Number and share of decisions without gaps that correspond to each LSI. Table 5b. Scoring without taking into account analysis under Article 101(3) (160 decisions)
Conduct group . | . | LSI . | Total No . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 . | 2 . | 3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | |||
G1 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 4 | 79 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 96 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 4.2 | 82.3 | 9.4 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
G2 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 0.0 | 83.3 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
G3 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 2 | 10 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 30 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 6.7 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 0.0 | ||
G4 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 28 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 0.0 | 7.1 | 53.6 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 14.3 |
Conduct group . | . | LSI . | Total No . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 . | 2 . | 3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | |||
G1 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 4 | 79 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 96 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 4.2 | 82.3 | 9.4 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
G2 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 0.0 | 83.3 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
G3 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 2 | 10 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 30 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 6.7 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 0.0 | ||
G4 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 28 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 0.0 | 7.1 | 53.6 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 14.3 |
Number and share of decisions without gaps that correspond to each LSI. Table 5b. Scoring without taking into account analysis under Article 101(3) (160 decisions)
Conduct group . | . | LSI . | Total No . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 . | 2 . | 3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | |||
G1 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 4 | 79 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 96 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 4.2 | 82.3 | 9.4 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
G2 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 0.0 | 83.3 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
G3 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 2 | 10 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 30 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 6.7 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 0.0 | ||
G4 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 28 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 0.0 | 7.1 | 53.6 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 14.3 |
Conduct group . | . | LSI . | Total No . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 . | 2 . | 3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | |||
G1 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 4 | 79 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 96 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 4.2 | 82.3 | 9.4 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
G2 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 0.0 | 83.3 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
G3 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 2 | 10 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 30 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 6.7 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 0.0 | ||
G4 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 28 |
Share of decisions for each LSI (%) | 0.0 | 7.1 | 53.6 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 14.3 |
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.