Summary Statistics of ND4 Sequence Variation in 8 Culex tarsalis Populations from the Western United States
Population | Location | N | H | S | Hd | π | K | D | r | Fs | S | D* | F* |
CTC | Coachella, CA | 29 | 15 | 18 | 0.852 | 0.0066 | 2.32 | −1.81* | 0.041 | −9.07** | 1.00** | −2.25 | −2.48 |
CTM | Los Angeles, CA | 26 | 16 | 17 | 0.948 | 0.0079 | 2.76 | −1.79 | 0.067 | −10.19** | 1.00** | −2.06 | −2.32 |
CTK | Kern, CA | 23 | 11 | 15 | 0.775 | 0.0066 | 2.29 | −1.56 | 0.049 | −4.60** | 0.997** | −1.71 | −1.94 |
CTG | Yolo, CA | 30 | 17 | 18 | 0.913 | 0.0063 | 2.21 | −1.77 | 0.047 | −12.85** | 1.00** | −2.82* | −2.92* |
CTY | Yuba, CA | 16 | 9 | 9 | 0.858 | 0.0061 | 2.14 | −0.77 | 0.047 | −3.89* | 0.995* | −1.01 | −1.09 |
CTWa | Benton, WA | 16 | 12 | 13 | 0.926 | 0.0069 | 2.40 | −1.43 | 0.052 | −9.94** | 1.00** | −1.05 | −1.34 |
CTOa | Gunnison, CO | 16 | 10 | 10 | 0.867 | 0.0050 | 1.74 | −1.57 | 0.070 | −6.50** | 1.00** | −1.67 | −1.89 |
CTNa | Adams, NE | 14 | 12 | 14 | 0.962 | 0.0076 | 2.64 | −1.72 | 0.051 | −7.87** | 1.00** | −2.17 | −2.35 |
Overall | 170 | 64 | 49 | 0.887 | 0.0068 | 2.36 | −2.29** | 0.034 | −92.82** | 1.00** | −4.67* | −4.37* |
Population | Location | N | H | S | Hd | π | K | D | r | Fs | S | D* | F* |
CTC | Coachella, CA | 29 | 15 | 18 | 0.852 | 0.0066 | 2.32 | −1.81* | 0.041 | −9.07** | 1.00** | −2.25 | −2.48 |
CTM | Los Angeles, CA | 26 | 16 | 17 | 0.948 | 0.0079 | 2.76 | −1.79 | 0.067 | −10.19** | 1.00** | −2.06 | −2.32 |
CTK | Kern, CA | 23 | 11 | 15 | 0.775 | 0.0066 | 2.29 | −1.56 | 0.049 | −4.60** | 0.997** | −1.71 | −1.94 |
CTG | Yolo, CA | 30 | 17 | 18 | 0.913 | 0.0063 | 2.21 | −1.77 | 0.047 | −12.85** | 1.00** | −2.82* | −2.92* |
CTY | Yuba, CA | 16 | 9 | 9 | 0.858 | 0.0061 | 2.14 | −0.77 | 0.047 | −3.89* | 0.995* | −1.01 | −1.09 |
CTWa | Benton, WA | 16 | 12 | 13 | 0.926 | 0.0069 | 2.40 | −1.43 | 0.052 | −9.94** | 1.00** | −1.05 | −1.34 |
CTOa | Gunnison, CO | 16 | 10 | 10 | 0.867 | 0.0050 | 1.74 | −1.57 | 0.070 | −6.50** | 1.00** | −1.67 | −1.89 |
CTNa | Adams, NE | 14 | 12 | 14 | 0.962 | 0.0076 | 2.64 | −1.72 | 0.051 | −7.87** | 1.00** | −2.17 | −2.35 |
Overall | 170 | 64 | 49 | 0.887 | 0.0068 | 2.36 | −2.29** | 0.034 | −92.82** | 1.00** | −4.67* | −4.37* |
NOTE.—N, number of sequences analyzed; H, number of haplotypes; S, number of segregating sites; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; K, average number of nucleotide differences; D, Tajima's statistic (Tajima 1989); r, raggedness statistic (Harpending 1994); FS, Fu's statistic (Fu 1997); S, Strobeck's statistic (Strobeck 1987); D* and F*, Fu and Li's statistics (Fu and Li 1993).
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01. Significance was determined using coalescent simulations in DnaSP v. 4.0.
