Table 2:

Generalized linear mixed-effect models (GLMMs) results for biomass production as a function of elevation, warming and nitrogen addition

ModelkLLAICcΔAICcwAICcRm2
E5−386.050783.0090.0000.84313.64%
13−390.654787.6604.6510.0820.00%
N4−390.088788.7735.7640.0472.02%
W4−390.644789.8856.8760.0270.04%
ModelkLLAICcΔAICcwAICcRm2
E5−386.050783.0090.0000.84313.64%
13−390.654787.6604.6510.0820.00%
N4−390.088788.7735.7640.0472.02%
W4−390.644789.8856.8760.0270.04%

Notes: Fixed effects are elevation (E: 2700, 3200 and 3400 m), experimental warming (W: Control and Warming), nitrogen addition (N: Control and Nitrogen addition) and their interactions. Random effects are experimental blocks. Shown are maximum log-likelihood (LL), the estimated number of model parameters (k), the information-theoretic Akaike’s information criterion corrected for small samples (AICc), the change in AICc relative to the top-ranked model (ΔAICc), AICc weighted (wAICc = model probability) and the marginal variance explained (Rm2) as a measure of the model’s goodness-of-fit.

Table 2:

Generalized linear mixed-effect models (GLMMs) results for biomass production as a function of elevation, warming and nitrogen addition

ModelkLLAICcΔAICcwAICcRm2
E5−386.050783.0090.0000.84313.64%
13−390.654787.6604.6510.0820.00%
N4−390.088788.7735.7640.0472.02%
W4−390.644789.8856.8760.0270.04%
ModelkLLAICcΔAICcwAICcRm2
E5−386.050783.0090.0000.84313.64%
13−390.654787.6604.6510.0820.00%
N4−390.088788.7735.7640.0472.02%
W4−390.644789.8856.8760.0270.04%

Notes: Fixed effects are elevation (E: 2700, 3200 and 3400 m), experimental warming (W: Control and Warming), nitrogen addition (N: Control and Nitrogen addition) and their interactions. Random effects are experimental blocks. Shown are maximum log-likelihood (LL), the estimated number of model parameters (k), the information-theoretic Akaike’s information criterion corrected for small samples (AICc), the change in AICc relative to the top-ranked model (ΔAICc), AICc weighted (wAICc = model probability) and the marginal variance explained (Rm2) as a measure of the model’s goodness-of-fit.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close