In this table, we summarize the characteristics and validity ranges of the different estimates for the GW-induced merger time-scales. We use the corrected time-scale TRQ as a benchmark from which to say whether the time-scales |$T_{\dot{p}=0}$|, TP, and TR over or underestimate the result.
Name . | Validity . | Time-scale accuracy . | PN effects . |
---|---|---|---|
TP | Low e0 | Underestimates | No |
|$T_{\dot{p}=0}$| | High e0 | Over/under | No |
TR | Any e0 | Underestimates | No |
TRQ | Any e0 | Best | Yes |
Name . | Validity . | Time-scale accuracy . | PN effects . |
---|---|---|---|
TP | Low e0 | Underestimates | No |
|$T_{\dot{p}=0}$| | High e0 | Over/under | No |
TR | Any e0 | Underestimates | No |
TRQ | Any e0 | Best | Yes |
In this table, we summarize the characteristics and validity ranges of the different estimates for the GW-induced merger time-scales. We use the corrected time-scale TRQ as a benchmark from which to say whether the time-scales |$T_{\dot{p}=0}$|, TP, and TR over or underestimate the result.
Name . | Validity . | Time-scale accuracy . | PN effects . |
---|---|---|---|
TP | Low e0 | Underestimates | No |
|$T_{\dot{p}=0}$| | High e0 | Over/under | No |
TR | Any e0 | Underestimates | No |
TRQ | Any e0 | Best | Yes |
Name . | Validity . | Time-scale accuracy . | PN effects . |
---|---|---|---|
TP | Low e0 | Underestimates | No |
|$T_{\dot{p}=0}$| | High e0 | Over/under | No |
TR | Any e0 | Underestimates | No |
TRQ | Any e0 | Best | Yes |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.