Table 5

Clinical trials of repeated cell therapy in ischaemic or non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

TrialsPhaseClinical settingPlacebo controlled; randomized; double-blindFollow-upnCell type, dose, and treatment groupsDelivery methodEndpoint evaluationLVEFLV volumesScar sizeNYHA classFunctional capacityQoL
DanCell-CHF Diederichsen et al.198IIIschaemic HFNot; not; not12 months32One group: 647 ± 382 × 106 (1st dose) and 889 ± 361 × 106 (2nd dose) BM-MNCs, 4 months apart; variables compared before and after treatmentICEchoNSNSNANSNA
Yao et al.199?First STEMI with LVEF 20–39%Yes; yes; ?12 months39Three groups: single dose 1.9 ± 1.2 × 108; two doses of 2.0 ± 1.4 × 108 and 2.1 ± 1.7 × 108 BM-MNCs 3 months apart; one dose of placeboICMRI/SPECT2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose > controlNANANA
Gu et al.200IIschaemic HFNot; ?; not12 months45Control (no intervention) vs. single dose SC G-CSF and single dose (1.5–2 × 108) IV MNCs containing a minimum of 1 × 106 CD34+cells vs. single dose G-CSF and two doses of IV MNCs 6 months apartICEcho/SPECT2 doses > 1 dose > controlNALVEDV: 2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose or controlNANA
Mann et al.201 aNARefractory, no-option anginaNot; not; not12 months23One group: 1st dose 93.5 ± 20.1 × 106 BM-MNCs (with 2.0 ± 1.4% CD34+ cells); 2nd dose 98.7 ± 6.3 × 106 BM-MNCs (with 1.8 ± 1.2% CD34+ cells), 4.6 ± 2.5 years apartTOMRI/SPECTNANANANA
Assmus et al.202bNAIschaemic HFNot; not; not36 months297Two doses of 190 + 110 × 106 BM-MNCs at 3–6 months vs. one doseICSHFM scoreNANANANANANA
Vrtovec et al.74II/IIINon-ischaemic HFNo; yes; yes12 months60Two doses 6 months apart vs. single dose of 80 × 106 G-CSF-mobilized CD34+ cellsTOEchoNSNSNANANSNA
REPEAT121cII/IIIIschaemic cardiomyopathy, EF ≤45%No; yes; no5 years81Autologous BM-MNCs, one vs. two doses 4 months apartICFollow-upNANANANANANA
TrialsPhaseClinical settingPlacebo controlled; randomized; double-blindFollow-upnCell type, dose, and treatment groupsDelivery methodEndpoint evaluationLVEFLV volumesScar sizeNYHA classFunctional capacityQoL
DanCell-CHF Diederichsen et al.198IIIschaemic HFNot; not; not12 months32One group: 647 ± 382 × 106 (1st dose) and 889 ± 361 × 106 (2nd dose) BM-MNCs, 4 months apart; variables compared before and after treatmentICEchoNSNSNANSNA
Yao et al.199?First STEMI with LVEF 20–39%Yes; yes; ?12 months39Three groups: single dose 1.9 ± 1.2 × 108; two doses of 2.0 ± 1.4 × 108 and 2.1 ± 1.7 × 108 BM-MNCs 3 months apart; one dose of placeboICMRI/SPECT2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose > controlNANANA
Gu et al.200IIschaemic HFNot; ?; not12 months45Control (no intervention) vs. single dose SC G-CSF and single dose (1.5–2 × 108) IV MNCs containing a minimum of 1 × 106 CD34+cells vs. single dose G-CSF and two doses of IV MNCs 6 months apartICEcho/SPECT2 doses > 1 dose > controlNALVEDV: 2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose or controlNANA
Mann et al.201 aNARefractory, no-option anginaNot; not; not12 months23One group: 1st dose 93.5 ± 20.1 × 106 BM-MNCs (with 2.0 ± 1.4% CD34+ cells); 2nd dose 98.7 ± 6.3 × 106 BM-MNCs (with 1.8 ± 1.2% CD34+ cells), 4.6 ± 2.5 years apartTOMRI/SPECTNANANANA
Assmus et al.202bNAIschaemic HFNot; not; not36 months297Two doses of 190 + 110 × 106 BM-MNCs at 3–6 months vs. one doseICSHFM scoreNANANANANANA
Vrtovec et al.74II/IIINon-ischaemic HFNo; yes; yes12 months60Two doses 6 months apart vs. single dose of 80 × 106 G-CSF-mobilized CD34+ cellsTOEchoNSNSNANANSNA
REPEAT121cII/IIIIschaemic cardiomyopathy, EF ≤45%No; yes; no5 years81Autologous BM-MNCs, one vs. two doses 4 months apartICFollow-upNANANANANANA

