| . | AVR neglected (122 patients) . | AVR performed (61 patients) . | P-value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| MV repair (n, %) | 53 (43) | 23 (37) | 0.66 |
| MV replacement (n, %) | 69 (57) | 38 (61) | 0.54 |
| Mechanical prosthesis (n, %) | 33 (48) | 26 (68) | 0.034 |
| Biological prosthesis (n, %) | 36 (52) | 12 (32) | 0.15 |
| AV replacement | |||
| Mechanical prosthesis (n, %) | 30 (49) | ||
| Biologic prosthesis (n, %) | 31 (51) | ||
| Mitral prosthesis size, mm (mean ± SD) | 28.13 ± 2.15 | 28.10 ± 1.9 | 0.93 |
| Aortic prosthesis size, mm (mean ± SD) | 22.57 ± 2.19 | ||
| Concomitant procedures | 78 (64) | 36 (59) | 0.52 |
| TV repair (n, %) | 57 (47) | 25 (40) | 0.46 |
| TV replacement (n, %) | 3 (2) | 0 | 0.22 |
| Cox-maze procedure (n, %) | 41 (34) | 21 (34) | 0.91 |
| CABG (n, %) | 8 (6) | 4 (6) | 0.99 |
| . | AVR neglected (122 patients) . | AVR performed (61 patients) . | P-value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| MV repair (n, %) | 53 (43) | 23 (37) | 0.66 |
| MV replacement (n, %) | 69 (57) | 38 (61) | 0.54 |
| Mechanical prosthesis (n, %) | 33 (48) | 26 (68) | 0.034 |
| Biological prosthesis (n, %) | 36 (52) | 12 (32) | 0.15 |
| AV replacement | |||
| Mechanical prosthesis (n, %) | 30 (49) | ||
| Biologic prosthesis (n, %) | 31 (51) | ||
| Mitral prosthesis size, mm (mean ± SD) | 28.13 ± 2.15 | 28.10 ± 1.9 | 0.93 |
| Aortic prosthesis size, mm (mean ± SD) | 22.57 ± 2.19 | ||
| Concomitant procedures | 78 (64) | 36 (59) | 0.52 |
| TV repair (n, %) | 57 (47) | 25 (40) | 0.46 |
| TV replacement (n, %) | 3 (2) | 0 | 0.22 |
| Cox-maze procedure (n, %) | 41 (34) | 21 (34) | 0.91 |
| CABG (n, %) | 8 (6) | 4 (6) | 0.99 |
AV: aortic valve; AVR: aortic valve replacement; CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; MV: mitral valve; SD: standard deviation; TV: tricuspid valve.
| . | AVR neglected (122 patients) . | AVR performed (61 patients) . | P-value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| MV repair (n, %) | 53 (43) | 23 (37) | 0.66 |
| MV replacement (n, %) | 69 (57) | 38 (61) | 0.54 |
| Mechanical prosthesis (n, %) | 33 (48) | 26 (68) | 0.034 |
| Biological prosthesis (n, %) | 36 (52) | 12 (32) | 0.15 |
| AV replacement | |||
| Mechanical prosthesis (n, %) | 30 (49) | ||
| Biologic prosthesis (n, %) | 31 (51) | ||
| Mitral prosthesis size, mm (mean ± SD) | 28.13 ± 2.15 | 28.10 ± 1.9 | 0.93 |
| Aortic prosthesis size, mm (mean ± SD) | 22.57 ± 2.19 | ||
| Concomitant procedures | 78 (64) | 36 (59) | 0.52 |
| TV repair (n, %) | 57 (47) | 25 (40) | 0.46 |
| TV replacement (n, %) | 3 (2) | 0 | 0.22 |
| Cox-maze procedure (n, %) | 41 (34) | 21 (34) | 0.91 |
| CABG (n, %) | 8 (6) | 4 (6) | 0.99 |
| . | AVR neglected (122 patients) . | AVR performed (61 patients) . | P-value . |
|---|---|---|---|
| MV repair (n, %) | 53 (43) | 23 (37) | 0.66 |
| MV replacement (n, %) | 69 (57) | 38 (61) | 0.54 |
| Mechanical prosthesis (n, %) | 33 (48) | 26 (68) | 0.034 |
| Biological prosthesis (n, %) | 36 (52) | 12 (32) | 0.15 |
| AV replacement | |||
| Mechanical prosthesis (n, %) | 30 (49) | ||
| Biologic prosthesis (n, %) | 31 (51) | ||
| Mitral prosthesis size, mm (mean ± SD) | 28.13 ± 2.15 | 28.10 ± 1.9 | 0.93 |
| Aortic prosthesis size, mm (mean ± SD) | 22.57 ± 2.19 | ||
| Concomitant procedures | 78 (64) | 36 (59) | 0.52 |
| TV repair (n, %) | 57 (47) | 25 (40) | 0.46 |
| TV replacement (n, %) | 3 (2) | 0 | 0.22 |
| Cox-maze procedure (n, %) | 41 (34) | 21 (34) | 0.91 |
| CABG (n, %) | 8 (6) | 4 (6) | 0.99 |
AV: aortic valve; AVR: aortic valve replacement; CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; MV: mitral valve; SD: standard deviation; TV: tricuspid valve.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
