Table 2.

Uncontrolled studies of surgery, renal revascularization or medical therapy for ARVD over the past decades

AuthorYearPatients (n)Inclusion criteriaFollow-up in monthsTreatment modalityPrimary end-pointKey clinical outcomesComments
Sheps et al. [5]196554 (22 patients had FMD)
  • – RAS on renal angiography

  • – hypertension

20.3 (Mean)MedicalChange in renal function and BP control from baseline and mortality
  • – 32/49 (65%)—controlled BPa

  • – 5/54 (9%)—died (all had underlying ARVD)

Improved retinal hypertensive changes were used as a correlate of controlled BP
Wollenweber et al. [4]1968109
  • – Unilateral or bilateral renal atherosclerosis

42 (mean)63—medical
46—surgery
Change in renal function and BP control from baseline, incidence of cardiovascular events and survival
  • – Medical group—18/63 (29%)—controlled BPa

  • – Surgical group—25/46 (54%)—controlled BPa

  • – Medical group—16/63 (25%)—overall deaths

  • – Surgical group—10/46 (22%)—overall deaths

Advanced ARVD was associated with more severe extrarenal atherosclerosis and a poorer prognosis.
Dean et al. [17]198141
  • – 40–65 years

  • – hypertensive

  • – surgically correctable RAS

  • – positive results from RVRA or SRFS

44 (mean)medical10% loss in renal length, 100% increase in serum creatinine and 50% decrease in isotopic GFR during follow-up
  • – 12/41 (29%)—Decrease in GFR between 25 and 50%.

  • – 14/41 (37%)—lost >10% renal length

– 17/41 (41%) required surgery due to deterioration in renal function or loss of renal length, despite adequate BP control in 15/17 (88%) of patients.
Novick et al. [18]198451
  • – atherosclerotic renovascular disease

  • – controlled BP

46 (mean)surgeryChange in renal function from baseline and survival post-surgical revascularization
  • – 31/46 (67%)—Improved renal function

  • – 4/46 (9%)—Deterioration in renal function:

  • – 5/51 (10%) died.

In selected patients with ARVD, renal revascularization may improve survival
Brawn et al. [19]198729
  • – RVH

  • – 6 patients had FMD, 2 indeterminate pathology

20 (mean)29 – PTRA
25 – (Non-randomised ‘controls’)—medical
Change in BP from baseline
  • – Diastolic BP <90 mmHga: 4/14 (29%)

  • – Failed procedure: 14/28 (50%)

  • – Early adverse events: 3/18 (17%)

25 hypertensive patients without underlying renovascular disease were used as non-randomized ‘controls’—8/25 (32%) had spontaneous improvement in BP.
Dean et al. [7]199158
  • – ischaemic nephropathy

  • – sCr ≥1.8 mg/dL

19.8 (Mean)surgeryChange in eGFR by at least 20% from baseline at least 1 week post-operatively and change in BP and anti-hypertensive medication requirements at least 8 weeks post-operatively.
  • – 8/53 (15%)- ‘cured’a hypertension

  • – 31/58 (59%)—Improved eGFR (>20%)

  • – 7/58 (13%)—Deterioration in eGFR (<20%)

    5/58 (9%)—died

Patients with bilateral disease had a significant improvement in eGFR after intervention (P = 0.0001) unlike patients with unilateral disease.
Van de Ven et al. [20]199524– Ostial ARVD (≥50%) with refractory hypertension or rise in sCr with ACEi6Primary/secondary PTRAS (Palmaz)Primary success rate and restenosis at 6 monthsDiastolic BP <90 mmHg with anti-hypertensive medication: 15/24 (63%)
ESKD (cholesterol embolization): 2/24 (8.3%)
  • – Death: 2/24 (8.3%)

ACEi could be restarted without causing deterioration in renal function.
Harden et al. [10]199732
  • – Ostial RAS (>50%), failed PTRA, dissection or occlusion

  • – Unexplained RF

17 (Mean follow-up before stenting)
8 (Mean follow-up after stenting)
Primary/Secondary PTRAS (Palmaz)20% Change in serum creatinine from baseline, initiation of renal replacement therapy and death
  • – Improved RFc:11/32 (34%)

  • – Restenosis: 3/24 (12%)

  • – Complications: 6/32 (19%)

  • – Operative mortality: 1/32 (3%)

