Table 5

The capacity of models using purely clinical findings and inflammatory markers (A) or both clinical findings and TA-MRA (B) to rule in or rule out a diagnosis of GCA using various descending probabilities to rule out a diagnosis of GCA and ascending probabilities to rule in a diagnosis of GCA using the models in Table 3

Rule OUT GCAIdealRule IN GCA
(A) Predicting GCA using clinical parameters
p≤0.10≤0.250.364≥0.50≥0.75≥0.90
Sensitivity (%)98.289.371.450.020.52.7
Specificity (%)7.043.964.983.096.5100
PPV (%)40.951.057.165.979.3100
NPV (%)85.786.277.671.765.061.1
MCR (%)56.938.131.830.033.638.5
(B) Predicting GCA using clinical parameters and TA-MRA
p≤0.10≤0.250.301≥0.50≥0.75≥0.90
Sensitivity (%)98.076.269.362.352.410.9
Specificity (%)13.171.482.191.795.299.4
PPV (%)40.461.670.081.886.991.7
NPV (%)91.783.381.780.276.965.0
MCR (%)55.026.722.319.320.833.8
Rule OUT GCAIdealRule IN GCA
(A) Predicting GCA using clinical parameters
p≤0.10≤0.250.364≥0.50≥0.75≥0.90
Sensitivity (%)98.289.371.450.020.52.7
Specificity (%)7.043.964.983.096.5100
PPV (%)40.951.057.165.979.3100
NPV (%)85.786.277.671.765.061.1
MCR (%)56.938.131.830.033.638.5
(B) Predicting GCA using clinical parameters and TA-MRA
p≤0.10≤0.250.301≥0.50≥0.75≥0.90
Sensitivity (%)98.076.269.362.352.410.9
Specificity (%)13.171.482.191.795.299.4
PPV (%)40.461.670.081.886.991.7
NPV (%)91.783.381.780.276.965.0
MCR (%)55.026.722.319.320.833.8

The calculated probability is the Unal cut-off point. PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; MCR: misclassification rate.

Table 5

The capacity of models using purely clinical findings and inflammatory markers (A) or both clinical findings and TA-MRA (B) to rule in or rule out a diagnosis of GCA using various descending probabilities to rule out a diagnosis of GCA and ascending probabilities to rule in a diagnosis of GCA using the models in Table 3

Rule OUT GCAIdealRule IN GCA
(A) Predicting GCA using clinical parameters
p≤0.10≤0.250.364≥0.50≥0.75≥0.90
Sensitivity (%)98.289.371.450.020.52.7
Specificity (%)7.043.964.983.096.5100
PPV (%)40.951.057.165.979.3100
NPV (%)85.786.277.671.765.061.1
MCR (%)56.938.131.830.033.638.5
(B) Predicting GCA using clinical parameters and TA-MRA
p≤0.10≤0.250.301≥0.50≥0.75≥0.90
Sensitivity (%)98.076.269.362.352.410.9
Specificity (%)13.171.482.191.795.299.4
PPV (%)40.461.670.081.886.991.7
NPV (%)91.783.381.780.276.965.0
MCR (%)55.026.722.319.320.833.8
Rule OUT GCAIdealRule IN GCA
(A) Predicting GCA using clinical parameters
p≤0.10≤0.250.364≥0.50≥0.75≥0.90
Sensitivity (%)98.289.371.450.020.52.7
Specificity (%)7.043.964.983.096.5100
PPV (%)40.951.057.165.979.3100
NPV (%)85.786.277.671.765.061.1
MCR (%)56.938.131.830.033.638.5
(B) Predicting GCA using clinical parameters and TA-MRA
p≤0.10≤0.250.301≥0.50≥0.75≥0.90
Sensitivity (%)98.076.269.362.352.410.9
Specificity (%)13.171.482.191.795.299.4
PPV (%)40.461.670.081.886.991.7
NPV (%)91.783.381.780.276.965.0
MCR (%)55.026.722.319.320.833.8

The calculated probability is the Unal cut-off point. PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; MCR: misclassification rate.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close