Appeal and annulment rates and Weighted Average Annulment Rates (WAAR) for each LSI and conduct group. Table 9a. Scoring taking into account analysis under Article 101(3) (140 decisions)
| Conduct group . | . | LSI . | Total No . | WAAR for each conduct group (%) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 . | 2 . | 3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | ||||
| G1 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 3 | 74 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 86 | 47.2 |
| Share of particular LSI in G1 (%) | 3.5 | 86.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | 3 | 63 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 72 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G1 (%) | 4.2 | 87.5 | 5.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | 75.0 | 92.6 | 20.0 | 0.0 | n/a | 33.3 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | 0 | 33 | 1 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 34 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | 0 | 52 | 25 | n/a | n/a | 0.00 | 47 | ||
| G2 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | n/a |
| Share of particular LSI in G2 (%) | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G2 (%) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | n/a | 0.0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| No of annulled decisions | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| Annulment rate | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| G3 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 2 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 42.9 |
| Share of particular LSI in G3 (%) | 8.7 | 30.4 | 47.8 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 8.7 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | n/a | 1 | 14 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G3 (%) | 7.1 | 28.6 | 50.0 | 7.1 | n/a | 7.1 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | 25.0 | 5.9 | 35.0 | 20.0 | n/a | 16.7 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 6 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | 0 | 25 | 71 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 43 | ||
| G4 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 35.3 |
| Share of particular LSI in G4 (%) | 0.0 | 7.1 | 53.6 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 14.3 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | n/a | 1 | 9 | 4 | n/a | 3 | 17 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G4 (%) | n/a | 5.9 | 52.9 | 23.5 | n/a | 17.6 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | n/a | 1.5 | 45.0 | 80.0 | n/a | 50.0 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | n/a | 0 | 3 | 2 | n/a | 1 | 6 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | n/a | 0 | 33 | 50 | n/a | 33 | 35 | ||
| Total No of decisions (shares %) corresponding to each LSI | 5 (3.6) | 86 (61.4) | 32 (22.9) | 8 (5.7) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (6.4) | 140 | ||
| Total No of appealed decisions (shares %) corresponding to each LSI | 4 (3.9) | 68 (66.0) | 20 (19.4) | 5 (4.9) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (5.8) | 103 | ||
| WAAR for each value of LSI (%) | 0.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 40.0 | n/a | 16.7 | |||
| Conduct group . | . | LSI . | Total No . | WAAR for each conduct group (%) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 . | 2 . | 3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | ||||
| G1 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 3 | 74 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 86 | 47.2 |
| Share of particular LSI in G1 (%) | 3.5 | 86.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | 3 | 63 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 72 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G1 (%) | 4.2 | 87.5 | 5.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | 75.0 | 92.6 | 20.0 | 0.0 | n/a | 33.3 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | 0 | 33 | 1 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 34 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | 0 | 52 | 25 | n/a | n/a | 0.00 | 47 | ||
| G2 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | n/a |
| Share of particular LSI in G2 (%) | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G2 (%) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | n/a | 0.0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| No of annulled decisions | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| Annulment rate | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| G3 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 2 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 42.9 |
| Share of particular LSI in G3 (%) | 8.7 | 30.4 | 47.8 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 8.7 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | n/a | 1 | 14 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G3 (%) | 7.1 | 28.6 | 50.0 | 7.1 | n/a | 7.1 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | 25.0 | 5.9 | 35.0 | 20.0 | n/a | 16.7 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 6 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | 0 | 25 | 71 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 43 | ||