Improved slope of deterioration of renal function compared with that before stenting.
Chabova et al. [21]200068
  • – >70% RAS

  • – Hypertension

38.9 (Mean)68—MedicalChange in renal function and BP from baseline and clinical outcomes at termination
  • – Refractory hypertension: 2/68 (3%)

  • – ESKD (attributed to progressive ARVD in 2 patients): 6/68 (8.8%)

  • – Death: 19/68 (27.9%)

Patients with bilateral renal artery disease had a higher mortality (P = 0.07) and a higher risk of deteriorating renal function than patients with unilateral disease.
Losito et al. [11]2005195– ARAS >50%54 (mean)136—PTRA/PTRAS
54—medical treatment
Change in renal function and BP from baseline and survivalPTRA—slightly lower increase in creatinine over time (P = 0.041) and better BP control (P < 0.05).
ESKD:
– 13/136 (9.5%)—PTRA/PTRAS; 7/54 (13%)—medical treatment
Intervention had no effect on survival or incidence of ESKD. Baseline creatinine, rather than degree of RAS, was a predictor of reaching ESKD.
Jaff et al. [22] (HERCULES)2012202
  • – RAS ≥60% or suboptimal PTRA result with significant residual stenosis

  • – Uncontrolled BP >140/90 mmHg despite Rx

9PTRAS (Herculink Elite stent)9-Month binary restenosis rate as determined by duplex ultrasound and/or angiographyRestenosis at 9 months
  • – 22/209 (10.5%)

BP control at 9 months:
  • – Statistically significant drop in SBP (P < 0.0001) with no change in medication

1/202 (0.5%)—died
2/202 (1%)—atheromatous embolization and kidney injury
This cohort of patients had refractory hypertension despite the fact that 75% were taking ACEi/ARB. Revascularization optimized BP control in this selected cohort, and degree of BP reduction correlated with baseline BP. There was no correlation between BP response to revascularization and baseline BNP or BNP reduction.
AuthorYearPatients (n)Inclusion criteriaFollow-up in monthsTreatment modalityPrimary end-pointKey clinical outcomesComments
Sheps et al. [5]196554 (22 patients had FMD)
  • – RAS on renal angiography

  • – hypertension

20.3 (Mean)MedicalChange in renal function and BP control from baseline and mortality
  • – 32/49 (65%)—controlled BPa

  • – 5/54 (9%)—died (all had underlying ARVD)

Improved retinal hypertensive changes were used as a correlate of controlled BP
Wollenweber et al. [4]1968109
  • – Unilateral or bilateral renal atherosclerosis

42 (mean)63—medical
46—surgery
Change in renal function and BP control from baseline, incidence of cardiovascular events and survival
  • – Medical group—18/63 (29%)—controlled BPa

  • – Surgical group—25/46 (54%)—controlled BPa

  • – Medical group—16/63 (25%)—overall deaths

  • – Surgical group—10/46 (22%)—overall deaths

Advanced ARVD was associated with more severe extrarenal atherosclerosis and a poorer prognosis.
Dean et al. [17]198141
  • – 40–65 years

  • – hypertensive

  • – surgically correctable RAS

  • – positive results from RVRA or SRFS

44 (mean)medical10% loss in renal length, 100% increase in serum creatinine and 50% decrease in isotopic GFR during follow-up
  • – 12/41 (29%)—Decrease in GFR between 25 and 50%.

  • – 14/41 (37%)—lost >10% renal length

– 17/41 (41%) required surgery due to deterioration in renal function or loss of renal length, despite adequate BP control in 15/17 (88%) of patients.
Novick et al. [18]198451
  • – atherosclerotic renovascular disease

  • – controlled BP

46 (mean)surgeryChange in renal function from baseline and survival post-surgical revascularization
  • – 31/46 (67%)—Improved renal function

  • – 4/46 (9%)—Deterioration in renal function:

  • – 5/51 (10%) died.

