Table 3.
Open in new tab

DFAR scores’ prediction by case/control status

ModelCase/control status
BSE95% CIP value
DFAR totala−3.20.6−4.3 to −2.1<.001
DFAR totalb−1.50.6−2.7 to −0.3.013
DFAR neutrala−2.90.9−4.6 to −1.2.001
DFAR neutralb−0.60.9−2.4 to 1.2.506
DFAR happya−0.90.6−2.2 to 0.4.160
DFAR happyb0.30.7−1 to 1.7.639
DFAR feara−5.10.9−6.9 to −3.1<.001
DFAR fearb−3.31.1−5.3 to −1.2.002
DFAR angera−3.91−5.9 to −1.9<.001
DFAR angerb−2.31.1−4.6 to −0.1.041
ModelCase/control status
BSE95% CIP value
DFAR totala−3.20.6−4.3 to −2.1<.001
DFAR totalb−1.50.6−2.7 to −0.3.013
DFAR neutrala−2.90.9−4.6 to −1.2.001
DFAR neutralb−0.60.9−2.4 to 1.2.506
DFAR happya−0.90.6−2.2 to 0.4.160
DFAR happyb0.30.7−1 to 1.7.639
DFAR feara−5.10.9−6.9 to −3.1<.001
DFAR fearb−3.31.1−5.3 to −1.2.002
DFAR angera−3.91−5.9 to −1.9<.001
DFAR angerb−2.31.1−4.6 to −0.1.041

Note: DFAR, degraded facial affect recognition.

aAdjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, BFRT score.

bAdjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, BFRT score, IQ. Models were random-intercept models that included one random effect to allow DFAR scores to vary across countries.

Table 3.
Open in new tab

DFAR scores’ prediction by case/control status

ModelCase/control status
BSE95% CIP value
DFAR totala−3.20.6−4.3 to −2.1<.001
DFAR totalb−1.50.6−2.7 to −0.3.013
DFAR neutrala−2.90.9−4.6 to −1.2.001
DFAR neutralb−0.60.9−2.4 to 1.2.506
DFAR happya−0.90.6−2.2 to 0.4.160
DFAR happyb0.30.7−1 to 1.7.639
DFAR feara−5.10.9−6.9 to −3.1<.001
DFAR fearb−3.31.1−5.3 to −1.2.002
DFAR angera−3.91−5.9 to −1.9<.001
DFAR angerb−2.31.1−4.6 to −0.1.041
ModelCase/control status
BSE95% CIP value
DFAR totala−3.20.6−4.3 to −2.1<.001
DFAR totalb−1.50.6−2.7 to −0.3.013
DFAR neutrala−2.90.9−4.6 to −1.2.001
DFAR neutralb−0.60.9−2.4 to 1.2.506
DFAR happya−0.90.6−2.2 to 0.4.160
DFAR happyb0.30.7−1 to 1.7.639
DFAR feara−5.10.9−6.9 to −3.1<.001
DFAR fearb−3.31.1−5.3 to −1.2.002
DFAR angera−3.91−5.9 to −1.9<.001
DFAR angerb−2.31.1−4.6 to −0.1.041

Note: DFAR, degraded facial affect recognition.

aAdjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, BFRT score.

bAdjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, BFRT score, IQ. Models were random-intercept models that included one random effect to allow DFAR scores to vary across countries.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close