Table 1. Open in new tab Data from...

Table 1.

Data from Hayden et al [9] Used for Model Calibration

Value (symbol)	Data
Admission CRE positivity fraction (a)	0.206
Cross-sectional facility CRE positivity fraction (f)	0.458
CRE clinical detection rate per 1000 patient days (d)	3.7
CRE BSI onset rate per 1000 patient days (b)	0.9
Inpatient mortality rate per admission (m)	0.215
Days of stay: mean; 25^th, 50^th, 75^th percentiles $(μ; l_{25}, l_{50}, l_{75})$	33.8; 16, 28, 43

Value (symbol)	Data
Admission CRE positivity fraction (a)	0.206
Cross-sectional facility CRE positivity fraction (f)	0.458
CRE clinical detection rate per 1000 patient days (d)	3.7
CRE BSI onset rate per 1000 patient days (b)	0.9
Inpatient mortality rate per admission (m)	0.215
Days of stay: mean; 25^th, 50^th, 75^th percentiles $(μ; l_{25}, l_{50}, l_{75})$	33.8; 16, 28, 43

When calibrating our model to the positivity fraction data, we assumed the test sensitivity $σ$ was 0.85, such that the actual CRE importation rate from admissions was $a / σ$ and the cross-sectional prevalence of CRE carriers was $f / σ$ ⁠.

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only