Trials are listed in chronological order of publication.

indicates increase; ↓, decrease; BMMNCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; Echo, echocardiography; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; ESV, end-systolic volume; G-CSF, Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; HF, heart failure; IC, intracoronary; IV, intravenous; LV, left ventricle; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; n, number of patients; NA, not assessed; NS, not significant; NYHA, New York Heart Association; QoL, quality of life; SHFM, Seattle Heart Failure model; SPECT, single-photon emission tomography; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; TE, transendocardial.

a

Improvement in myocardial perfusion (measured by SPECT), angina, and quality of life score was noted.

b

Repeated intracoronary infusion of autologous BMMNCs was associated with significantly better 2-year survival compared with a single BMMNC infusion. At the 3-year follow-up, the trend persisted but the mortality reduction was no longer statistically significant between single and repeated treatment. Additionally, mortality was significantly lower at the 2-year follow-up compared with the mortality estimated using the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) in patients receiving repeated BMMNC infusions.

c

Study will be completed in 2022. Primary endpoint: mortality at 2 years; secondary endpoint: Morbidity [cardiac and cardiovascular mortality, HF hospitalization, ischaemic cardiac events, coronary revascularization, cardiac transplantation, assisted device implantation, new synchronization therapy, ICD implantation, NYHA status, MLHFQ, bleeding events, all in-hospital events (during hospitalization for BMC therapy), life-threatening arrhythmias, new malignancies].

Table 5

Clinical trials of repeated cell therapy in ischaemic or non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

