Table 1.

Discordant results between 582 paired molecular tests with interpretable results performed for assessment of rifampicin-resistant TB at routine laboratories in South Africa

Test and resultsSample pairsaProportion (95% CI)
Xpert and MTBDRplus (n=297)
 concordant RIFR25485.5% (81.1%–89.1%)
 concordant RIFS00%
 Xpert RIFS MTBDRplus RIFR10.4% (0.06%–1.9%)
 Xpert RIFR MTBDRplus RIFS4214.1% (10.6%–18.6%)
Repeat Xpert (n=72)
 concordant RIFR6894.4% (86.6%–97.8%)
 concordant RIFS00%
 discordant45.6% (2.2%–13.4%)
Repeat MTBDRplus (n=213)
 concordant RIFR19491.1% (86.5%–94.2%)
 concordant RIFS104.7% (2.6%–8.4%)
 discordant94.2% (2.2%–7.8%)
Test and resultsSample pairsaProportion (95% CI)
Xpert and MTBDRplus (n=297)
 concordant RIFR25485.5% (81.1%–89.1%)
 concordant RIFS00%
 Xpert RIFS MTBDRplus RIFR10.4% (0.06%–1.9%)
 Xpert RIFR MTBDRplus RIFS4214.1% (10.6%–18.6%)
Repeat Xpert (n=72)
 concordant RIFR6894.4% (86.6%–97.8%)
 concordant RIFS00%
 discordant45.6% (2.2%–13.4%)
Repeat MTBDRplus (n=213)
 concordant RIFR19491.1% (86.5%–94.2%)
 concordant RIFS104.7% (2.6%–8.4%)
 discordant94.2% (2.2%–7.8%)

RIFR, rifampicin resistant; RIFS, rifampicin susceptible.

a

Samples included in the sample pairs were collected on different dates. The number of sample pairs included in the Xpert versus MTBDRplus, repeat Xpert and repeat MTBDRplus analyses differed, depending on which tests were requested by the clinician in charge of patient care.

Table 1.

Discordant results between 582 paired molecular tests with interpretable results performed for assessment of rifampicin-resistant TB at routine laboratories in South Africa

Test and resultsSample pairsaProportion (95% CI)
Xpert and MTBDRplus (n=297)
 concordant RIFR25485.5% (81.1%–89.1%)
 concordant RIFS00%
 Xpert RIFS MTBDRplus RIFR10.4% (0.06%–1.9%)
 Xpert RIFR MTBDRplus RIFS4214.1% (10.6%–18.6%)
Repeat Xpert (n=72)
 concordant RIFR6894.4% (86.6%–97.8%)
 concordant RIFS00%
 discordant45.6% (2.2%–13.4%)
Repeat MTBDRplus (n=213)
 concordant RIFR19491.1% (86.5%–94.2%)
 concordant RIFS104.7% (2.6%–8.4%)
 discordant94.2% (2.2%–7.8%)
Test and resultsSample pairsaProportion (95% CI)
Xpert and MTBDRplus (n=297)
 concordant RIFR25485.5% (81.1%–89.1%)
 concordant RIFS00%
 Xpert RIFS MTBDRplus RIFR10.4% (0.06%–1.9%)
 Xpert RIFR MTBDRplus RIFS4214.1% (10.6%–18.6%)
Repeat Xpert (n=72)
 concordant RIFR6894.4% (86.6%–97.8%)
 concordant RIFS00%
 discordant45.6% (2.2%–13.4%)
Repeat MTBDRplus (n=213)
 concordant RIFR19491.1% (86.5%–94.2%)
 concordant RIFS104.7% (2.6%–8.4%)
 discordant94.2% (2.2%–7.8%)

RIFR, rifampicin resistant; RIFS, rifampicin susceptible.

a

Samples included in the sample pairs were collected on different dates. The number of sample pairs included in the Xpert versus MTBDRplus, repeat Xpert and repeat MTBDRplus analyses differed, depending on which tests were requested by the clinician in charge of patient care.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close