Accuracy of different predictions schemes for the non-linear matter power spectrum compared to the node cosmologies of franken emu and mira titan. The number of fitted parameters is given, along with the additional number of fitted parameters for massive-neutrino models. The first number in the accuracy columns show the RMS residual of the model with respect to the emulator averaged logarithmically over k (between 0.01 and |$10\, h\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$| for franken emu and between 0.01 and |$7\, h\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$| for Mira Titan) and over z = 0, 0.5, 1, and 2. The second number in the accuracy column shown the maximum error over the same range over all node cosmologies.
Prediction scheme . | Reference . | # Fitted parameters . | franken emu error [per cent] . | mira titan error [per cent] . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | RMS . | Max . | RMS . | Max . |
hmcode-2020 | This paper | 12 | 1.7 | 10.6 | 2.5 | 15.9 |
hmcode | Mead et al. (2016) | 12 (+2) | 2.3 | 12.9 | 4.2 | 22.9 |
hmcode | Mead et al. (2015) | 12 | 2.2 | 12.5 | – | |
halofit | Takahashi et al. (2012), Bird et al. (2012) | 34 (+6) | 3.6 | 16.5 | 5.0 | 24.7 |
halofit | Smith et al. (2003) | 30 | 9.5 | 43.5 | – |
Prediction scheme . | Reference . | # Fitted parameters . | franken emu error [per cent] . | mira titan error [per cent] . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | RMS . | Max . | RMS . | Max . |
hmcode-2020 | This paper | 12 | 1.7 | 10.6 | 2.5 | 15.9 |
hmcode | Mead et al. (2016) | 12 (+2) | 2.3 | 12.9 | 4.2 | 22.9 |
hmcode | Mead et al. (2015) | 12 | 2.2 | 12.5 | – | |
halofit | Takahashi et al. (2012), Bird et al. (2012) | 34 (+6) | 3.6 | 16.5 | 5.0 | 24.7 |
halofit | Smith et al. (2003) | 30 | 9.5 | 43.5 | – |
Accuracy of different predictions schemes for the non-linear matter power spectrum compared to the node cosmologies of franken emu and mira titan. The number of fitted parameters is given, along with the additional number of fitted parameters for massive-neutrino models. The first number in the accuracy columns show the RMS residual of the model with respect to the emulator averaged logarithmically over k (between 0.01 and |$10\, h\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$| for franken emu and between 0.01 and |$7\, h\, \mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$| for Mira Titan) and over z = 0, 0.5, 1, and 2. The second number in the accuracy column shown the maximum error over the same range over all node cosmologies.
Prediction scheme . | Reference . | # Fitted parameters . | franken emu error [per cent] . | mira titan error [per cent] . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | RMS . | Max . | RMS . | Max . |
hmcode-2020 | This paper | 12 | 1.7 | 10.6 | 2.5 | 15.9 |
hmcode | Mead et al. (2016) | 12 (+2) | 2.3 | 12.9 | 4.2 | 22.9 |
hmcode | Mead et al. (2015) | 12 | 2.2 | 12.5 | – | |
halofit | Takahashi et al. (2012), Bird et al. (2012) | 34 (+6) | 3.6 | 16.5 | 5.0 | 24.7 |
halofit | Smith et al. (2003) | 30 | 9.5 | 43.5 | – |
Prediction scheme . | Reference . | # Fitted parameters . | franken emu error [per cent] . | mira titan error [per cent] . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | RMS . | Max . | RMS . | Max . |
hmcode-2020 | This paper | 12 | 1.7 | 10.6 | 2.5 | 15.9 |
hmcode | Mead et al. (2016) | 12 (+2) | 2.3 | 12.9 | 4.2 | 22.9 |
hmcode | Mead et al. (2015) | 12 | 2.2 | 12.5 | – | |
halofit | Takahashi et al. (2012), Bird et al. (2012) | 34 (+6) | 3.6 | 16.5 | 5.0 | 24.7 |
halofit | Smith et al. (2003) | 30 | 9.5 | 43.5 | – |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.