Table 1.

Comparison of prophage discovery programs

ProgramProphages IdentifiedaFalse positivesProphages missedProphages split
PHASTER458010
VirSorter2+ CheckV431501
PhageBoost6317314
DEPhT (fast mode)29200
DEPhT (normal mode)27000
ProgramProphages IdentifiedaFalse positivesProphages missedProphages split
PHASTER458010
VirSorter2+ CheckV431501
PhageBoost6317314
DEPhT (fast mode)29200
DEPhT (normal mode)27000

aThe total number of prophage or prophage segments reported for each program using a test-set of 10 completely sequenced M. abscessus genomes. A total of 25 prophages was previously reported for these genomes, and the two additional prophages discovered with DEPhT in the standard mode were checked by manual inspection, and were clearly missed in the prior analysis.

Table 1.

Comparison of prophage discovery programs

ProgramProphages IdentifiedaFalse positivesProphages missedProphages split
PHASTER458010
VirSorter2+ CheckV431501
PhageBoost6317314
DEPhT (fast mode)29200
DEPhT (normal mode)27000
ProgramProphages IdentifiedaFalse positivesProphages missedProphages split
PHASTER458010
VirSorter2+ CheckV431501
PhageBoost6317314
DEPhT (fast mode)29200
DEPhT (normal mode)27000

aThe total number of prophage or prophage segments reported for each program using a test-set of 10 completely sequenced M. abscessus genomes. A total of 25 prophages was previously reported for these genomes, and the two additional prophages discovered with DEPhT in the standard mode were checked by manual inspection, and were clearly missed in the prior analysis.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close