Indirect, Direct, and Total Effects for the Hypothesized Cultivation Model in the Sample of 879 Parent–Child Dyads
Simple indirect effects, total indirect effect, direct effect, total effect . | . | Estimate . | SE . | 95% BCI . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | Lower . | Higher . |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.027 | 0.021 | −0.081 | 0.005 |
Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.007 | 0.014 | −0.050 | 0.013 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.835 | 0.224 | 0.398 | 1.277 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.801 | 0.227 | 0.363 | 1.250 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.034 | 0.027 | −0.097 | 0.010 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.192 | 0.082 | 0.061 | 0.388 |
Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.134 | 0.062 | 0.034 | 0.281 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.723 | 0.401 | −0.055 | 1.530 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 1.049 | 0.396 | 0.271 | 1.841 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.326 | 0.078 | 0.195 | 0.506 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.018 | 0.034 | −0.092 | 0.044 |
Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.087 | 0.034 | 0.032 | 0.166 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.479 | 0.208 | −0.894 | −0.082 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.410 | 0.202 | −0.814 | −0.027 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.069 | 0.032 | 0.010 | 0.136 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | −0.420 | 0.033 | −0.132 | 0.005 |
Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.069 | 0.049 | −0.001 | 0.200 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.611 | 0.385 | −0.094 | 1.412 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.639 | 0.388 | −0.069 | 1.446 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.027 | 0.067 | −0.094 | 0.169 |
Simple indirect effects, total indirect effect, direct effect, total effect . | . | Estimate . | SE . | 95% BCI . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | Lower . | Higher . |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.027 | 0.021 | −0.081 | 0.005 |
Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.007 | 0.014 | −0.050 | 0.013 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.835 | 0.224 | 0.398 | 1.277 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.801 | 0.227 | 0.363 | 1.250 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.034 | 0.027 | −0.097 | 0.010 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.192 | 0.082 | 0.061 | 0.388 |
Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.134 | 0.062 | 0.034 | 0.281 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.723 | 0.401 | −0.055 | 1.530 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 1.049 | 0.396 | 0.271 | 1.841 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.326 | 0.078 | 0.195 | 0.506 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.018 | 0.034 | −0.092 | 0.044 |
Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.087 | 0.034 | 0.032 | 0.166 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.479 | 0.208 | −0.894 | −0.082 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.410 | 0.202 | −0.814 | −0.027 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.069 | 0.032 | 0.010 | 0.136 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | −0.420 | 0.033 | −0.132 | 0.005 |
Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.069 | 0.049 | −0.001 | 0.200 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.611 | 0.385 | −0.094 | 1.412 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.639 | 0.388 | −0.069 | 1.446 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.027 | 0.067 | −0.094 | 0.169 |
Note. Values of indirect effect estimates presented in bold are significant at p < .05. Each bootstrap was based on 10,000 repetitions.
BCI Bias-corrected confidence intervals. BCI that do not include zero indicate a significant indirect effect; BMI body mass index z-score (children) and body mass index (parents); Ch Child; MVPA moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; P Parent; PA physical activity; Support social support provision (parents) and support receipt (children); T1 Time 1, the baseline; T2 Time 2, the 7- to 8-month follow-up.
Indirect, Direct, and Total Effects for the Hypothesized Cultivation Model in the Sample of 879 Parent–Child Dyads
Simple indirect effects, total indirect effect, direct effect, total effect . | . | Estimate . | SE . | 95% BCI . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | Lower . | Higher . |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.027 | 0.021 | −0.081 | 0.005 |
Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.007 | 0.014 | −0.050 | 0.013 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.835 | 0.224 | 0.398 | 1.277 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.801 | 0.227 | 0.363 | 1.250 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.034 | 0.027 | −0.097 | 0.010 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.192 | 0.082 | 0.061 | 0.388 |
Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.134 | 0.062 | 0.034 | 0.281 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.723 | 0.401 | −0.055 | 1.530 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 1.049 | 0.396 | 0.271 | 1.841 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.326 | 0.078 | 0.195 | 0.506 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.018 | 0.034 | −0.092 | 0.044 |
Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.087 | 0.034 | 0.032 | 0.166 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.479 | 0.208 | −0.894 | −0.082 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.410 | 0.202 | −0.814 | −0.027 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.069 | 0.032 | 0.010 | 0.136 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | −0.420 | 0.033 | −0.132 | 0.005 |
Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.069 | 0.049 | −0.001 | 0.200 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.611 | 0.385 | −0.094 | 1.412 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.639 | 0.388 | −0.069 | 1.446 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.027 | 0.067 | −0.094 | 0.169 |
Simple indirect effects, total indirect effect, direct effect, total effect . | . | Estimate . | SE . | 95% BCI . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | Lower . | Higher . |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.027 | 0.021 | −0.081 | 0.005 |
Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.007 | 0.014 | −0.050 | 0.013 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.835 | 0.224 | 0.398 | 1.277 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.801 | 0.227 | 0.363 | 1.250 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.034 | 0.027 | −0.097 | 0.010 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.192 | 0.082 | 0.061 | 0.388 |
Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.134 | 0.062 | 0.034 | 0.281 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.723 | 0.401 | −0.055 | 1.530 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 1.049 | 0.396 | 0.271 | 1.841 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.326 | 0.078 | 0.195 | 0.506 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.018 | 0.034 | −0.092 | 0.044 |
Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.087 | 0.034 | 0.032 | 0.166 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.479 | 0.208 | −0.894 | −0.082 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) | −0.410 | 0.202 | −0.814 | −0.027 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (P, T2) + Self-efficacy (Ch, T1) → MVPA (P, T2) | 0.069 | 0.032 | 0.010 | 0.136 |
Simple indirect effects | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | −0.420 | 0.033 | −0.132 | 0.005 |
Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.069 | 0.049 | −0.001 | 0.200 | |
Direct effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.611 | 0.385 | −0.094 | 1.412 |
Total indirect effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.639 | 0.388 | −0.069 | 1.446 |
Total effect | Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (P, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → Support (Ch, T2) → MVPA (Ch, T2) + Self-efficacy (P, T1) → MVPA (Ch, T2) | 0.027 | 0.067 | −0.094 | 0.169 |
Note. Values of indirect effect estimates presented in bold are significant at p < .05. Each bootstrap was based on 10,000 repetitions.
BCI Bias-corrected confidence intervals. BCI that do not include zero indicate a significant indirect effect; BMI body mass index z-score (children) and body mass index (parents); Ch Child; MVPA moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; P Parent; PA physical activity; Support social support provision (parents) and support receipt (children); T1 Time 1, the baseline; T2 Time 2, the 7- to 8-month follow-up.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.