In selected patients with ARVD, renal revascularization may improve survival
Brawn et al. [19]198729
  • – RVH

  • – 6 patients had FMD, 2 indeterminate pathology

20 (mean)29 – PTRA
25 – (Non-randomised ‘controls’)—medical
Change in BP from baseline
  • – Diastolic BP <90 mmHga: 4/14 (29%)

  • – Failed procedure: 14/28 (50%)

  • – Early adverse events: 3/18 (17%)

25 hypertensive patients without underlying renovascular disease were used as non-randomized ‘controls’—8/25 (32%) had spontaneous improvement in BP.
Dean et al. [7]199158
  • – ischaemic nephropathy

  • – sCr ≥1.8 mg/dL

19.8 (Mean)surgeryChange in eGFR by at least 20% from baseline at least 1 week post-operatively and change in BP and anti-hypertensive medication requirements at least 8 weeks post-operatively.
  • – 8/53 (15%)- ‘cured’a hypertension

  • – 31/58 (59%)—Improved eGFR (>20%)

  • – 7/58 (13%)—Deterioration in eGFR (<20%)

    5/58 (9%)—died

Patients with bilateral disease had a significant improvement in eGFR after intervention (P = 0.0001) unlike patients with unilateral disease.
Van de Ven et al. [20]199524– Ostial ARVD (≥50%) with refractory hypertension or rise in sCr with ACEi6Primary/secondary PTRAS (Palmaz)Primary success rate and restenosis at 6 monthsDiastolic BP <90 mmHg with anti-hypertensive medication: 15/24 (63%)
ESKD (cholesterol embolization): 2/24 (8.3%)
  • – Death: 2/24 (8.3%)

ACEi could be restarted without causing deterioration in renal function.
Harden et al. [10]199732
  • – Ostial RAS (>50%), failed PTRA, dissection or occlusion

  • – Unexplained RF

17 (Mean follow-up before stenting)
8 (Mean follow-up after stenting)
Primary/Secondary PTRAS (Palmaz)20% Change in serum creatinine from baseline, initiation of renal replacement therapy and death
  • – Improved RFc:11/32 (34%)

  • – Restenosis: 3/24 (12%)

  • – Complications: 6/32 (19%)

  • – Operative mortality: 1/32 (3%)

Improved slope of deterioration of renal function compared with that before stenting.
Chabova et al. [21]200068
  • – >70% RAS

  • – Hypertension

38.9 (Mean)68—MedicalChange in renal function and BP from baseline and clinical outcomes at termination
  • – Refractory hypertension: 2/68 (3%)

  • – ESKD (attributed to progressive ARVD in 2 patients): 6/68 (8.8%)

  • – Death: 19/68 (27.9%)

Patients with bilateral renal artery disease had a higher mortality (P = 0.07) and a higher risk of deteriorating renal function than patients with unilateral disease.
Losito et al. [11]2005195– ARAS >50%54 (mean)136—PTRA/PTRAS
54—medical treatment
Change in renal function and BP from baseline and survivalPTRA—slightly lower increase in creatinine over time (P = 0.041) and better BP control (P < 0.05).
ESKD:
– 13/136 (9.5%)—PTRA/PTRAS; 7/54 (13%)—medical treatment
Intervention had no effect on survival or incidence of ESKD. Baseline creatinine, rather than degree of RAS, was a predictor of reaching ESKD.
Jaff et al. [22] (HERCULES)2012202
  • – RAS ≥60% or suboptimal PTRA result with significant residual stenosis

  • – Uncontrolled BP >140/90 mmHg despite Rx

9PTRAS (Herculink Elite stent)9-Month binary restenosis rate as determined by duplex ultrasound and/or angiographyRestenosis at 9 months
  • – 22/209 (10.5%)

BP control at 9 months:
  • – Statistically significant drop in SBP (P < 0.0001) with no change in medication

1/202 (0.5%)—died
2/202 (1%)—atheromatous embolization and kidney injury
This cohort of patients had refractory hypertension despite the fact that 75% were taking ACEi/ARB. Revascularization optimized BP control in this selected cohort, and degree of BP reduction correlated with baseline BP. There was no correlation between BP response to revascularization and baseline BNP or BNP reduction.

ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARAS, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ARVD, atherosclerotic renovascular disease; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; BP, blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; FMD, fibromuscular dysplasia; PTRA, percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty; PTRAS, percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty and stenting; RAS, renal artery stenosis; RF, renal function; RVH, renovascular hypertension; Rx, treatment; sCr, serum creatinine.

aDefined as diastolic BP <95 or 90 mmHg with no anti-hypertensive medication.

bDefined as diastolic BP <90 mmHg.

csCr decreased by >20% from baseline.

