Table 4.

Model selection for the GRB sample. |$\mathcal {Z}$| represents the Bayesian evidence. Reported uncertainties represent 1–σ. We select the mode, either homogeneous (ISM) or wind-like environment, with higher inferred evidence values. The evidence values for the preferred model are written in bold numerals.

Burst name|$\ln \mathcal {Z}$| [ISM]|$\ln \mathcal {Z}$| [Wind]Bayes factor
short GRBs051221A|$\mathbf {-22.79 \pm 0.04}$|−24.26 ± 0.124.33
130603B(a)−21.45 ± 0.05−21.42 ± 0.03∼1.
140903A|$\mathbf {-24.97 \pm 0.05}$|−25.73 ± 0.022.15
200522A|$\mathbf {-18.31 \pm 0.03}$|−19.30 ± 0.022.68
long GRBs970508−99.21 ± 0.12|$\mathbf {-92.68 \pm 0.31}$|>150
980703−86.74 ± 0.02|$\mathbf {-82.33 \pm 0.06}$|82.80
990510|$\mathbf {279.21 \pm 0.02}$|278.45 ± 0.032.15
991208|$\mathbf {-60.33 \pm 0.04}$|−67.63 ± 0.10>150
991216−5.37 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-4.56 \pm 0.03}$|2.25
000301C|$\mathbf {37.45 \pm 0.05}$|25.30 ± 0.12>150
000418−55.09 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-49.81 \pm 0.05}$|>150
00092628.31 ± 0.08|$\mathbf {34.48 \pm 0.04}$|>150
010222|$\mathbf {37.34 \pm 0.04}$|31.01 ± 0.02>150
030329|$\mathbf {-29.23 \pm 0.01}$|−59.81 ± 0.05>150
050820A−40.26 ± 0.74|$\mathbf {-33.88 \pm 0.05}$|>150
050904|$\mathbf {-31.20 \pm 0.03}$|−33.30 ± 0.078.13
060418|$\mathbf {-11.55 \pm 0.06}$|−19.19 ± 0.02>150
090328|$\mathbf {-50.14 \pm 0.03}$|−51.69 ± 0.304.71
090423|$\mathbf {-51.42 \pm 0.06}$|−55.97 ± 0.1094.59
090902B−49.39 ± 0.02|$\mathbf {-39.78 \pm 0.04}$|>150
090926A|$\mathbf {-9.68 \pm 0.03}$|−12.24 ± 0.0212.98
120521C|$\mathbf {-54.96 \pm 0.06}$|−55.50 ± 0.091.70
130427A324.52 ± 0.08|$\mathbf {336.86 \pm 0.03}$|>150
130702A|$\mathbf {19.45 \pm 0.18}$|8.55 ± 0.68>150
130907A|$\mathbf {-135.85 \pm 0.01}$|−141.59 ± 0.02>150
140304A−60.46 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-57.90 \pm 0.04}$|13.00
Burst name|$\ln \mathcal {Z}$| [ISM]|$\ln \mathcal {Z}$| [Wind]Bayes factor
short GRBs051221A|$\mathbf {-22.79 \pm 0.04}$|−24.26 ± 0.124.33
130603B(a)−21.45 ± 0.05−21.42 ± 0.03∼1.
140903A|$\mathbf {-24.97 \pm 0.05}$|−25.73 ± 0.022.15
200522A|$\mathbf {-18.31 \pm 0.03}$|−19.30 ± 0.022.68
long GRBs970508−99.21 ± 0.12|$\mathbf {-92.68 \pm 0.31}$|>150
980703−86.74 ± 0.02|$\mathbf {-82.33 \pm 0.06}$|82.80
990510|$\mathbf {279.21 \pm 0.02}$|278.45 ± 0.032.15
991208|$\mathbf {-60.33 \pm 0.04}$|−67.63 ± 0.10>150
991216−5.37 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-4.56 \pm 0.03}$|2.25
000301C|$\mathbf {37.45 \pm 0.05}$|25.30 ± 0.12>150
000418−55.09 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-49.81 \pm 0.05}$|>150
00092628.31 ± 0.08|$\mathbf {34.48 \pm 0.04}$|>150
010222|$\mathbf {37.34 \pm 0.04}$|31.01 ± 0.02>150
030329|$\mathbf {-29.23 \pm 0.01}$|−59.81 ± 0.05>150
050820A−40.26 ± 0.74|$\mathbf {-33.88 \pm 0.05}$|>150
050904|$\mathbf {-31.20 \pm 0.03}$|−33.30 ± 0.078.13
060418|$\mathbf {-11.55 \pm 0.06}$|−19.19 ± 0.02>150
090328|$\mathbf {-50.14 \pm 0.03}$|−51.69 ± 0.304.71
090423|$\mathbf {-51.42 \pm 0.06}$|−55.97 ± 0.1094.59
090902B−49.39 ± 0.02|$\mathbf {-39.78 \pm 0.04}$|>150
090926A|$\mathbf {-9.68 \pm 0.03}$|−12.24 ± 0.0212.98
120521C|$\mathbf {-54.96 \pm 0.06}$|−55.50 ± 0.091.70
130427A324.52 ± 0.08|$\mathbf {336.86 \pm 0.03}$|>150
130702A|$\mathbf {19.45 \pm 0.18}$|8.55 ± 0.68>150
130907A|$\mathbf {-135.85 \pm 0.01}$|−141.59 ± 0.02>150
140304A−60.46 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-57.90 \pm 0.04}$|13.00

aFor this data set, both homogeneous and wind-like models result in similar evidence values. An ISM-type environment is preferred since this is a short GRB and no strong winds are expected due their progenitors.

Table 4.

