Table 3

Association of joint parental bias with children’s health

(1)(2)(3)
Incidence of illnessFormal treatmentTreatment cost (taka)
Parents’ bias
 Boy-biased0.041−0.00776.9
(0.052)(0.040)(71.9)
 Girl-biased−0.044−0.029−32.6
(0.072)(0.044)(76.5)
Parents’ bias * girl
 Boy-biased * girl−0.008−0.161**−326.7***
(0.089)(0.063)(91.0)
 Girl-biased * girl−0.009−0.075−125.6
(0.084)(0.086)(126.1)
 Girl0.0580.109426.5
(0.120)(0.186)(300.1)
Observations432316316
R-squared0.6260.2070.398
(1)(2)(3)
Incidence of illnessFormal treatmentTreatment cost (taka)
Parents’ bias
 Boy-biased0.041−0.00776.9
(0.052)(0.040)(71.9)
 Girl-biased−0.044−0.029−32.6
(0.072)(0.044)(76.5)
Parents’ bias * girl
 Boy-biased * girl−0.008−0.161**−326.7***
(0.089)(0.063)(91.0)
 Girl-biased * girl−0.009−0.075−125.6
(0.084)(0.086)(126.1)
 Girl0.0580.109426.5
(0.120)(0.186)(300.1)
Observations432316316
R-squared0.6260.2070.398

Notes: *** and ** indicate significance at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively. The standard errors (in parentheses) are corrected for clustering at the village level. The base category for ‘parents’ bias’ is unbiased. The regressions are based on a full set of controls, viz., individual and sibling controls including age, age square, interaction of age and gender, number of brothers of the child, number of older siblings, and a vector of dummies indicating number of siblings; parental and household controls including a vector of dummies indicating the highest education level among parents and indicating the occupation of the household head, mother’s age, a dummy variable for whether the household head is Muslim and for whether the household has electricity, and the household’s landholding per capita; and a village dummy. The illness regression (Column 1) includes additional controls for access to safe water and sanitation; the regressions for formal treatment and treatment cost (Columns 2 and 3) also include additional controls for the duration of illness. The sample includes children aged 0–15 years in households involving joint decisions.

Source: Authors’ calculations.

Table 3

Association of joint parental bias with children’s health

(1)(2)(3)
Incidence of illnessFormal treatmentTreatment cost (taka)
Parents’ bias
 Boy-biased0.041−0.00776.9
(0.052)(0.040)(71.9)
 Girl-biased−0.044−0.029−32.6
(0.072)(0.044)(76.5)
Parents’ bias * girl
 Boy-biased * girl−0.008−0.161**−326.7***
(0.089)(0.063)(91.0)
 Girl-biased * girl−0.009−0.075−125.6
(0.084)(0.086)(126.1)
 Girl0.0580.109426.5
(0.120)(0.186)(300.1)
Observations432316316
R-squared0.6260.2070.398
(1)(2)(3)
Incidence of illnessFormal treatmentTreatment cost (taka)
Parents’ bias
 Boy-biased0.041−0.00776.9
(0.052)(0.040)(71.9)
 Girl-biased−0.044−0.029−32.6
(0.072)(0.044)(76.5)
Parents’ bias * girl
 Boy-biased * girl−0.008−0.161**−326.7***
(0.089)(0.063)(91.0)
 Girl-biased * girl−0.009−0.075−125.6
(0.084)(0.086)(126.1)
 Girl0.0580.109426.5
(0.120)(0.186)(300.1)
Observations432316316
R-squared0.6260.2070.398

Notes: *** and ** indicate significance at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively. The standard errors (in parentheses) are corrected for clustering at the village level. The base category for ‘parents’ bias’ is unbiased. The regressions are based on a full set of controls, viz., individual and sibling controls including age, age square, interaction of age and gender, number of brothers of the child, number of older siblings, and a vector of dummies indicating number of siblings; parental and household controls including a vector of dummies indicating the highest education level among parents and indicating the occupation of the household head, mother’s age, a dummy variable for whether the household head is Muslim and for whether the household has electricity, and the household’s landholding per capita; and a village dummy. The illness regression (Column 1) includes additional controls for access to safe water and sanitation; the regressions for formal treatment and treatment cost (Columns 2 and 3) also include additional controls for the duration of illness. The sample includes children aged 0–15 years in households involving joint decisions.

Source: Authors’ calculations.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close