Table 2.

Uncontrolled studies of surgery, renal revascularization or medical therapy for ARVD over the past decades

AuthorYearPatients (n)Inclusion criteriaFollow-up in monthsTreatment modalityPrimary end-pointKey clinical outcomesComments
Sheps et al. [5]196554 (22 patients had FMD)
  • – RAS on renal angiography

  • – hypertension

20.3 (Mean)MedicalChange in renal function and BP control from baseline and mortality
  • – 32/49 (65%)—controlled BPa

  • – 5/54 (9%)—died (all had underlying ARVD)

Improved retinal hypertensive changes were used as a correlate of controlled BP
Wollenweber et al. [4]1968109
  • – Unilateral or bilateral renal atherosclerosis

42 (mean)63—medical
46—surgery
Change in renal function and BP control from baseline, incidence of cardiovascular events and survival
  • – Medical group—18/63 (29%)—controlled BPa

  • – Surgical group—25/46 (54%)—controlled BPa

  • – Medical group—16/63 (25%)—overall deaths

  • – Surgical group—10/46 (22%)—overall deaths

Advanced ARVD was associated with more severe extrarenal atherosclerosis and a poorer prognosis.
Dean et al. [17]198141
  • – 40–65 years

  • – hypertensive

  • – surgically correctable RAS

  • – positive results from RVRA or SRFS

44 (mean)medical10% loss in renal length, 100% increase in serum creatinine and 50% decrease in isotopic GFR during follow-up
  • – 12/41 (29%)—Decrease in GFR between 25 and 50%.

  • – 14/41 (37%)—lost >10% renal length

– 17/41 (41%) required surgery due to deterioration in renal function or loss of renal length, despite adequate BP control in 15/17 (88%) of patients.
Novick et al. [18]198451
  • – atherosclerotic renovascular disease

  • – controlled BP

46 (mean)surgeryChange in renal function from baseline and survival post-surgical revascularization
  • – 31/46 (67%)—Improved renal function

  • – 4/46 (9%)—Deterioration in renal function:

  • – 5/51 (10%) died.

In selected patients with ARVD, renal revascularization may improve survival
Brawn et al. [19]198729
  • – RVH

  • – 6 patients had FMD, 2 indeterminate pathology

20 (mean)29 – PTRA
25 – (Non-randomised ‘controls’)—medical
Change in BP from baseline
  • – Diastolic BP <90 mmHga: 4/14 (29%)

  • – Failed procedure: 14/28 (50%)

  • – Early adverse events: 3/18 (17%)

25 hypertensive patients without underlying renovascular disease were used as non-randomized ‘controls’—8/25 (32%) had spontaneous improvement in BP.
Dean et al. [7]199158
  • – ischaemic nephropathy

  • – sCr ≥1.8 mg/dL

19.8 (Mean)surgeryChange in eGFR by at least 20% from baseline at least 1 week post-operatively and change in BP and anti-hypertensive medication requirements at least 8 weeks post-operatively.
  • – 8/53 (15%)- ‘cured’a hypertension

  • – 31/58 (59%)—Improved eGFR (>20%)

  • – 7/58 (13%)—Deterioration in eGFR (<20%)

    5/58 (9%)—died

Patients with bilateral disease had a significant improvement in eGFR after intervention (P = 0.0001) unlike patients with unilateral disease.
Van de Ven et al. [20]199524– Ostial ARVD (≥50%) with refractory hypertension or rise in sCr with ACEi6Primary/secondary PTRAS (Palmaz)Primary success rate and restenosis at 6 monthsDiastolic BP <90 mmHg with anti-hypertensive medication: 15/24 (63%)
ESKD (cholesterol embolization): 2/24 (8.3%)
  • – Death: 2/24 (8.3%)

ACEi could be restarted without causing deterioration in renal function.
Harden et al. [10]199732
  • – Ostial RAS (>50%), failed PTRA, dissection or occlusion

  • – Unexplained RF

17 (Mean follow-up before stenting)
8 (Mean follow-up after stenting)
Primary/Secondary PTRAS (Palmaz)20% Change in serum creatinine from baseline, initiation of renal replacement therapy and death
  • – Improved RFc:11/32 (34%)

  • – Restenosis: 3/24 (12%)

  • – Complications: 6/32 (19%)

  • – Operative mortality: 1/32 (3%)

