Table 1
Open in new tab

Summary of the statistical comparison of anatomic gsmax, SD, and stomatal length (l) between plants with different photosynthetic types either grown in phytotron or outdoors

gsmax
SD
l
gsmax
SD
l
PhytotronOutdoors
C3 versus Type I0.01<0.00010.010.64570.3958<0.0001
C3 versus Type II0.0007<0.0001<0.00010.0051<0.0001<0.0001
C3 versus C4-like<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
C3 versus C4<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type I versus Type II0.620.230.002<0.00010.00040.9989
Type I versus C4-like<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type I versus C4<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type II versus C4-like<0.00010.001<0.00010.04150.0478<0.0001
Type II versus C40.00030.0350.990.07910.24650.0001
C4-like versus C40.980.56<0.00010.94870.77440.8903
gsmax
SD
l
gsmax
SD
l
PhytotronOutdoors
C3 versus Type I0.01<0.00010.010.64570.3958<0.0001
C3 versus Type II0.0007<0.0001<0.00010.0051<0.0001<0.0001
C3 versus C4-like<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
C3 versus C4<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type I versus Type II0.620.230.002<0.00010.00040.9989
Type I versus C4-like<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type I versus C4<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type II versus C4-like<0.00010.001<0.00010.04150.0478<0.0001
Type II versus C40.00030.0350.990.07910.24650.0001
C4-like versus C40.980.56<0.00010.94870.77440.8903

The P-values are shown. The statistical test was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple test.

Table 1
Open in new tab

Summary of the statistical comparison of anatomic gsmax, SD, and stomatal length (l) between plants with different photosynthetic types either grown in phytotron or outdoors

gsmax
SD
l
gsmax
SD
l
PhytotronOutdoors
C3 versus Type I0.01<0.00010.010.64570.3958<0.0001
C3 versus Type II0.0007<0.0001<0.00010.0051<0.0001<0.0001
C3 versus C4-like<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
C3 versus C4<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type I versus Type II0.620.230.002<0.00010.00040.9989
Type I versus C4-like<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type I versus C4<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type II versus C4-like<0.00010.001<0.00010.04150.0478<0.0001
Type II versus C40.00030.0350.990.07910.24650.0001
C4-like versus C40.980.56<0.00010.94870.77440.8903
gsmax
SD
l
gsmax
SD
l
PhytotronOutdoors
C3 versus Type I0.01<0.00010.010.64570.3958<0.0001
C3 versus Type II0.0007<0.0001<0.00010.0051<0.0001<0.0001
C3 versus C4-like<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
C3 versus C4<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type I versus Type II0.620.230.002<0.00010.00040.9989
Type I versus C4-like<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type I versus C4<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
Type II versus C4-like<0.00010.001<0.00010.04150.0478<0.0001
Type II versus C40.00030.0350.990.07910.24650.0001
C4-like versus C40.980.56<0.00010.94870.77440.8903

The P-values are shown. The statistical test was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple test.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close