in areola aestheticsNone
27FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsNipple pointing down4/0 Monocryl416Improvement in areola aesthetics and nipple projectionNone
24FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsNipple pointing down4/0 Monocryl411Improvement in areola aesthetics and nipple projectionNone
35FemaleBreast reconstructionLatissimus dorsi flap2/0 Monocryl411Restoration in breast volume and improvement in breast aestheticTemporary hyperpigmented net suture marks
48FemaleRevision augmentation mastopexyImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43Repositioning of breast implant into optimum position, stable IMFNone
67FemaleRevision augmentation mastopexyImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43Repositioning of breast implant into optimum position, stable IMFNone
31FemaleBreast augmentationImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43.5Repositioning of implant with good skin redraping achievedNone
44FemaleBreast augmentationImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43.5Repositioning of implant with good skin redraping achievedNone
33FemaleBreast augmentationAugmentation2/0 Monocryl416Larger, fuller, well-proportioned breastsNone
37FemaleBreast augmentationAugmentation2/0 Monocryl422Larger, fuller, well-proportioned breastsTemporary hyperpigmented net suture marks
Age (years)GenderSurgical procedureIndication for surgerySuture used for hemostatic net (material and size)Time suture left in situ (days)Length of follow-up (months)ResultsComplications
40FemaleRevision breast reduction/mastopexy and augmentationBottomed-out breasts: IMF malpositioned caudally3/0 Ethilon712Well-proportioned, larger breasts with stable improvement in the IMF positionHypopigmented net suture marks at 1-year follow-up
61FemaleBreast implant exchange and change of planeImplant malposition: waterfall effect3/0 Ethilon76Unable to control shape of lateral curvature of breast internally. Excellent shape control achieved with netNone
24FemaleRevision breast implant surgeryImplant malposition3/0 Ethilon76Improvement in implant position and overall breast aestheticsNone
66FemaleImplant revisionImplant malposition: overly large implants3/0 Ethilon73425-cc McGhan implants (Allergan, Irvine, CA) were replaced with 255-cc Mentor implants (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ). Good shape control achieved with netNone
30FemaleImplant revisionImplant malposition: bottomed-out implants, waterfall effect3/0 Ethilon79Good shape control achievedNone
24FemaleReverse abdominoplastyExcess fat and skin in the upper abdomen3/0 Prolene37Excess fat and skin were excised, the IMF was successfully stabilized with the net without any tension across the foldNone
46FemaleReverse abdominoplastyExcess fat and skin in the upper abdomen3/0 Ethilon33Upper abdominal skin laxity corrected, glandular ptosis improved, IMF stabilizedNone
38FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl420Improvement of breast ptosisNone
41FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl419Improvement of breast ptosisNone
44FemaleMastopexyBreast ptosis2/0 Monocryl424Improvement of breast ptosisNone
41FemaleMastopexySymmastia2/0 Monocryl420Improvement in medial border of breastNone
36FemaleIMF symmetrizationIMF asymmetry4/0 Monocryl326Loss of IMF control occurred despite the netRelapse of IMF asymmetry
54FemaleImplant exchangeSymmastia2/0 Monocryl420Increased IMF stability, improved cleavage symmetry and medial and inferior breast contourNone
45FemaleImplant exchangeImplant failure2/0 Monocryl422Repositioning of implant in optimum position, restored overall breast aestheticNone
23FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsPuffy areola4/0 Monocryl423Improvement in areola aestheticsNone
27FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsNipple pointing down4/0 Monocryl416Improvement in areola aesthetics and nipple projectionNone
24FemaleAreola adjustment in tubular breastsNipple pointing down4/0 Monocryl411Improvement in areola aesthetics and nipple projectionNone
35FemaleBreast reconstructionLatissimus dorsi flap2/0 Monocryl411Restoration in breast volume and improvement in breast aestheticTemporary hyperpigmented net suture marks
48FemaleRevision augmentation mastopexyImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43Repositioning of breast implant into optimum position, stable IMFNone
67FemaleRevision augmentation mastopexyImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43Repositioning of breast implant into optimum position, stable IMFNone
31FemaleBreast augmentationImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43.5Repositioning of implant with good skin redraping achievedNone
44FemaleBreast augmentationImplant displacement2/0 Monocryl43.5Repositioning of implant with good skin redraping achievedNone
33FemaleBreast augmentationAugmentation2/0 Monocryl416Larger, fuller, well-proportioned breastsNone
37FemaleBreast augmentationAugmentation2/0 Monocryl422Larger, fuller, well-proportioned breastsTemporary hyperpigmented net suture marks

IMF, inframammary fold.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close