Table 5.

A “mock-up” of the framework at on the community scale (>1000 km2), comparing the wind energy to the scallop fishery; on this scale the effects of the regional windfarm development along the north–east US continental shelf are compared to the effects of the US Scallop Industry.

Community (>1 000 km2)
Cube cellObjectivesWindfarm Mid-Atlantic developmentUS Scallop Fishery
EcologicalScientific informationSummarized in Twigg et al. (2020)Extensive—example Final Amendment 10 (NEFMC 2004)
Habitat and communityPotential long-term alterationSummarized in Steward and Howarth (2016)
BenthicAggregations of IslandsIntense fishing influences seafloor structure and community
PelagicImpact major current patterns, Gulf Stream/Labrador currents.No effect
AcousticVarying levels of disturbanceCompounded from single vessel
ElectromagneticLimited understanding of effectUnknown
EconomicEfficiencyYes, competitive auction for leasesYes, two times above estimated Bmsy
ProsperityTransboundary carbon pollution reducedYes, supply of scallop provide high benefits consumer
ProsperityPrimarily transnational corporationsUS companies
Optimal harvest of energyNomination process and efficient producers (via lease competition)Yes, not overfished/overfishing
SocialFair and equitableCompetitive lease applicationLimited access fishery
Fair and equitableEffects navigationRegular fishing operation and navigation
Promote safetyYesYes
Structure and sustainabilityFor 2030 projection = 8 million households22 000 mt landings in 2020, US$486 million, protein for 300 000 people
InstitutionGovernanceDevelopingMagnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Legal obligationNone on regional levelFishery managed through range
Minimizing costCommon pool resource, governance costs unknownSignificant cost as a common pool resource
DuplicityYes, multilateral Construction and Operation plans (1 per site)No
Community (>1 000 km2)
Cube cellObjectivesWindfarm Mid-Atlantic developmentUS Scallop Fishery
EcologicalScientific informationSummarized in Twigg et al. (2020)Extensive—example Final Amendment 10 (NEFMC 2004)
Habitat and communityPotential long-term alterationSummarized in Steward and Howarth (2016)
BenthicAggregations of IslandsIntense fishing influences seafloor structure and community
PelagicImpact major current patterns, Gulf Stream/Labrador currents.No effect
AcousticVarying levels of disturbanceCompounded from single vessel
ElectromagneticLimited understanding of effectUnknown
EconomicEfficiencyYes, competitive auction for leasesYes, two times above estimated Bmsy
ProsperityTransboundary carbon pollution reducedYes, supply of scallop provide high benefits consumer
ProsperityPrimarily transnational corporationsUS companies
Optimal harvest of energyNomination process and efficient producers (via lease competition)Yes, not overfished/overfishing
SocialFair and equitableCompetitive lease applicationLimited access fishery
Fair and equitableEffects navigationRegular fishing operation and navigation
Promote safetyYesYes
Structure and sustainabilityFor 2030 projection = 8 million households22 000 mt landings in 2020, US$486 million, protein for 300 000 people
InstitutionGovernanceDevelopingMagnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Legal obligationNone on regional levelFishery managed through range
Minimizing costCommon pool resource, governance costs unknownSignificant cost as a common pool resource
DuplicityYes, multilateral Construction and Operation plans (1 per site)No
Table 5.

A “mock-up” of the framework at on the community scale (>1000 km2), comparing the wind energy to the scallop fishery; on this scale the effects of the regional windfarm development along the north–east US continental shelf are compared to the effects of the US Scallop Industry.

Community (>1 000 km2)
Cube cellObjectivesWindfarm Mid-Atlantic developmentUS Scallop Fishery
EcologicalScientific informationSummarized in Twigg et al. (2020)Extensive—example Final Amendment 10 (NEFMC 2004)
Habitat and communityPotential long-term alterationSummarized in Steward and Howarth (2016)
BenthicAggregations of IslandsIntense fishing influences seafloor structure and community
PelagicImpact major current patterns, Gulf Stream/Labrador currents.No effect
AcousticVarying levels of disturbanceCompounded from single vessel
ElectromagneticLimited understanding of effectUnknown
EconomicEfficiencyYes, competitive auction for leasesYes, two times above estimated Bmsy
ProsperityTransboundary carbon pollution reducedYes, supply of scallop provide high benefits consumer
ProsperityPrimarily transnational corporationsUS companies
Optimal harvest of energyNomination process and efficient producers (via lease competition)Yes, not overfished/overfishing
SocialFair and equitableCompetitive lease applicationLimited access fishery
Fair and equitableEffects navigationRegular fishing operation and navigation
Promote safetyYesYes
Structure and sustainabilityFor 2030 projection = 8 million households22 000 mt landings in 2020, US$486 million, protein for 300 000 people
InstitutionGovernanceDevelopingMagnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Legal obligationNone on regional levelFishery managed through range
Minimizing costCommon pool resource, governance costs unknownSignificant cost as a common pool resource
DuplicityYes, multilateral Construction and Operation plans (1 per site)No
Community (>1 000 km2)
Cube cellObjectivesWindfarm Mid-Atlantic developmentUS Scallop Fishery
EcologicalScientific informationSummarized in Twigg et al. (2020)Extensive—example Final Amendment 10 (NEFMC 2004)
Habitat and communityPotential long-term alterationSummarized in Steward and Howarth (2016)
BenthicAggregations of IslandsIntense fishing influences seafloor structure and community
PelagicImpact major current patterns, Gulf Stream/Labrador currents.No effect
AcousticVarying levels of disturbanceCompounded from single vessel
ElectromagneticLimited understanding of effectUnknown
EconomicEfficiencyYes, competitive auction for leasesYes, two times above estimated Bmsy
ProsperityTransboundary carbon pollution reducedYes, supply of scallop provide high benefits consumer
ProsperityPrimarily transnational corporationsUS companies
Optimal harvest of energyNomination process and efficient producers (via lease competition)Yes, not overfished/overfishing
SocialFair and equitableCompetitive lease applicationLimited access fishery
Fair and equitableEffects navigationRegular fishing operation and navigation
Promote safetyYesYes
Structure and sustainabilityFor 2030 projection = 8 million households22 000 mt landings in 2020, US$486 million, protein for 300 000 people
InstitutionGovernanceDevelopingMagnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Legal obligationNone on regional levelFishery managed through range
Minimizing costCommon pool resource, governance costs unknownSignificant cost as a common pool resource
DuplicityYes, multilateral Construction and Operation plans (1 per site)No
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close