Table 9.

Program impacts on intermediate outcomes.

Impact as fraction of SD in control group (95% CI)p-valueRW p-value
Parental investment0.340|$^{***}$|0.0000.000
(0.207, 0.472)
Maternal knowledge (raw score)-0.0160.8310.828
(-0.160, 0.128)
Maternal self-efficacy (raw score)0.0390.6040.828
(-0.108, 0.186)
ELCSA food insecurity status-0.0890.2200.496
(-0.231, 0.052)
Impact as fraction of SD in control group (95% CI)p-valueRW p-value
Parental investment0.340|$^{***}$|0.0000.000
(0.207, 0.472)
Maternal knowledge (raw score)-0.0160.8310.828
(-0.160, 0.128)
Maternal self-efficacy (raw score)0.0390.6040.828
(-0.108, 0.186)
ELCSA food insecurity status-0.0890.2200.496
(-0.231, 0.052)

Notes: |$^{*} p < 0.10$|⁠, |$^{**} p < 0.05$|⁠, |$^{***} p < 0.01$| based on Romano-Wolf adjusted p-values (RW, Romano and Wolf 2005, 2016), considering all four hypotheses jointly. 95% confidence interval in parenthesis for two-tailed tests. OLS estimation; standard errors clustered by town. Impacts are measured in terms of SD of the control group. Covariates: child’s gender, an indicator of high household wealth index, maternal PPVT score, teenage mother, an indicator of high municipality population, previous attendance to a childcare center, and department and interviewer fixed effects. Parental investment is measured by a factor model estimated using the subscales of FCI Home Environment Quality, as discussed in Online Appendix D.

Table 9.

Program impacts on intermediate outcomes.

Impact as fraction of SD in control group (95% CI)p-valueRW p-value
Parental investment0.340|$^{***}$|0.0000.000
(0.207, 0.472)
Maternal knowledge (raw score)-0.0160.8310.828
(-0.160, 0.128)
Maternal self-efficacy (raw score)0.0390.6040.828
(-0.108, 0.186)
ELCSA food insecurity status-0.0890.2200.496
(-0.231, 0.052)
Impact as fraction of SD in control group (95% CI)p-valueRW p-value
Parental investment0.340|$^{***}$|0.0000.000
(0.207, 0.472)
Maternal knowledge (raw score)-0.0160.8310.828
(-0.160, 0.128)
Maternal self-efficacy (raw score)0.0390.6040.828
(-0.108, 0.186)
ELCSA food insecurity status-0.0890.2200.496
(-0.231, 0.052)

Notes: |$^{*} p < 0.10$|⁠, |$^{**} p < 0.05$|⁠, |$^{***} p < 0.01$| based on Romano-Wolf adjusted p-values (RW, Romano and Wolf 2005, 2016), considering all four hypotheses jointly. 95% confidence interval in parenthesis for two-tailed tests. OLS estimation; standard errors clustered by town. Impacts are measured in terms of SD of the control group. Covariates: child’s gender, an indicator of high household wealth index, maternal PPVT score, teenage mother, an indicator of high municipality population, previous attendance to a childcare center, and department and interviewer fixed effects. Parental investment is measured by a factor model estimated using the subscales of FCI Home Environment Quality, as discussed in Online Appendix D.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close