Table 4.

Predictive factors of Kt in the upper quartile (>69 L) with their ORs and 95% CIs

VariableOR95% CIP-value
Female versus male0.580.54–0.63<0.0001
BMI (kg/m2)
 23–25 (reference)1.0
 <18.5 versus 23–250.080.04–0.16<0.0001
 <23 versus 23–250.430.37–0.50<0.0001
 ≥25–<30 versus 23–252.492.22–2.80<0.0001
 ≥30  versus 23–2510.419.24–11.72<0.0001
Cancer versus no cancer1.151.02–1.290.0245
Vascular access at last point
AVF (reference)1.0
Other vascular access versus AVF0.580.40–0.84<0.0001
Tunnelled catheter versus AVF0.490.45–0.55<0.0001
Graft versus AVF0.720.58–0.90<0.0001
HD (reference)1.0
Acetate-free biofiltration versus HD0.710.08–6.14
Haemodiafiltration versus HD2.922.71–3.14<0.0001
Haemofiltration versus HD3.821.95–7.46<0.0001
Weekly duration of dialysis (h)4.543.99–5.17<0.0001
Emergency start versus scheduled start0.870.80–0.940.0008
eKt/V (reference)1.0
Method of measure ‘other’ versus eKt/V0.890.64–1.23
Method of measure dKt/V versus eKt/V0.570.52–0.62<0.0001
Method of measure spKt/V versus eKt/V1.431.30–1.58<0.0001
Method of measure not available versus eKt/V0.900.80–1.01
VariableOR95% CIP-value
Female versus male0.580.54–0.63<0.0001
BMI (kg/m2)
 23–25 (reference)1.0
 <18.5 versus 23–250.080.04–0.16<0.0001
 <23 versus 23–250.430.37–0.50<0.0001
 ≥25–<30 versus 23–252.492.22–2.80<0.0001
 ≥30  versus 23–2510.419.24–11.72<0.0001
Cancer versus no cancer1.151.02–1.290.0245
Vascular access at last point
AVF (reference)1.0
Other vascular access versus AVF0.580.40–0.84<0.0001
Tunnelled catheter versus AVF0.490.45–0.55<0.0001
Graft versus AVF0.720.58–0.90<0.0001
HD (reference)1.0
Acetate-free biofiltration versus HD0.710.08–6.14
Haemodiafiltration versus HD2.922.71–3.14<0.0001
Haemofiltration versus HD3.821.95–7.46<0.0001
Weekly duration of dialysis (h)4.543.99–5.17<0.0001
Emergency start versus scheduled start0.870.80–0.940.0008
eKt/V (reference)1.0
Method of measure ‘other’ versus eKt/V0.890.64–1.23
Method of measure dKt/V versus eKt/V0.570.52–0.62<0.0001
Method of measure spKt/V versus eKt/V1.431.30–1.58<0.0001
Method of measure not available versus eKt/V0.900.80–1.01

dKt/V, ionic dialysance Kt/V.

Table 4.

Predictive factors of Kt in the upper quartile (>69 L) with their ORs and 95% CIs

VariableOR95% CIP-value
Female versus male0.580.54–0.63<0.0001
BMI (kg/m2)
 23–25 (reference)1.0
 <18.5 versus 23–250.080.04–0.16<0.0001
 <23 versus 23–250.430.37–0.50<0.0001
 ≥25–<30 versus 23–252.492.22–2.80<0.0001
 ≥30  versus 23–2510.419.24–11.72<0.0001
Cancer versus no cancer1.151.02–1.290.0245
Vascular access at last point
AVF (reference)1.0
Other vascular access versus AVF0.580.40–0.84<0.0001
Tunnelled catheter versus AVF0.490.45–0.55<0.0001
Graft versus AVF0.720.58–0.90<0.0001
HD (reference)1.0
Acetate-free biofiltration versus HD0.710.08–6.14
Haemodiafiltration versus HD2.922.71–3.14<0.0001
Haemofiltration versus HD3.821.95–7.46<0.0001
Weekly duration of dialysis (h)4.543.99–5.17<0.0001
Emergency start versus scheduled start0.870.80–0.940.0008
eKt/V (reference)1.0
Method of measure ‘other’ versus eKt/V0.890.64–1.23
Method of measure dKt/V versus eKt/V0.570.52–0.62<0.0001
Method of measure spKt/V versus eKt/V1.431.30–1.58<0.0001
Method of measure not available versus eKt/V0.900.80–1.01
VariableOR95% CIP-value
Female versus male0.580.54–0.63<0.0001
BMI (kg/m2)
 23–25 (reference)1.0
 <18.5 versus 23–250.080.04–0.16<0.0001
 <23 versus 23–250.430.37–0.50<0.0001
 ≥25–<30 versus 23–252.492.22–2.80<0.0001
 ≥30  versus 23–2510.419.24–11.72<0.0001
Cancer versus no cancer1.151.02–1.290.0245
Vascular access at last point
AVF (reference)1.0
Other vascular access versus AVF0.580.40–0.84<0.0001
Tunnelled catheter versus AVF0.490.45–0.55<0.0001
Graft versus AVF0.720.58–0.90<0.0001
HD (reference)1.0
Acetate-free biofiltration versus HD0.710.08–6.14
Haemodiafiltration versus HD2.922.71–3.14<0.0001
Haemofiltration versus HD3.821.95–7.46<0.0001
Weekly duration of dialysis (h)4.543.99–5.17<0.0001
Emergency start versus scheduled start0.870.80–0.940.0008
eKt/V (reference)1.0
Method of measure ‘other’ versus eKt/V0.890.64–1.23
Method of measure dKt/V versus eKt/V0.570.52–0.62<0.0001
Method of measure spKt/V versus eKt/V1.431.30–1.58<0.0001
Method of measure not available versus eKt/V0.900.80–1.01

dKt/V, ionic dialysance Kt/V.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close