TABLE 1.

Summary of GRADE Ratings77

Study DesignQuality of EvidenceReasons to Downgrade
Randomized controlled trialaHighbRisk of bias
- Downgrade 1 level for serious risk of bias
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious risk of bias
Inconsistency
- Downgrade 1 level for serious inconsistency
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious inconsistency
Indirectness
- Downgrade 1 level for serious indirectness
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious indirectness
Imprecision
- Downgrade 1 level for serious imprecision
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious imprecision
Publication bias
- Downgrade 1 level for likely publication bias
- Downgrade 2 levels for very likely publication bias
Moderatec
Observational studydLowe
Very lowf
Study DesignQuality of EvidenceReasons to Downgrade
Randomized controlled trialaHighbRisk of bias
- Downgrade 1 level for serious risk of bias
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious risk of bias
Inconsistency
- Downgrade 1 level for serious inconsistency
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious inconsistency
Indirectness
- Downgrade 1 level for serious indirectness
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious indirectness
Imprecision
- Downgrade 1 level for serious imprecision
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious imprecision
Publication bias
- Downgrade 1 level for likely publication bias
- Downgrade 2 levels for very likely publication bias
Moderatec
Observational studydLowe
Very lowf

aRandomized controlled trials start with an initial GRADE rating of high and can be downgraded for problems with risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias.

bA GRADE rating of high implies that we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.

cA GRADE rating of moderate implies that we are moderately confident in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.

dObservational studies start with an initial GRADE rating of low and can be downgraded for problems with risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias.

eA GRADE rating of low implies that our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.

fA GRADE rating of very low implies that we have very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

TABLE 1.

Summary of GRADE Ratings77

Study DesignQuality of EvidenceReasons to Downgrade
Randomized controlled trialaHighbRisk of bias
- Downgrade 1 level for serious risk of bias
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious risk of bias
Inconsistency
- Downgrade 1 level for serious inconsistency
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious inconsistency
Indirectness
- Downgrade 1 level for serious indirectness
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious indirectness
Imprecision
- Downgrade 1 level for serious imprecision
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious imprecision
Publication bias
- Downgrade 1 level for likely publication bias
- Downgrade 2 levels for very likely publication bias
Moderatec
Observational studydLowe
Very lowf
Study DesignQuality of EvidenceReasons to Downgrade
Randomized controlled trialaHighbRisk of bias
- Downgrade 1 level for serious risk of bias
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious risk of bias
Inconsistency
- Downgrade 1 level for serious inconsistency
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious inconsistency
Indirectness
- Downgrade 1 level for serious indirectness
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious indirectness
Imprecision
- Downgrade 1 level for serious imprecision
- Downgrade 2 levels for very serious imprecision
Publication bias
- Downgrade 1 level for likely publication bias
- Downgrade 2 levels for very likely publication bias
Moderatec
Observational studydLowe
Very lowf

aRandomized controlled trials start with an initial GRADE rating of high and can be downgraded for problems with risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias.

bA GRADE rating of high implies that we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.

cA GRADE rating of moderate implies that we are moderately confident in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.

dObservational studies start with an initial GRADE rating of low and can be downgraded for problems with risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias.

eA GRADE rating of low implies that our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.

fA GRADE rating of very low implies that we have very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close