Table 2.

χ2 analyses examining the association of aac(6’)Ib-cr carriage with other different genotypic factors

aac(6’)Ib-cr carriage versus:χ2AssociationP
ST1316.2positive0.013
ST11934.3negative0.038
ST381.9positive0.17
blaCTX-M-15 carriage47.8positive<0.0001
blaCTX-M-27 carriage5.0negative0.025
QRDR type A8.7positive0.003
QRDR type B3.5negative0.060
QRDR type C3.0negative0.083
aac(6’)Ib-cr carriage versus:χ2AssociationP
ST1316.2positive0.013
ST11934.3negative0.038
ST381.9positive0.17
blaCTX-M-15 carriage47.8positive<0.0001
blaCTX-M-27 carriage5.0negative0.025
QRDR type A8.7positive0.003
QRDR type B3.5negative0.060
QRDR type C3.0negative0.083

All comparisons had degrees of freedom = 1.

Table 2.

χ2 analyses examining the association of aac(6’)Ib-cr carriage with other different genotypic factors

aac(6’)Ib-cr carriage versus:χ2AssociationP
ST1316.2positive0.013
ST11934.3negative0.038
ST381.9positive0.17
blaCTX-M-15 carriage47.8positive<0.0001
blaCTX-M-27 carriage5.0negative0.025
QRDR type A8.7positive0.003
QRDR type B3.5negative0.060
QRDR type C3.0negative0.083
aac(6’)Ib-cr carriage versus:χ2AssociationP
ST1316.2positive0.013
ST11934.3negative0.038
ST381.9positive0.17
blaCTX-M-15 carriage47.8positive<0.0001
blaCTX-M-27 carriage5.0negative0.025
QRDR type A8.7positive0.003
QRDR type B3.5negative0.060
QRDR type C3.0negative0.083

All comparisons had degrees of freedom = 1.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close