Model selection for the GRB sample. |$\mathcal {Z}$| represents the Bayesian evidence. Reported uncertainties represent 1–σ. We select the mode, either homogeneous (ISM) or wind-like environment, with higher inferred evidence values. The evidence values for the preferred model are written in bold numerals.

Burst name|$\ln \mathcal {Z}$| [ISM]|$\ln \mathcal {Z}$| [Wind]Bayes factor
short GRBs051221A|$\mathbf {-22.79 \pm 0.04}$|−24.26 ± 0.124.33
130603B(a)−21.45 ± 0.05−21.42 ± 0.03∼1.
140903A|$\mathbf {-24.97 \pm 0.05}$|−25.73 ± 0.022.15
200522A|$\mathbf {-18.31 \pm 0.03}$|−19.30 ± 0.022.68
long GRBs970508−99.21 ± 0.12|$\mathbf {-92.68 \pm 0.31}$|>150
980703−86.74 ± 0.02|$\mathbf {-82.33 \pm 0.06}$|82.80
990510|$\mathbf {279.21 \pm 0.02}$|278.45 ± 0.032.15
991208|$\mathbf {-60.33 \pm 0.04}$|−67.63 ± 0.10>150
991216−5.37 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-4.56 \pm 0.03}$|2.25
000301C|$\mathbf {37.45 \pm 0.05}$|25.30 ± 0.12>150
000418−55.09 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-49.81 \pm 0.05}$|>150
00092628.31 ± 0.08|$\mathbf {34.48 \pm 0.04}$|>150
010222|$\mathbf {37.34 \pm 0.04}$|31.01 ± 0.02>150
030329|$\mathbf {-29.23 \pm 0.01}$|−59.81 ± 0.05>150
050820A−40.26 ± 0.74|$\mathbf {-33.88 \pm 0.05}$|>150
050904|$\mathbf {-31.20 \pm 0.03}$|−33.30 ± 0.078.13
060418|$\mathbf {-11.55 \pm 0.06}$|−19.19 ± 0.02>150
090328|$\mathbf {-50.14 \pm 0.03}$|−51.69 ± 0.304.71
090423|$\mathbf {-51.42 \pm 0.06}$|−55.97 ± 0.1094.59
090902B−49.39 ± 0.02|$\mathbf {-39.78 \pm 0.04}$|>150
090926A|$\mathbf {-9.68 \pm 0.03}$|−12.24 ± 0.0212.98
120521C|$\mathbf {-54.96 \pm 0.06}$|−55.50 ± 0.091.70
130427A324.52 ± 0.08|$\mathbf {336.86 \pm 0.03}$|>150
130702A|$\mathbf {19.45 \pm 0.18}$|8.55 ± 0.68>150
130907A|$\mathbf {-135.85 \pm 0.01}$|−141.59 ± 0.02>150
140304A−60.46 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-57.90 \pm 0.04}$|13.00
Burst name|$\ln \mathcal {Z}$| [ISM]|$\ln \mathcal {Z}$| [Wind]Bayes factor
short GRBs051221A|$\mathbf {-22.79 \pm 0.04}$|−24.26 ± 0.124.33
130603B(a)−21.45 ± 0.05−21.42 ± 0.03∼1.
140903A|$\mathbf {-24.97 \pm 0.05}$|−25.73 ± 0.022.15
200522A|$\mathbf {-18.31 \pm 0.03}$|−19.30 ± 0.022.68
long GRBs970508−99.21 ± 0.12|$\mathbf {-92.68 \pm 0.31}$|>150
980703−86.74 ± 0.02|$\mathbf {-82.33 \pm 0.06}$|82.80
990510|$\mathbf {279.21 \pm 0.02}$|278.45 ± 0.032.15
991208|$\mathbf {-60.33 \pm 0.04}$|−67.63 ± 0.10>150
991216−5.37 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-4.56 \pm 0.03}$|2.25
000301C|$\mathbf {37.45 \pm 0.05}$|25.30 ± 0.12>150
000418−55.09 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-49.81 \pm 0.05}$|>150
00092628.31 ± 0.08|$\mathbf {34.48 \pm 0.04}$|>150
010222|$\mathbf {37.34 \pm 0.04}$|31.01 ± 0.02>150
030329|$\mathbf {-29.23 \pm 0.01}$|−59.81 ± 0.05>150
050820A−40.26 ± 0.74|$\mathbf {-33.88 \pm 0.05}$|>150
050904|$\mathbf {-31.20 \pm 0.03}$|−33.30 ± 0.078.13
060418|$\mathbf {-11.55 \pm 0.06}$|−19.19 ± 0.02>150
090328|$\mathbf {-50.14 \pm 0.03}$|−51.69 ± 0.304.71
090423|$\mathbf {-51.42 \pm 0.06}$|−55.97 ± 0.1094.59
090902B−49.39 ± 0.02|$\mathbf {-39.78 \pm 0.04}$|>150
090926A|$\mathbf {-9.68 \pm 0.03}$|−12.24 ± 0.0212.98
120521C|$\mathbf {-54.96 \pm 0.06}$|−55.50 ± 0.091.70
130427A324.52 ± 0.08|$\mathbf {336.86 \pm 0.03}$|>150
130702A|$\mathbf {19.45 \pm 0.18}$|8.55 ± 0.68>150
130907A|$\mathbf {-135.85 \pm 0.01}$|−141.59 ± 0.02>150
140304A−60.46 ± 0.04|$\mathbf {-57.90 \pm 0.04}$|13.00

aFor this data set, both homogeneous and wind-like models result in similar evidence values. An ISM-type environment is preferred since this is a short GRB and no strong winds are expected due their progenitors.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close