Table 3.

Accuracy of different predictions schemes for the non-linear matter power spectrum compared to the node cosmologies of franken emu and mira titan. The number of fitted parameters is given, along with the additional number of fitted parameters for massive-neutrino models. The first number in the accuracy columns show the RMS residual of the model with respect to the emulator averaged logarithmically over k (between 0.01 and |$10\, h\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$| for franken emu and between 0.01 and |$7\, h\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$| for Mira Titan) and over z = 0, 0.5, 1, and 2. The second number in the accuracy column shown the maximum error over the same range over all node cosmologies.

Prediction schemeReference# Fitted parametersfranken emu error [per cent]mira titan error [per cent]
RMSMaxRMSMax
hmcode-2020This paper121.710.62.515.9
hmcodeMead et al. (2016)12 (+2)2.312.94.222.9
hmcodeMead et al. (2015)122.212.5
halofitTakahashi et al. (2012), Bird et al. (2012)34 (+6)3.616.55.024.7
halofitSmith et al. (2003)309.543.5
Prediction schemeReference# Fitted parametersfranken emu error [per cent]mira titan error [per cent]
RMSMaxRMSMax
hmcode-2020This paper121.710.62.515.9
hmcodeMead et al. (2016)12 (+2)2.312.94.222.9
hmcodeMead et al. (2015)122.212.5
halofitTakahashi et al. (2012), Bird et al. (2012)34 (+6)3.616.55.024.7
halofitSmith et al. (2003)309.543.5
Table 3.

Accuracy of different predictions schemes for the non-linear matter power spectrum compared to the node cosmologies of franken emu and mira titan. The number of fitted parameters is given, along with the additional number of fitted parameters for massive-neutrino models. The first number in the accuracy columns show the RMS residual of the model with respect to the emulator averaged logarithmically over k (between 0.01 and |$10\, h\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$| for franken emu and between 0.01 and |$7\, h\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$| for Mira Titan) and over z = 0, 0.5, 1, and 2. The second number in the accuracy column shown the maximum error over the same range over all node cosmologies.

Prediction schemeReference# Fitted parametersfranken emu error [per cent]mira titan error [per cent]
RMSMaxRMSMax
hmcode-2020This paper121.710.62.515.9
hmcodeMead et al. (2016)12 (+2)2.312.94.222.9
hmcodeMead et al. (2015)122.212.5
halofitTakahashi et al. (2012), Bird et al. (2012)34 (+6)3.616.55.024.7
halofitSmith et al. (2003)309.543.5
Prediction schemeReference# Fitted parametersfranken emu error [per cent]mira titan error [per cent]
RMSMaxRMSMax
hmcode-2020This paper121.710.62.515.9
hmcodeMead et al. (2016)12 (+2)2.312.94.222.9
hmcodeMead et al. (2015)122.212.5
halofitTakahashi et al. (2012), Bird et al. (2012)34 (+6)3.616.55.024.7
halofitSmith et al. (2003)309.543.5
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close