Table 4.

Characteristics of the Patients Who Were Referred for a Neuropsychological Evaluation and Characteristics of Those Who Participated in DTH-TNP

Virtual, n (%)In-person, n (%)
Patient characteristics by visit type (N = 119)
Evaluations 79 (66)40 (34)
Diagnosisa
 High-grade primary brain tumor18 (23)6 (15)
 Low-grade primary brain tumor18 (23)14 (35)
 Brain metastases8 (10)2 (5)
 Non-CNS Ca/NTX22 (28)12 (30)
 CNS lymphoma6 (8)3 (8)
 Brain mass of unknown etiology5 (6)0
 Other2 (3)3 (8)
Reason for referrala
 New mass/lesion/preoperative evaluation7 (9)0
 Baseline prior to Tx (chemo, radiation)12 (15)4 (10)
 Cognitive concerns60 (76)36 (90)
Prior neuropsychological evaluation?b
 No59 (75)23 (58)
 Yes 20 (25)17 (43)
Characteristics of DTH-TNP patients (n = 79)
Age: median (range)59 (21-81)
Sex: n (%)
 Male38 (48)
 Female41 (52)
Highest education achieved: median (range)16 (10-20)
 High school (0-12)14 (18)
 Associate’s degree (13-15 y)16 (20)
 Bachelor’s degree26 (33)
 Graduate school (17-20+ y)23 (29)
KPS at time of evaluation: n (%)
 504 (5)
 6016 (20)
 709 (11)
 8025 (32)
 9022 (28)
 1003 (4)
Treatment typec: n (%)
 Neurosurgery47 (59)
 Brain radiation35 (44)
 Chemotherapy56 (71)
 No treatment4 (5)
Brain tumor patients (n = 58)
Hemisphere: n (%)
 Left19 (33)
 Right19 (33)
 Bilateral20 (34)
Tumor region: n (%)
 Frontal16 (28)
 Temporal12 (21)
 Parietal2 (3)
 Subcortical5 (9)
 Multifocal20 (34)
 Cerebellar3 (5)
Virtual, n (%)In-person, n (%)
Patient characteristics by visit type (N = 119)
Evaluations 79 (66)40 (34)
Diagnosisa
 High-grade primary brain tumor18 (23)6 (15)
 Low-grade primary brain tumor18 (23)14 (35)
 Brain metastases8 (10)2 (5)
 Non-CNS Ca/NTX22 (28)12 (30)
 CNS lymphoma6 (8)3 (8)
 Brain mass of unknown etiology5 (6)0
 Other2 (3)3 (8)
Reason for referrala
 New mass/lesion/preoperative evaluation7 (9)0
 Baseline prior to Tx (chemo, radiation)12 (15)4 (10)
 Cognitive concerns60 (76)36 (90)
Prior neuropsychological evaluation?b
 No59 (75)23 (58)
 Yes 20 (25)17 (43)
Characteristics of DTH-TNP patients (n = 79)
Age: median (range)59 (21-81)
Sex: n (%)
 Male38 (48)
 Female41 (52)
Highest education achieved: median (range)16 (10-20)
 High school (0-12)14 (18)
 Associate’s degree (13-15 y)16 (20)
 Bachelor’s degree26 (33)
 Graduate school (17-20+ y)23 (29)
KPS at time of evaluation: n (%)
 504 (5)
 6016 (20)
 709 (11)
 8025 (32)
 9022 (28)
 1003 (4)
Treatment typec: n (%)
 Neurosurgery47 (59)
 Brain radiation35 (44)
 Chemotherapy56 (71)
 No treatment4 (5)
Brain tumor patients (n = 58)
Hemisphere: n (%)
 Left19 (33)
 Right19 (33)
 Bilateral20 (34)
Tumor region: n (%)
 Frontal16 (28)
 Temporal12 (21)
 Parietal2 (3)
 Subcortical5 (9)
 Multifocal20 (34)
 Cerebellar3 (5)

Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system; DTH-TNP, direct-to-home-teleneuropsychology; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status.

aNot significantly different.

bMarginally significant difference (P = .056).

cPatients may have had more than one treatment type.