| G4 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 35.3 |
| Share of particular LSI in G4 (%) | 0.0 | 7.1 | 53.6 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 14.3 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | n/a | 1 | 9 | 4 | n/a | 3 | 17 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G4 (%) | n/a | 5.9 | 52.9 | 23.5 | n/a | 17.6 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | n/a | 1.5 | 45.0 | 80.0 | n/a | 50.0 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | n/a | 0 | 3 | 2 | n/a | 1 | 6 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | n/a | 0 | 33 | 50 | n/a | 33 | 35 | ||
| Total No of decisions (shares %) corresponding to each LSI | 5 (3.6) | 86 (61.4) | 32 (22.9) | 8 (5.7) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (6.4) | 140 | ||
| Total No of appealed decisions (shares %) corresponding to each LSI | 4 (3.9) | 68 (66.0) | 20 (19.4) | 5 (4.9) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (5.8) | 103 | ||
| WAAR for each value of LSI (%) | 0.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 40.0 | n/a | 16.7 | |||
Notes: WAAR for each conduct group (last column), for example for G1, is given by the sum across LSI of the (Appeal rate across all LSI for G1) × (annulment rate), or equivalently, by dividing the total number of annulled G1 decisions (34) by the total number of appealed G1 decisions (72). In addition, the appeal rate across all LSI for example for G1 and LSI = 1, is (3/72) = 0.042. Accordingly, the appeal rate for each LSI across all groups for example for LSI = 1, is (3/4) = 0.75 (where 4 is the total number of appealed decisions across all groups with LSI = 1). Also, note that the number of appealed decisions does not include appealed decisions which are still in progress. Hence, for G1 and LSI = 2 there are 65 appealed decisions instead of 63 but 2 appealed decisions are still in progress so are not included here. For G1 and LSI = 3, there are 5 appealed decisions instead of 4 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G1 and LSI = 6, there are 3 appealed decisions instead of 2 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G2 and LSI = 2, there is 1 appealed decision instead of 0 but this appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G3 and LSI = 1, there are 2 appealed decisions instead of 1 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G4 and LSI = 4, there are 5 appealed decisions instead of 4 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G4 and LSI = 6, there are 4 appealed decisions instead of 3 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here.
Appeal and annulment rates and Weighted Average Annulment Rates (WAAR) for each LSI and conduct group. Table 9a. Scoring taking into account analysis under Article 101(3) (140 decisions)
| Conduct group . | . | LSI . | Total No . | WAAR for each conduct group (%) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 . | 2 . | 3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | ||||
| G1 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 3 | 74 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 86 | 47.2 |
| Share of particular LSI in G1 (%) | 3.5 | 86.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | 3 | 63 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 72 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G1 (%) | 4.2 | 87.5 | 5.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | 75.0 | 92.6 | 20.0 | 0.0 | n/a | 33.3 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | 0 | 33 | 1 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 34 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | 0 | 52 | 25 | n/a | n/a | 0.00 | 47 | ||
| G2 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | n/a |
| Share of particular LSI in G2 (%) | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G2 (%) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | n/a | 0.0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| No of annulled decisions | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| Annulment rate | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| G3 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 2 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 42.9 |
| Share of particular LSI in G3 (%) | 8.7 | 30.4 | 47.8 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 8.7 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | n/a | 1 | 14 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G3 (%) | 7.1 | 28.6 | 50.0 | 7.1 | n/a | 7.1 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | 25.0 | 5.9 | 35.0 | 20.0 | n/a | 16.7 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 6 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | 0 | 25 | 71 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 43 | ||
| G4 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 35.3 |
| Share of particular LSI in G4 (%) | 0.0 | 7.1 | 53.6 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 14.3 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | n/a | 1 | 9 | 4 | n/a | 3 | 17 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G4 (%) | n/a | 5.9 | 52.9 | 23.5 | n/a | 17.6 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | n/a | 1.5 | 45.0 | 80.0 | n/a | 50.0 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | n/a | 0 | 3 | 2 | n/a | 1 | 6 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | n/a | 0 | 33 | 50 | n/a | 33 | 35 | ||