TrialsPhaseClinical settingPlacebo controlled; randomized; double-blindFollow-upnCell type, dose, and treatment groupsDelivery methodEndpoint evaluationLVEFLV volumesScar sizeNYHA classFunctional capacityQoL
DanCell-CHF Diederichsen et al.198IIIschaemic HFNot; not; not12 months32One group: 647 ± 382 × 106 (1st dose) and 889 ± 361 × 106 (2nd dose) BM-MNCs, 4 months apart; variables compared before and after treatmentICEchoNSNSNANSNA
Yao et al.199?First STEMI with LVEF 20–39%Yes; yes; ?12 months39Three groups: single dose 1.9 ± 1.2 × 108; two doses of 2.0 ± 1.4 × 108 and 2.1 ± 1.7 × 108 BM-MNCs 3 months apart; one dose of placeboICMRI/SPECT2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose > controlNANANA
Gu et al.200IIschaemic HFNot; ?; not12 months45Control (no intervention) vs. single dose SC G-CSF and single dose (1.5–2 × 108) IV MNCs containing a minimum of 1 × 106 CD34+cells vs. single dose G-CSF and two doses of IV MNCs 6 months apartICEcho/SPECT2 doses > 1 dose > controlNALVEDV: 2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose or controlNANA
Mann et al.201 aNARefractory, no-option anginaNot; not; not12 months23One group: 1st dose 93.5 ± 20.1 × 106 BM-MNCs (with 2.0 ± 1.4% CD34+ cells); 2nd dose 98.7 ± 6.3 × 106 BM-MNCs (with 1.8 ± 1.2% CD34+ cells), 4.6 ± 2.5 years apartTOMRI/SPECTNANANANA
Assmus et al.202bNAIschaemic HFNot; not; not36 months297Two doses of 190 + 110 × 106 BM-MNCs at 3–6 months vs. one doseICSHFM scoreNANANANANANA
Vrtovec et al.74II/IIINon-ischaemic HFNo; yes; yes12 months60Two doses 6 months apart vs. single dose of 80 × 106 G-CSF-mobilized CD34+ cellsTOEchoNSNSNANANSNA
REPEAT121cII/IIIIschaemic cardiomyopathy, EF ≤45%No; yes; no5 years81Autologous BM-MNCs, one vs. two doses 4 months apartICFollow-upNANANANANANA
TrialsPhaseClinical settingPlacebo controlled; randomized; double-blindFollow-upnCell type, dose, and treatment groupsDelivery methodEndpoint evaluationLVEFLV volumesScar sizeNYHA classFunctional capacityQoL
DanCell-CHF Diederichsen et al.198IIIschaemic HFNot; not; not12 months32One group: 647 ± 382 × 106 (1st dose) and 889 ± 361 × 106 (2nd dose) BM-MNCs, 4 months apart; variables compared before and after treatmentICEchoNSNSNANSNA
Yao et al.199?First STEMI with LVEF 20–39%Yes; yes; ?12 months39Three groups: single dose 1.9 ± 1.2 × 108; two doses of 2.0 ± 1.4 × 108 and 2.1 ± 1.7 × 108 BM-MNCs 3 months apart; one dose of placeboICMRI/SPECT2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose > controlNANANA
Gu et al.200IIschaemic HFNot; ?; not12 months45Control (no intervention) vs. single dose SC G-CSF and single dose (1.5–2 × 108) IV MNCs containing a minimum of 1 × 106 CD34+cells vs. single dose G-CSF and two doses of IV MNCs 6 months apartICEcho/SPECT2 doses > 1 dose > controlNALVEDV: 2 doses > 1 dose > control2 doses > 1 dose or controlNANA
Mann et al.201 aNARefractory, no-option anginaNot; not; not12 months23One group: 1st dose 93.5 ± 20.1 × 106 BM-MNCs (with 2.0 ± 1.4% CD34+ cells); 2nd dose 98.7 ± 6.3 × 106 BM-MNCs (with 1.8 ± 1.2% CD34+ cells), 4.6 ± 2.5 years apartTOMRI/SPECTNANANANA
Assmus et al.202bNAIschaemic HFNot; not; not36 months297Two doses of 190 + 110 × 106 BM-MNCs at 3–6 months vs. one doseICSHFM scoreNANANANANANA
Vrtovec et al.74II/IIINon-ischaemic HFNo; yes; yes12 months60Two doses 6 months apart vs. single dose of 80 × 106 G-CSF-mobilized CD34+ cellsTOEchoNSNSNANANSNA
REPEAT121cII/IIIIschaemic cardiomyopathy, EF ≤45%No; yes; no5 years81Autologous BM-MNCs, one vs. two doses 4 months apartICFollow-upNANANANANANA

Trials are listed in chronological order of publication.

indicates increase; ↓, decrease; BMMNCs, bone marrow mononuclear cells; Echo, echocardiography; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; ESV, end-systolic volume; G-CSF, Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; HF, heart failure; IC, intracoronary; IV, intravenous; LV, left ventricle; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; n, number of patients; NA, not assessed; NS, not significant; NYHA, New York Heart Association; QoL, quality of life; SHFM, Seattle Heart Failure model; SPECT, single-photon emission tomography; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; TE, transendocardial.

a

Improvement in myocardial perfusion (measured by SPECT), angina, and quality of life score was noted.

b

Repeated intracoronary infusion of autologous BMMNCs was associated with significantly better 2-year survival compared with a single BMMNC infusion. At the 3-year follow-up, the trend persisted but the mortality reduction was no longer statistically significant between single and repeated treatment. Additionally, mortality was significantly lower at the 2-year follow-up compared with the mortality estimated using the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) in patients receiving repeated BMMNC infusions.

c

Study will be completed in 2022. Primary endpoint: mortality at 2 years; secondary endpoint: Morbidity [cardiac and cardiovascular mortality, HF hospitalization, ischaemic cardiac events, coronary revascularization, cardiac transplantation, assisted device implantation, new synchronization therapy, ICD implantation, NYHA status, MLHFQ, bleeding events, all in-hospital events (during hospitalization for BMC therapy), life-threatening arrhythmias, new malignancies].

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close