Table 2.
Open in new tab

Summary of the point source inversion results for the five studied earthquakes. The centroid location for the Mw 6.1 event was chosen accordingly to the GFZ solution, whereas for the remaining events the centroid locations are those obtained by relative centroid locations.

DateTimeCentroid Lat/Lon [deg]Depth [km]MwM0 [Nm]Stri/Dip/Rake [deg]DC/CLVD/ISO
20/5/201202:0344.90 11.24 (fixed)76.11.89×1018103, 25, 8794, 1, −5
20/5/201203:0244.92 11.20 (relative)95.04.64×1016127, 31, 10294, 3, −3
20/5/201211:3844.84 11.44 (relative)75.17.94×1016123, 29, 9784, 15, 1
29/5/201207:0044.92 11.04 (relative)85.98.81×1017103, 27, 9288, 9 −3
29/5/201210:5544.84 10.90 (relative)75.42.50×101795, 26, 8482, 11, −7
DateTimeCentroid Lat/Lon [deg]Depth [km]MwM0 [Nm]Stri/Dip/Rake [deg]DC/CLVD/ISO
20/5/201202:0344.90 11.24 (fixed)76.11.89×1018103, 25, 8794, 1, −5
20/5/201203:0244.92 11.20 (relative)95.04.64×1016127, 31, 10294, 3, −3
20/5/201211:3844.84 11.44 (relative)75.17.94×1016123, 29, 9784, 15, 1
29/5/201207:0044.92 11.04 (relative)85.98.81×1017103, 27, 9288, 9 −3
29/5/201210:5544.84 10.90 (relative)75.42.50×101795, 26, 8482, 11, −7
Table 2.
Open in new tab

Summary of the point source inversion results for the five studied earthquakes. The centroid location for the Mw 6.1 event was chosen accordingly to the GFZ solution, whereas for the remaining events the centroid locations are those obtained by relative centroid locations.

DateTimeCentroid Lat/Lon [deg]Depth [km]MwM0 [Nm]Stri/Dip/Rake [deg]DC/CLVD/ISO
20/5/201202:0344.90 11.24 (fixed)76.11.89×1018103, 25, 8794, 1, −5
20/5/201203:0244.92 11.20 (relative)95.04.64×1016127, 31, 10294, 3, −3
20/5/201211:3844.84 11.44 (relative)75.17.94×1016123, 29, 9784, 15, 1
29/5/201207:0044.92 11.04 (relative)85.98.81×1017103, 27, 9288, 9 −3
29/5/201210:5544.84 10.90 (relative)75.42.50×101795, 26, 8482, 11, −7
DateTimeCentroid Lat/Lon [deg]Depth [km]MwM0 [Nm]Stri/Dip/Rake [deg]DC/CLVD/ISO
20/5/201202:0344.90 11.24 (fixed)76.11.89×1018103, 25, 8794, 1, −5
20/5/201203:0244.92 11.20 (relative)95.04.64×1016127, 31, 10294, 3, −3
20/5/201211:3844.84 11.44 (relative)75.17.94×1016123, 29, 9784, 15, 1
29/5/201207:0044.92 11.04 (relative)85.98.81×1017103, 27, 9288, 9 −3
29/5/201210:5544.84 10.90 (relative)75.42.50×101795, 26, 8482, 11, −7
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close