. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . |
---|---|---|---|
. | Incidence of illness . | Formal treatment . | Treatment cost (taka) . |
Parents’ bias | |||
Boy-biased | 0.041 | −0.007 | 76.9 |
(0.052) | (0.040) | (71.9) | |
Girl-biased | −0.044 | −0.029 | −32.6 |
(0.072) | (0.044) | (76.5) | |
Parents’ bias * girl | |||
Boy-biased * girl | −0.008 | −0.161** | −326.7*** |
(0.089) | (0.063) | (91.0) | |
Girl-biased * girl | −0.009 | −0.075 | −125.6 |
(0.084) | (0.086) | (126.1) | |
Girl | 0.058 | 0.109 | 426.5 |
(0.120) | (0.186) | (300.1) | |
Observations | 432 | 316 | 316 |
R-squared | 0.626 | 0.207 | 0.398 |
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . |
---|---|---|---|
. | Incidence of illness . | Formal treatment . | Treatment cost (taka) . |
Parents’ bias | |||
Boy-biased | 0.041 | −0.007 | 76.9 |
(0.052) | (0.040) | (71.9) | |
Girl-biased | −0.044 | −0.029 | −32.6 |
(0.072) | (0.044) | (76.5) | |
Parents’ bias * girl | |||
Boy-biased * girl | −0.008 | −0.161** | −326.7*** |
(0.089) | (0.063) | (91.0) | |
Girl-biased * girl | −0.009 | −0.075 | −125.6 |
(0.084) | (0.086) | (126.1) | |
Girl | 0.058 | 0.109 | 426.5 |
(0.120) | (0.186) | (300.1) | |
Observations | 432 | 316 | 316 |
R-squared | 0.626 | 0.207 | 0.398 |
Notes: *** and ** indicate significance at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively. The standard errors (in parentheses) are corrected for clustering at the village level. The base category for ‘parents’ bias’ is unbiased. The regressions are based on a full set of controls, viz., individual and sibling controls including age, age square, interaction of age and gender, number of brothers of the child, number of older siblings, and a vector of dummies indicating number of siblings; parental and household controls including a vector of dummies indicating the highest education level among parents and indicating the occupation of the household head, mother’s age, a dummy variable for whether the household head is Muslim and for whether the household has electricity, and the household’s landholding per capita; and a village dummy. The illness regression (Column 1) includes additional controls for access to safe water and sanitation; the regressions for formal treatment and treatment cost (Columns 2 and 3) also include additional controls for the duration of illness. The sample includes children aged 0–15 years in households involving joint decisions.
Source: Authors’ calculations.
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . |
---|---|---|---|
. | Incidence of illness . | Formal treatment . | Treatment cost (taka) . |
Parents’ bias | |||
Boy-biased | 0.041 | −0.007 | 76.9 |
(0.052) | (0.040) | (71.9) | |
Girl-biased | −0.044 | −0.029 | −32.6 |
(0.072) | (0.044) | (76.5) | |
Parents’ bias * girl | |||
Boy-biased * girl | −0.008 | −0.161** | −326.7*** |
(0.089) | (0.063) | (91.0) | |
Girl-biased * girl | −0.009 | −0.075 | −125.6 |
(0.084) | (0.086) | (126.1) | |
Girl | 0.058 | 0.109 | 426.5 |
(0.120) | (0.186) | (300.1) | |
Observations | 432 | 316 | 316 |
R-squared | 0.626 | 0.207 | 0.398 |
. | (1) . | (2) . | (3) . |
---|---|---|---|
. | Incidence of illness . | Formal treatment . | Treatment cost (taka) . |
Parents’ bias | |||
Boy-biased | 0.041 | −0.007 | 76.9 |
(0.052) | (0.040) | (71.9) | |
Girl-biased | −0.044 | −0.029 | −32.6 |
(0.072) | (0.044) | (76.5) | |
Parents’ bias * girl | |||
Boy-biased * girl | −0.008 | −0.161** | −326.7*** |
(0.089) | (0.063) | (91.0) | |
Girl-biased * girl | −0.009 | −0.075 | −125.6 |
(0.084) | (0.086) | (126.1) | |
Girl | 0.058 | 0.109 | 426.5 |
(0.120) | (0.186) | (300.1) | |
Observations | 432 | 316 | 316 |
R-squared | 0.626 | 0.207 | 0.398 |
Notes: *** and ** indicate significance at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively. The standard errors (in parentheses) are corrected for clustering at the village level. The base category for ‘parents’ bias’ is unbiased. The regressions are based on a full set of controls, viz., individual and sibling controls including age, age square, interaction of age and gender, number of brothers of the child, number of older siblings, and a vector of dummies indicating number of siblings; parental and household controls including a vector of dummies indicating the highest education level among parents and indicating the occupation of the household head, mother’s age, a dummy variable for whether the household head is Muslim and for whether the household has electricity, and the household’s landholding per capita; and a village dummy. The illness regression (Column 1) includes additional controls for access to safe water and sanitation; the regressions for formal treatment and treatment cost (Columns 2 and 3) also include additional controls for the duration of illness. The sample includes children aged 0–15 years in households involving joint decisions.
Source: Authors’ calculations.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.