Variable . | . | Time posttreatment (months) . | n . | Mean [SD] . | Median (min, max) . | P valuea . | Very much improved, much improved, improved, n (%) . | No change, n (%) . | Worse, n (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement | 1 | 30 | 2.90 [0.84] | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | <0.001 | ||||
3 | 32 | 3.16 [0.72] | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | <0.001 | |||||
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment | 3 | 32 | 3.06 [0.74] | 3.0 (1.5, 4.5) | <0.001 | ||||
Frequency tabulation for global aesthetic improvement assessment | Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement | 1 | 30 | 22 (73.3) | 8 (26.7) | 0 | |||
3 | 32 | 22 (68.8) | 10 (31.3) | 0 | |||||
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment | 3 | 32 | 26 (81.3) | 4 (12.5) | 2 (6.3) |
Variable . | . | Time posttreatment (months) . | n . | Mean [SD] . | Median (min, max) . | P valuea . | Very much improved, much improved, improved, n (%) . | No change, n (%) . | Worse, n (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement | 1 | 30 | 2.90 [0.84] | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | <0.001 | ||||
3 | 32 | 3.16 [0.72] | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | <0.001 | |||||
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment | 3 | 32 | 3.06 [0.74] | 3.0 (1.5, 4.5) | <0.001 | ||||
Frequency tabulation for global aesthetic improvement assessment | Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement | 1 | 30 | 22 (73.3) | 8 (26.7) | 0 | |||
3 | 32 | 22 (68.8) | 10 (31.3) | 0 | |||||
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment | 3 | 32 | 26 (81.3) | 4 (12.5) | 2 (6.3) |
SD, standard deviation.
aCalculated with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Variable . | . | Time posttreatment (months) . | n . | Mean [SD] . | Median (min, max) . | P valuea . | Very much improved, much improved, improved, n (%) . | No change, n (%) . | Worse, n (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement | 1 | 30 | 2.90 [0.84] | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | <0.001 | ||||
3 | 32 | 3.16 [0.72] | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | <0.001 | |||||
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment | 3 | 32 | 3.06 [0.74] | 3.0 (1.5, 4.5) | <0.001 | ||||
Frequency tabulation for global aesthetic improvement assessment | Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement | 1 | 30 | 22 (73.3) | 8 (26.7) | 0 | |||
3 | 32 | 22 (68.8) | 10 (31.3) | 0 | |||||
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment | 3 | 32 | 26 (81.3) | 4 (12.5) | 2 (6.3) |
Variable . | . | Time posttreatment (months) . | n . | Mean [SD] . | Median (min, max) . | P valuea . | Very much improved, much improved, improved, n (%) . | No change, n (%) . | Worse, n (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement | 1 | 30 | 2.90 [0.84] | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | <0.001 | ||||
3 | 32 | 3.16 [0.72] | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | <0.001 | |||||
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment | 3 | 32 | 3.06 [0.74] | 3.0 (1.5, 4.5) | <0.001 | ||||
Frequency tabulation for global aesthetic improvement assessment | Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement | 1 | 30 | 22 (73.3) | 8 (26.7) | 0 | |||
3 | 32 | 22 (68.8) | 10 (31.3) | 0 | |||||
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment | 3 | 32 | 26 (81.3) | 4 (12.5) | 2 (6.3) |
SD, standard deviation.
aCalculated with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.