. | Impact as fraction of SD in control group (95% CI) . | p-value . | RW p-value . |
---|---|---|---|
Parental investment | 0.340|$^{***}$| | 0.000 | 0.000 |
(0.207, 0.472) | |||
Maternal knowledge (raw score) | -0.016 | 0.831 | 0.828 |
(-0.160, 0.128) | |||
Maternal self-efficacy (raw score) | 0.039 | 0.604 | 0.828 |
(-0.108, 0.186) | |||
ELCSA food insecurity status | -0.089 | 0.220 | 0.496 |
(-0.231, 0.052) |
. | Impact as fraction of SD in control group (95% CI) . | p-value . | RW p-value . |
---|---|---|---|
Parental investment | 0.340|$^{***}$| | 0.000 | 0.000 |
(0.207, 0.472) | |||
Maternal knowledge (raw score) | -0.016 | 0.831 | 0.828 |
(-0.160, 0.128) | |||
Maternal self-efficacy (raw score) | 0.039 | 0.604 | 0.828 |
(-0.108, 0.186) | |||
ELCSA food insecurity status | -0.089 | 0.220 | 0.496 |
(-0.231, 0.052) |
Notes: |$^{*} p < 0.10$|, |$^{**} p < 0.05$|, |$^{***} p < 0.01$| based on Romano-Wolf adjusted p-values (RW, Romano and Wolf 2005, 2016), considering all four hypotheses jointly. 95% confidence interval in parenthesis for two-tailed tests. OLS estimation; standard errors clustered by town. Impacts are measured in terms of SD of the control group. Covariates: child’s gender, an indicator of high household wealth index, maternal PPVT score, teenage mother, an indicator of high municipality population, previous attendance to a childcare center, and department and interviewer fixed effects. Parental investment is measured by a factor model estimated using the subscales of FCI Home Environment Quality, as discussed in Online Appendix D.
. | Impact as fraction of SD in control group (95% CI) . | p-value . | RW p-value . |
---|---|---|---|
Parental investment | 0.340|$^{***}$| | 0.000 | 0.000 |
(0.207, 0.472) | |||
Maternal knowledge (raw score) | -0.016 | 0.831 | 0.828 |
(-0.160, 0.128) | |||
Maternal self-efficacy (raw score) | 0.039 | 0.604 | 0.828 |
(-0.108, 0.186) | |||
ELCSA food insecurity status | -0.089 | 0.220 | 0.496 |
(-0.231, 0.052) |
. | Impact as fraction of SD in control group (95% CI) . | p-value . | RW p-value . |
---|---|---|---|
Parental investment | 0.340|$^{***}$| | 0.000 | 0.000 |
(0.207, 0.472) | |||
Maternal knowledge (raw score) | -0.016 | 0.831 | 0.828 |
(-0.160, 0.128) | |||
Maternal self-efficacy (raw score) | 0.039 | 0.604 | 0.828 |
(-0.108, 0.186) | |||
ELCSA food insecurity status | -0.089 | 0.220 | 0.496 |
(-0.231, 0.052) |
Notes: |$^{*} p < 0.10$|, |$^{**} p < 0.05$|, |$^{***} p < 0.01$| based on Romano-Wolf adjusted p-values (RW, Romano and Wolf 2005, 2016), considering all four hypotheses jointly. 95% confidence interval in parenthesis for two-tailed tests. OLS estimation; standard errors clustered by town. Impacts are measured in terms of SD of the control group. Covariates: child’s gender, an indicator of high household wealth index, maternal PPVT score, teenage mother, an indicator of high municipality population, previous attendance to a childcare center, and department and interviewer fixed effects. Parental investment is measured by a factor model estimated using the subscales of FCI Home Environment Quality, as discussed in Online Appendix D.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.