Table 2.

Amplitude of forward tongue movement and enlargement of the cross-sectional area of the upper airway for each millimetre of mandible advancement for each MAS treatment response group

Tongue displacements per mm of mandibular advancement (partial Pearson P value)Overall
(n = 209 tagged MRI)
Responders
(n = 98 tagged MRI)
Partial-responders
(n = 31 tagged MRI)
Nonresponders
(n = 80 tagged MRI)
Oropharyngeal tongue anterior movement0.50 ± 0.08 mm
(r = 0.397, p < .001)
0.47 ± 0.13 mm
(r = 0.357, p < .01)
0.60 ± 0.15 mm
(r = 0.62, p = .01)
0.58 ± 0.13 mm
(r = 0.259, p = .027)
Nasopharyngeal tongue anterior movement0.25 ± 0.05 mm
(r = 0.299, p < .001)
0.40 ± 0.08 mm
(r = 0.508, p < .01)
-
(p = .38)
0.26 ± 0.10 mm
(r = 0.244, p < .01)
Change in oropharynx cross-sectional area4.02 ± 1.37 %
(r = 0.231, p = .001)
6.41 ± 2.12%
(r = 0.32, p = .001)
-
(p = .94)
-
(p = .25)
Change in nasopharynx cross-sectional area-
(p = .68)
-
(p = .32)
-
(p = .26)
-
(p = .24)
Tongue displacements per mm of mandibular advancement (partial Pearson P value)Overall
(n = 209 tagged MRI)
Responders
(n = 98 tagged MRI)
Partial-responders
(n = 31 tagged MRI)
Nonresponders
(n = 80 tagged MRI)
Oropharyngeal tongue anterior movement0.50 ± 0.08 mm
(r = 0.397, p < .001)
0.47 ± 0.13 mm
(r = 0.357, p < .01)
0.60 ± 0.15 mm
(r = 0.62, p = .01)
0.58 ± 0.13 mm
(r = 0.259, p = .027)
Nasopharyngeal tongue anterior movement0.25 ± 0.05 mm
(r = 0.299, p < .001)
0.40 ± 0.08 mm
(r = 0.508, p < .01)
-
(p = .38)
0.26 ± 0.10 mm
(r = 0.244, p < .01)
Change in oropharynx cross-sectional area4.02 ± 1.37 %
(r = 0.231, p = .001)
6.41 ± 2.12%
(r = 0.32, p = .001)
-
(p = .94)
-
(p = .25)
Change in nasopharynx cross-sectional area-
(p = .68)
-
(p = .32)
-
(p = .26)
-
(p = .24)

Mandibular advancement moved the tongue anteriorly to enlarge the oropharynx only for responders. Posterior tongue anterior movement due to mandibular advancement in partial- and nonresponders did not translate into upper airway enlargement. All data are presented as mean ± standard errors. All partial Pearson correlations between variables and mandibular advancement reported in this table between brackets were controlled for age, BMI and gender, and statistically accounted for the multiple measurements made within the same participants.

Table 2.

Amplitude of forward tongue movement and enlargement of the cross-sectional area of the upper airway for each millimetre of mandible advancement for each MAS treatment response group

Tongue displacements per mm of mandibular advancement (partial Pearson P value)Overall
(n = 209 tagged MRI)
Responders
(n = 98 tagged MRI)
Partial-responders
(n = 31 tagged MRI)
Nonresponders
(n = 80 tagged MRI)
Oropharyngeal tongue anterior movement0.50 ± 0.08 mm
(r = 0.397, p < .001)
0.47 ± 0.13 mm
(r = 0.357, p < .01)
0.60 ± 0.15 mm
(r = 0.62, p = .01)
0.58 ± 0.13 mm
(r = 0.259, p = .027)
Nasopharyngeal tongue anterior movement0.25 ± 0.05 mm
(r = 0.299, p < .001)
0.40 ± 0.08 mm
(r = 0.508, p < .01)
-
(p = .38)
0.26 ± 0.10 mm
(r = 0.244, p < .01)
Change in oropharynx cross-sectional area4.02 ± 1.37 %
(r = 0.231, p = .001)
6.41 ± 2.12%
(r = 0.32, p = .001)
-
(p = .94)
-
(p = .25)
Change in nasopharynx cross-sectional area-
(p = .68)
-
(p = .32)
-
(p = .26)
-
(p = .24)
Tongue displacements per mm of mandibular advancement (partial Pearson P value)Overall
(n = 209 tagged MRI)
Responders
(n = 98 tagged MRI)
Partial-responders
(n = 31 tagged MRI)
Nonresponders
(n = 80 tagged MRI)
Oropharyngeal tongue anterior movement0.50 ± 0.08 mm
(r = 0.397, p < .001)
0.47 ± 0.13 mm
(r = 0.357, p < .01)
0.60 ± 0.15 mm
(r = 0.62, p = .01)
0.58 ± 0.13 mm
(r = 0.259, p = .027)
Nasopharyngeal tongue anterior movement0.25 ± 0.05 mm
(r = 0.299, p < .001)
0.40 ± 0.08 mm
(r = 0.508, p < .01)
-
(p = .38)
0.26 ± 0.10 mm
(r = 0.244, p < .01)
Change in oropharynx cross-sectional area4.02 ± 1.37 %
(r = 0.231, p = .001)
6.41 ± 2.12%
(r = 0.32, p = .001)
-
(p = .94)
-
(p = .25)
Change in nasopharynx cross-sectional area-
(p = .68)
-
(p = .32)
-
(p = .26)
-
(p = .24)

Mandibular advancement moved the tongue anteriorly to enlarge the oropharynx only for responders. Posterior tongue anterior movement due to mandibular advancement in partial- and nonresponders did not translate into upper airway enlargement. All data are presented as mean ± standard errors. All partial Pearson correlations between variables and mandibular advancement reported in this table between brackets were controlled for age, BMI and gender, and statistically accounted for the multiple measurements made within the same participants.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close