Table 4.

Descriptive Statistics for Global Aesthetic Improvement Assessment

VariableTime posttreatment (months)nMean [SD]Median (min, max)P valueaVery much improved, much improved, improved, n (%)No change, n (%)Worse, n (%)
Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement1302.90 [0.84]3.0 (1.0, 4.0)<0.001
3323.16 [0.72]3.0 (1.0, 4.0)<0.001
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment3323.06 [0.74]3.0 (1.5, 4.5)<0.001
Frequency tabulation for global aesthetic improvement assessmentSubject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement13022 (73.3)8 (26.7)0
33222 (68.8)10 (31.3)0
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment33226 (81.3)4 (12.5)2 (6.3)
VariableTime posttreatment (months)nMean [SD]Median (min, max)P valueaVery much improved, much improved, improved, n (%)No change, n (%)Worse, n (%)
Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement1302.90 [0.84]3.0 (1.0, 4.0)<0.001
3323.16 [0.72]3.0 (1.0, 4.0)<0.001
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment3323.06 [0.74]3.0 (1.5, 4.5)<0.001
Frequency tabulation for global aesthetic improvement assessmentSubject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement13022 (73.3)8 (26.7)0
33222 (68.8)10 (31.3)0
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment33226 (81.3)4 (12.5)2 (6.3)

SD, standard deviation.

aCalculated with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Table 4.

Descriptive Statistics for Global Aesthetic Improvement Assessment

VariableTime posttreatment (months)nMean [SD]Median (min, max)P valueaVery much improved, much improved, improved, n (%)No change, n (%)Worse, n (%)
Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement1302.90 [0.84]3.0 (1.0, 4.0)<0.001
3323.16 [0.72]3.0 (1.0, 4.0)<0.001
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment3323.06 [0.74]3.0 (1.5, 4.5)<0.001
Frequency tabulation for global aesthetic improvement assessmentSubject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement13022 (73.3)8 (26.7)0
33222 (68.8)10 (31.3)0
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment33226 (81.3)4 (12.5)2 (6.3)
VariableTime posttreatment (months)nMean [SD]Median (min, max)P valueaVery much improved, much improved, improved, n (%)No change, n (%)Worse, n (%)
Subject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement1302.90 [0.84]3.0 (1.0, 4.0)<0.001
3323.16 [0.72]3.0 (1.0, 4.0)<0.001
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment3323.06 [0.74]3.0 (1.5, 4.5)<0.001
Frequency tabulation for global aesthetic improvement assessmentSubject’s self-assessment for aesthetic improvement13022 (73.3)8 (26.7)0
33222 (68.8)10 (31.3)0
Clinician’s global aesthetic improvement assessment33226 (81.3)4 (12.5)2 (6.3)

SD, standard deviation.

aCalculated with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close