Table 4.

Characteristics of the Patients Who Were Referred for a Neuropsychological Evaluation and Characteristics of Those Who Participated in DTH-TNP

Virtual, n (%)In-person, n (%)
Patient characteristics by visit type (N = 119)
Evaluations 79 (66)40 (34)
Diagnosisa
 High-grade primary brain tumor18 (23)6 (15)
 Low-grade primary brain tumor18 (23)14 (35)
 Brain metastases8 (10)2 (5)
 Non-CNS Ca/NTX22 (28)12 (30)
 CNS lymphoma6 (8)3 (8)
 Brain mass of unknown etiology5 (6)0
 Other2 (3)3 (8)
Reason for referrala
 New mass/lesion/preoperative evaluation7 (9)0
 Baseline prior to Tx (chemo, radiation)12 (15)4 (10)
 Cognitive concerns60 (76)36 (90)
Prior neuropsychological evaluation?b
 No59 (75)23 (58)
 Yes 20 (25)17 (43)
Characteristics of DTH-TNP patients (n = 79)
Age: median (range)59 (21-81)
Sex: n (%)
 Male38 (48)
 Female41 (52)
Highest education achieved: median (range)16 (10-20)
 High school (0-12)14 (18)
 Associate’s degree (13-15 y)16 (20)
 Bachelor’s degree26 (33)
 Graduate school (17-20+ y)23 (29)
KPS at time of evaluation: n (%)
 504 (5)
 6016 (20)
 709 (11)
 8025 (32)
 9022 (28)
 1003 (4)
Treatment typec: n (%)
 Neurosurgery47 (59)
 Brain radiation35 (44)
 Chemotherapy56 (71)
 No treatment4 (5)
Brain tumor patients (n = 58)
Hemisphere: n (%)
 Left19 (33)
 Right19 (33)
 Bilateral20 (34)
Tumor region: n (%)
 Frontal16 (28)
 Temporal12 (21)
 Parietal2 (3)
 Subcortical5 (9)
 Multifocal20 (34)
 Cerebellar3 (5)
Virtual, n (%)In-person, n (%)
Patient characteristics by visit type (N = 119)
Evaluations 79 (66)40 (34)
Diagnosisa
 High-grade primary brain tumor18 (23)6 (15)
 Low-grade primary brain tumor18 (23)14 (35)
 Brain metastases8 (10)2 (5)
 Non-CNS Ca/NTX22 (28)12 (30)
 CNS lymphoma6 (8)3 (8)
 Brain mass of unknown etiology5 (6)0
 Other2 (3)3 (8)
Reason for referrala
 New mass/lesion/preoperative evaluation7 (9)0
 Baseline prior to Tx (chemo, radiation)12 (15)4 (10)
 Cognitive concerns60 (76)36 (90)
Prior neuropsychological evaluation?b
 No59 (75)23 (58)
 Yes 20 (25)17 (43)
Characteristics of DTH-TNP patients (n = 79)
Age: median (range)59 (21-81)
Sex: n (%)
 Male38 (48)
 Female41 (52)
Highest education achieved: median (range)16 (10-20)
 High school (0-12)14 (18)
 Associate’s degree (13-15 y)16 (20)
 Bachelor’s degree26 (33)
 Graduate school (17-20+ y)23 (29)
KPS at time of evaluation: n (%)
 504 (5)
 6016 (20)
 709 (11)
 8025 (32)
 9022 (28)
 1003 (4)
Treatment typec: n (%)
 Neurosurgery47 (59)
 Brain radiation35 (44)
 Chemotherapy56 (71)
 No treatment4 (5)
Brain tumor patients (n = 58)
Hemisphere: n (%)
 Left19 (33)
 Right19 (33)
 Bilateral20 (34)
Tumor region: n (%)
 Frontal16 (28)
 Temporal12 (21)
 Parietal2 (3)
 Subcortical5 (9)
 Multifocal20 (34)
 Cerebellar3 (5)

Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system; DTH-TNP, direct-to-home-teleneuropsychology; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status.

aNot significantly different.

bMarginally significant difference (P = .056).

cPatients may have had more than one treatment type.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close