Summary Statistics of ND4 Sequence Variation in 8 Culex tarsalis Populations from the Western United States
Population | Location | N | H | S | Hd | π | K | D | r | Fs | S | D* | F* |
CTC | Coachella, CA | 29 | 15 | 18 | 0.852 | 0.0066 | 2.32 | −1.81* | 0.041 | −9.07** | 1.00** | −2.25 | −2.48 |
CTM | Los Angeles, CA | 26 | 16 | 17 | 0.948 | 0.0079 | 2.76 | −1.79 | 0.067 | −10.19** | 1.00** | −2.06 | −2.32 |
CTK | Kern, CA | 23 | 11 | 15 | 0.775 | 0.0066 | 2.29 | −1.56 | 0.049 | −4.60** | 0.997** | −1.71 | −1.94 |
CTG | Yolo, CA | 30 | 17 | 18 | 0.913 | 0.0063 | 2.21 | −1.77 | 0.047 | −12.85** | 1.00** | −2.82* | −2.92* |
CTY | Yuba, CA | 16 | 9 | 9 | 0.858 | 0.0061 | 2.14 | −0.77 | 0.047 | −3.89* | 0.995* | −1.01 | −1.09 |
CTWa | Benton, WA | 16 | 12 | 13 | 0.926 | 0.0069 | 2.40 | −1.43 | 0.052 | −9.94** | 1.00** | −1.05 | −1.34 |
CTOa | Gunnison, CO | 16 | 10 | 10 | 0.867 | 0.0050 | 1.74 | −1.57 | 0.070 | −6.50** | 1.00** | −1.67 | −1.89 |
CTNa | Adams, NE | 14 | 12 | 14 | 0.962 | 0.0076 | 2.64 | −1.72 | 0.051 | −7.87** | 1.00** | −2.17 | −2.35 |
Overall | 170 | 64 | 49 | 0.887 | 0.0068 | 2.36 | −2.29** | 0.034 | −92.82** | 1.00** | −4.67* | −4.37* |
Population | Location | N | H | S | Hd | π | K | D | r | Fs | S | D* | F* |
CTC | Coachella, CA | 29 | 15 | 18 | 0.852 | 0.0066 | 2.32 | −1.81* | 0.041 | −9.07** | 1.00** | −2.25 | −2.48 |
CTM | Los Angeles, CA | 26 | 16 | 17 | 0.948 | 0.0079 | 2.76 | −1.79 | 0.067 | −10.19** | 1.00** | −2.06 | −2.32 |
CTK | Kern, CA | 23 | 11 | 15 | 0.775 | 0.0066 | 2.29 | −1.56 | 0.049 | −4.60** | 0.997** | −1.71 | −1.94 |
CTG | Yolo, CA | 30 | 17 | 18 | 0.913 | 0.0063 | 2.21 | −1.77 | 0.047 | −12.85** | 1.00** | −2.82* | −2.92* |
CTY | Yuba, CA | 16 | 9 | 9 | 0.858 | 0.0061 | 2.14 | −0.77 | 0.047 | −3.89* | 0.995* | −1.01 | −1.09 |
CTWa | Benton, WA | 16 | 12 | 13 | 0.926 | 0.0069 | 2.40 | −1.43 | 0.052 | −9.94** | 1.00** | −1.05 | −1.34 |
CTOa | Gunnison, CO | 16 | 10 | 10 | 0.867 | 0.0050 | 1.74 | −1.57 | 0.070 | −6.50** | 1.00** | −1.67 | −1.89 |
CTNa | Adams, NE | 14 | 12 | 14 | 0.962 | 0.0076 | 2.64 | −1.72 | 0.051 | −7.87** | 1.00** | −2.17 | −2.35 |
Overall | 170 | 64 | 49 | 0.887 | 0.0068 | 2.36 | −2.29** | 0.034 | −92.82** | 1.00** | −4.67* | −4.37* |
NOTE.—N, number of sequences analyzed; H, number of haplotypes; S, number of segregating sites; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; K, average number of nucleotide differences; D, Tajima's statistic (Tajima 1989); r, raggedness statistic (Harpending 1994); FS, Fu's statistic (Fu 1997); S, Strobeck's statistic (Strobeck 1987); D* and F*, Fu and Li's statistics (Fu and Li 1993).
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01. Significance was determined using coalescent simulations in DnaSP v. 4.0.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.