Table 3.

Multiphase Growth Curve Models Predicting Changes in Older Adults’ Depressive Symptoms in Response to Spouses’ Dementia Onset

Model 1Model 2
VariableB (SE)B (SE)
Fixed effects
 Intercept (β 0i)1.20*** (0.12)1.39 (0.79)
  Overall positive marital qualitya−0.06 (0.17)
  Overall negative marital qualitya0.49** (0.15)
  Discrepant positive marital qualityb−0.10 (0.11)
  Discrepant negative marital qualityb−0.07 (0.09)
 Time-to/from-dementia (β 1i)0.00 (0.03)0.00 (0.02)
 Reaction (β 2i)0.31* (0.12)1.48 (1.00)
  × Overall positive marital qualitya−0.24 (0.19)
  × Overall negative marital qualitya−0.35* (0.17)
  × Discrepant positive marital qualityb0.08 (0.12)
  × Discrepant negative marital qualityb0.12 (0.11)
 Time-to/from-dementia × Reaction (β 3i)0.05 (0.03)0.02 (0.03)
Random effects
 Intercept variance1.48*** (0.26)0.65** (0.23)
 Time-to/from-dementia variance0.00 (0.01)0.01 (0.01)
 Reaction variance0.39 (0.42)
 Residual variance2.02*** (0.09)1.37*** (0.08)
−2 log likelihood7,090.64,897.2
Model 1Model 2
VariableB (SE)B (SE)
Fixed effects
 Intercept (β 0i)1.20*** (0.12)1.39 (0.79)
  Overall positive marital qualitya−0.06 (0.17)
  Overall negative marital qualitya0.49** (0.15)
  Discrepant positive marital qualityb−0.10 (0.11)
  Discrepant negative marital qualityb−0.07 (0.09)
 Time-to/from-dementia (β 1i)0.00 (0.03)0.00 (0.02)
 Reaction (β 2i)0.31* (0.12)1.48 (1.00)
  × Overall positive marital qualitya−0.24 (0.19)
  × Overall negative marital qualitya−0.35* (0.17)
  × Discrepant positive marital qualityb0.08 (0.12)
  × Discrepant negative marital qualityb0.12 (0.11)
 Time-to/from-dementia × Reaction (β 3i)0.05 (0.03)0.02 (0.03)
Random effects
 Intercept variance1.48*** (0.26)0.65** (0.23)
 Time-to/from-dementia variance0.00 (0.01)0.01 (0.01)
 Reaction variance0.39 (0.42)
 Residual variance2.02*** (0.09)1.37*** (0.08)
−2 log likelihood7,090.64,897.2

Notes: SE = standard error. Participant n = 410. Intercept and reaction were fully adjusted for covariates in Model 2 (not shown in table). The level-1 equation for individual i’s depressive symptoms at time t: Depressive symptomsti = β 0i + β 1i (time-to/from-spouse-dementiati) + β 2i (reactionti) + β 3i (time-to/from-spouse-dementiati × reactionti) + eti; the intercept β 0i refers to individual i’s depressive symptoms in the year of spousal dementia onset; β 1i is an individual-specific slope indicating rates of linear change in individual i’s depressive symptoms prior to spousal dementia; β 2i captures the effect of spousal dementia on individual i’s depressive symptoms; β 3i examines whether rates of change in individual i’s depressive symptoms differed prior to and post spousal dementia; eti indicates residual error.

aAveraged across partners.

bSelf-rating subtracted by partner rating.

*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.

Table 3.

Multiphase Growth Curve Models Predicting Changes in Older Adults’ Depressive Symptoms in Response to Spouses’ Dementia Onset

Model 1Model 2
VariableB (SE)B (SE)
Fixed effects
 Intercept (β 0i)1.20*** (0.12)1.39 (0.79)
  Overall positive marital qualitya−0.06 (0.17)
  Overall negative marital qualitya0.49** (0.15)
  Discrepant positive marital qualityb−0.10 (0.11)
  Discrepant negative marital qualityb−0.07 (0.09)
 Time-to/from-dementia (β 1i)0.00 (0.03)0.00 (0.02)
 Reaction (β 2i)0.31* (0.12)1.48 (1.00)
  × Overall positive marital qualitya−0.24 (0.19)
  × Overall negative marital qualitya−0.35* (0.17)
  × Discrepant positive marital qualityb0.08 (0.12)
  × Discrepant negative marital qualityb0.12 (0.11)
 Time-to/from-dementia × Reaction (β 3i)0.05 (0.03)0.02 (0.03)
Random effects
 Intercept variance1.48*** (0.26)0.65** (0.23)
 Time-to/from-dementia variance0.00 (0.01)0.01 (0.01)
 Reaction variance0.39 (0.42)
 Residual variance2.02*** (0.09)1.37*** (0.08)
−2 log likelihood7,090.64,897.2
Model 1Model 2
VariableB (SE)B (SE)
Fixed effects
 Intercept (β 0i)1.20*** (0.12)1.39 (0.79)
  Overall positive marital qualitya−0.06 (0.17)
  Overall negative marital qualitya0.49** (0.15)
  Discrepant positive marital qualityb−0.10 (0.11)
  Discrepant negative marital qualityb−0.07 (0.09)
 Time-to/from-dementia (β 1i)0.00 (0.03)0.00 (0.02)
 Reaction (β 2i)0.31* (0.12)1.48 (1.00)
  × Overall positive marital qualitya−0.24 (0.19)
  × Overall negative marital qualitya−0.35* (0.17)
  × Discrepant positive marital qualityb0.08 (0.12)
  × Discrepant negative marital qualityb0.12 (0.11)
 Time-to/from-dementia × Reaction (β 3i)0.05 (0.03)0.02 (0.03)
Random effects
 Intercept variance1.48*** (0.26)0.65** (0.23)
 Time-to/from-dementia variance0.00 (0.01)0.01 (0.01)
 Reaction variance0.39 (0.42)
 Residual variance2.02*** (0.09)1.37*** (0.08)
−2 log likelihood7,090.64,897.2

Notes: SE = standard error. Participant n = 410. Intercept and reaction were fully adjusted for covariates in Model 2 (not shown in table). The level-1 equation for individual i’s depressive symptoms at time t: Depressive symptomsti = β 0i + β 1i (time-to/from-spouse-dementiati) + β 2i (reactionti) + β 3i (time-to/from-spouse-dementiati × reactionti) + eti; the intercept β 0i refers to individual i’s depressive symptoms in the year of spousal dementia onset; β 1i is an individual-specific slope indicating rates of linear change in individual i’s depressive symptoms prior to spousal dementia; β 2i captures the effect of spousal dementia on individual i’s depressive symptoms; β 3i examines whether rates of change in individual i’s depressive symptoms differed prior to and post spousal dementia; eti indicates residual error.

aAveraged across partners.

bSelf-rating subtracted by partner rating.

*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close