| Total No of decisions (shares %) corresponding to each LSI | 5 (3.6) | 86 (61.4) | 32 (22.9) | 8 (5.7) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (6.4) | 140 | ||
| Total No of appealed decisions (shares %) corresponding to each LSI | 4 (3.9) | 68 (66.0) | 20 (19.4) | 5 (4.9) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (5.8) | 103 | ||
| WAAR for each value of LSI (%) | 0.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 40.0 | n/a | 16.7 | |||
| Conduct group . | . | LSI . | Total No . | WAAR for each conduct group (%) . | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 . | 2 . | 3 . | 4 . | 5 . | 6 . | ||||
| G1 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 3 | 74 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 86 | 47.2 |
| Share of particular LSI in G1 (%) | 3.5 | 86.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | 3 | 63 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 72 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G1 (%) | 4.2 | 87.5 | 5.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | 75.0 | 92.6 | 20.0 | 0.0 | n/a | 33.3 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | 0 | 33 | 1 | n/a | n/a | 0 | 34 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | 0 | 52 | 25 | n/a | n/a | 0.00 | 47 | ||
| G2 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | n/a |
| Share of particular LSI in G2 (%) | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | n/a | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G2 (%) | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | n/a | 0.0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| No of annulled decisions | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| Annulment rate | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
| G3 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 2 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 42.9 |
| Share of particular LSI in G3 (%) | 8.7 | 30.4 | 47.8 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 8.7 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | n/a | 1 | 14 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G3 (%) | 7.1 | 28.6 | 50.0 | 7.1 | n/a | 7.1 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | 25.0 | 5.9 | 35.0 | 20.0 | n/a | 16.7 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 6 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | 0 | 25 | 71 | 0 | n/a | 0 | 43 | ||
| G4 | No of decisions (without gaps) | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 35.3 |
| Share of particular LSI in G4 (%) | 0.0 | 7.1 | 53.6 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 14.3 | |||
| No of appealed decisions | n/a | 1 | 9 | 4 | n/a | 3 | 17 | ||
| Appeal rate across all LSI for G4 (%) | n/a | 5.9 | 52.9 | 23.5 | n/a | 17.6 | |||
| Appeal rate for each LSI across all groups (%) | n/a | 1.5 | 45.0 | 80.0 | n/a | 50.0 | |||
| No of annulled decisions | n/a | 0 | 3 | 2 | n/a | 1 | 6 | ||
| Annulment rate (%) | n/a | 0 | 33 | 50 | n/a | 33 | 35 | ||
| Total No of decisions (shares %) corresponding to each LSI | 5 (3.6) | 86 (61.4) | 32 (22.9) | 8 (5.7) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (6.4) | 140 | ||
| Total No of appealed decisions (shares %) corresponding to each LSI | 4 (3.9) | 68 (66.0) | 20 (19.4) | 5 (4.9) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (5.8) | 103 | ||
| WAAR for each value of LSI (%) | 0.0 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 40.0 | n/a | 16.7 | |||
Notes: WAAR for each conduct group (last column), for example for G1, is given by the sum across LSI of the (Appeal rate across all LSI for G1) × (annulment rate), or equivalently, by dividing the total number of annulled G1 decisions (34) by the total number of appealed G1 decisions (72). In addition, the appeal rate across all LSI for example for G1 and LSI = 1, is (3/72) = 0.042. Accordingly, the appeal rate for each LSI across all groups for example for LSI = 1, is (3/4) = 0.75 (where 4 is the total number of appealed decisions across all groups with LSI = 1). Also, note that the number of appealed decisions does not include appealed decisions which are still in progress. Hence, for G1 and LSI = 2 there are 65 appealed decisions instead of 63 but 2 appealed decisions are still in progress so are not included here. For G1 and LSI = 3, there are 5 appealed decisions instead of 4 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G1 and LSI = 6, there are 3 appealed decisions instead of 2 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G2 and LSI = 2, there is 1 appealed decision instead of 0 but this appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G3 and LSI = 1, there are 2 appealed decisions instead of 1 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G4 and LSI = 4, there are 5 appealed decisions instead of 4 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here. For G4 and LSI = 6, there are 4 appealed decisions instead of 3 but 1 appealed decision is still in progress so is not included here.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