Improved slope of deterioration of renal function compared with that before stenting.
Chabova et al. [21]200068
  • – >70% RAS

  • – Hypertension

38.9 (Mean)68—MedicalChange in renal function and BP from baseline and clinical outcomes at termination
  • – Refractory hypertension: 2/68 (3%)

  • – ESKD (attributed to progressive ARVD in 2 patients): 6/68 (8.8%)

  • – Death: 19/68 (27.9%)

Patients with bilateral renal artery disease had a higher mortality (P = 0.07) and a higher risk of deteriorating renal function than patients with unilateral disease.
Losito et al. [11]2005195– ARAS >50%54 (mean)136—PTRA/PTRAS
54—medical treatment
Change in renal function and BP from baseline and survivalPTRA—slightly lower increase in creatinine over time (P = 0.041) and better BP control (P < 0.05).
ESKD:
– 13/136 (9.5%)—PTRA/PTRAS; 7/54 (13%)—medical treatment
Intervention had no effect on survival or incidence of ESKD. Baseline creatinine, rather than degree of RAS, was a predictor of reaching ESKD.
Jaff et al. [22] (HERCULES)2012202
  • – RAS ≥60% or suboptimal PTRA result with significant residual stenosis

  • – Uncontrolled BP >140/90 mmHg despite Rx

9PTRAS (Herculink Elite stent)9-Month binary restenosis rate as determined by duplex ultrasound and/or angiographyRestenosis at 9 months
  • – 22/209 (10.5%)

BP control at 9 months:
  • – Statistically significant drop in SBP (P < 0.0001) with no change in medication

1/202 (0.5%)—died
2/202 (1%)—atheromatous embolization and kidney injury
This cohort of patients had refractory hypertension despite the fact that 75% were taking ACEi/ARB. Revascularization optimized BP control in this selected cohort, and degree of BP reduction correlated with baseline BP. There was no correlation between BP response to revascularization and baseline BNP or BNP reduction.
AuthorYearPatients (n)Inclusion criteriaFollow-up in monthsTreatment modalityPrimary end-pointKey clinical outcomesComments
Sheps et al. [5]196554 (22 patients had FMD)
  • – RAS on renal angiography

  • – hypertension

20.3 (Mean)MedicalChange in renal function and BP control from baseline and mortality
  • – 32/49 (65%)—controlled BPa

  • – 5/54 (9%)—died (all had underlying ARVD)

Improved retinal hypertensive changes were used as a correlate of controlled BP
Wollenweber et al. [4]1968109
  • – Unilateral or bilateral renal atherosclerosis

42 (mean)63—medical
46—surgery
Change in renal function and BP control from baseline, incidence of cardiovascular events and survival
  • – Medical group—18/63 (29%)—controlled BPa

  • – Surgical group—25/46 (54%)—controlled BPa

  • – Medical group—16/63 (25%)—overall deaths

  • – Surgical group—10/46 (22%)—overall deaths

Advanced ARVD was associated with more severe extrarenal atherosclerosis and a poorer prognosis.
Dean et al. [17]198141
  • – 40–65 years

  • – hypertensive

  • – surgically correctable RAS

  • – positive results from RVRA or SRFS

44 (mean)medical10% loss in renal length, 100% increase in serum creatinine and 50% decrease in isotopic GFR during follow-up
  • – 12/41 (29%)—Decrease in GFR between 25 and 50%.

  • – 14/41 (37%)—lost >10% renal length

– 17/41 (41%) required surgery due to deterioration in renal function or loss of renal length, despite adequate BP control in 15/17 (88%) of patients.
Novick et al. [18]198451
  • – atherosclerotic renovascular disease

  • – controlled BP

46 (mean)surgeryChange in renal function from baseline and survival post-surgical revascularization
  • – 31/46 (67%)—Improved renal function

  • – 4/46 (9%)—Deterioration in renal function:

  • – 5/51 (10%) died.

In selected patients with ARVD, renal revascularization may improve survival
Brawn et al. [19]198729
  • – RVH

  • – 6 patients had FMD, 2 indeterminate pathology

20 (mean)29 – PTRA
25 – (Non-randomised ‘controls’)—medical
Change in BP from baseline
  • – Diastolic BP <90 mmHga: 4/14 (29%)

  • – Failed procedure: 14/28 (50%)

  • – Early adverse events: 3/18 (17%)

25 hypertensive patients without underlying renovascular disease were used as non-randomized ‘controls’—8/25 (32%) had spontaneous improvement in BP.
Dean et al. [7]199158
  • – ischaemic nephropathy

  • – sCr ≥1.8 mg/dL

19.8 (Mean)surgeryChange in eGFR by at least 20% from baseline at least 1 week post-operatively and change in BP and anti-hypertensive medication requirements at least 8 weeks post-operatively.
  • – 8/53 (15%)- ‘cured’a hypertension

  • – 31/58 (59%)—Improved eGFR (>20%)

  • – 7/58 (13%)—Deterioration in eGFR (<20%)

    5/58 (9%)—died

Patients with bilateral disease had a significant improvement in eGFR after intervention (P = 0.0001) unlike patients with unilateral disease.
Van de Ven et al. [20]199524– Ostial ARVD (≥50%) with refractory hypertension or rise in sCr with ACEi6Primary/secondary PTRAS (Palmaz)Primary success rate and restenosis at 6 monthsDiastolic BP <90 mmHg with anti-hypertensive medication: 15/24 (63%)
ESKD (cholesterol embolization): 2/24 (8.3%)
  • – Death: 2/24 (8.3%)

ACEi could be restarted without causing deterioration in renal function.
Harden et al. [10]199732
  • – Ostial RAS (>50%), failed PTRA, dissection or occlusion

  • – Unexplained RF

17 (Mean follow-up before stenting)
8 (Mean follow-up after stenting)
Primary/Secondary PTRAS (Palmaz)20% Change in serum creatinine from baseline, initiation of renal replacement therapy and death
  • – Improved RFc:11/32 (34%)

  • – Restenosis: 3/24 (12%)

  • – Complications: 6/32 (19%)

  • – Operative mortality: 1/32 (3%)

Improved slope of deterioration of renal function compared with that before stenting.
Chabova et al. [21]200068
  • – >70% RAS

  • – Hypertension

38.9 (Mean)68—MedicalChange in renal function and BP from baseline and clinical outcomes at termination
  • – Refractory hypertension: 2/68 (3%)

  • – ESKD (attributed to progressive ARVD in 2 patients): 6/68 (8.8%)

  • – Death: 19/68 (27.9%)

Patients with bilateral renal artery disease had a higher mortality (P = 0.07) and a higher risk of deteriorating renal function than patients with unilateral disease.
Losito et al. [11]2005195– ARAS >50%54 (mean)136—PTRA/PTRAS
54—medical treatment
Change in renal function and BP from baseline and survivalPTRA—slightly lower increase in creatinine over time (P = 0.041) and better BP control (P < 0.05).
ESKD:
– 13/136 (9.5%)—PTRA/PTRAS; 7/54 (13%)—medical treatment
Intervention had no effect on survival or incidence of ESKD. Baseline creatinine, rather than degree of RAS, was a predictor of reaching ESKD.
Jaff et al. [22] (HERCULES)2012202
  • – RAS ≥60% or suboptimal PTRA result with significant residual stenosis

  • – Uncontrolled BP >140/90 mmHg despite Rx

9PTRAS (Herculink Elite stent)9-Month binary restenosis rate as determined by duplex ultrasound and/or angiographyRestenosis at 9 months
  • – 22/209 (10.5%)

BP control at 9 months:
  • – Statistically significant drop in SBP (P < 0.0001) with no change in medication

1/202 (0.5%)—died
2/202 (1%)—atheromatous embolization and kidney injury
This cohort of patients had refractory hypertension despite the fact that 75% were taking ACEi/ARB. Revascularization optimized BP control in this selected cohort, and degree of BP reduction correlated with baseline BP. There was no correlation between BP response to revascularization and baseline BNP or BNP reduction.

ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARAS, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ARVD, atherosclerotic renovascular disease; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; BP, blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; FMD, fibromuscular dysplasia; PTRA, percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty; PTRAS, percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty and stenting; RAS, renal artery stenosis; RF, renal function; RVH, renovascular hypertension; Rx, treatment; sCr, serum creatinine.

aDefined as diastolic BP <95 or 90 mmHg with no anti-hypertensive medication.

bDefined as diastolic BP <90 mmHg.

csCr decreased by >20% from baseline.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close