. | Patient 1 . | Patient 2 . | Patient 3 . | Patient 4 . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Female | Female | Male | Male |
Years of education | 17 | 5 | 13 | 8 |
Testing day after stroke | 77 | 40 | 40 | 62 |
Figure description | 6/10 | 2/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 |
Word naming | 35/40 | 24/40 | 1/40 | 15/40 |
Verb naming | 12/20 | 8/20 | 0/20 | 1/20 |
Word comprehension | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 |
Semantically related word comprehension | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 | 39/40 |
Sentence comprehension | 20/20 | 20/20 | 20/20 | 19/20 |
Word repetition | 36/40 | 19/40 | 0/40 | 13/40 |
Nonword repetition | 29/40 | 16/40 | 0/40 | 13/40 |
Sentence repetition | 11/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 |
Orofacial apraxia (cut-off = 16.9) | 17/20 | 18.25/20 | 20/20 | 18.25/20 |
Ideomotor apraxia (cut-off =16) | 20/20 | 17.25/20 | 20/20 | 18.25/20 |
Token Test (cut-off = 26.5) | 30.75/36 | 28.5/36 | — | 28.25/36 |
. | Patient 1 . | Patient 2 . | Patient 3 . | Patient 4 . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Female | Female | Male | Male |
Years of education | 17 | 5 | 13 | 8 |
Testing day after stroke | 77 | 40 | 40 | 62 |
Figure description | 6/10 | 2/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 |
Word naming | 35/40 | 24/40 | 1/40 | 15/40 |
Verb naming | 12/20 | 8/20 | 0/20 | 1/20 |
Word comprehension | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 |
Semantically related word comprehension | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 | 39/40 |
Sentence comprehension | 20/20 | 20/20 | 20/20 | 19/20 |
Word repetition | 36/40 | 19/40 | 0/40 | 13/40 |
Nonword repetition | 29/40 | 16/40 | 0/40 | 13/40 |
Sentence repetition | 11/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 |
Orofacial apraxia (cut-off = 16.9) | 17/20 | 18.25/20 | 20/20 | 18.25/20 |
Ideomotor apraxia (cut-off =16) | 20/20 | 17.25/20 | 20/20 | 18.25/20 |
Token Test (cut-off = 26.5) | 30.75/36 | 28.5/36 | — | 28.25/36 |
Note: Scores indicating impairment are in italics in Table 1. The cut-off score indicates the minimum overall score on the full test for performance to be considered in the normal range. The first nine tests listed above are from the battery Esame del Linguaggio II (Examination of Language II; Ciurli et al. 1996). The Orofacial Apraxia Test, the Ideomotor Apraxia Test, and the Token Test are presented by Spinnler and Tognoni (1987). These tests are described in the Materials and Methods section.
. | Patient 1 . | Patient 2 . | Patient 3 . | Patient 4 . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Female | Female | Male | Male |
Years of education | 17 | 5 | 13 | 8 |
Testing day after stroke | 77 | 40 | 40 | 62 |
Figure description | 6/10 | 2/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 |
Word naming | 35/40 | 24/40 | 1/40 | 15/40 |
Verb naming | 12/20 | 8/20 | 0/20 | 1/20 |
Word comprehension | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 |
Semantically related word comprehension | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 | 39/40 |
Sentence comprehension | 20/20 | 20/20 | 20/20 | 19/20 |
Word repetition | 36/40 | 19/40 | 0/40 | 13/40 |
Nonword repetition | 29/40 | 16/40 | 0/40 | 13/40 |
Sentence repetition | 11/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 |
Orofacial apraxia (cut-off = 16.9) | 17/20 | 18.25/20 | 20/20 | 18.25/20 |
Ideomotor apraxia (cut-off =16) | 20/20 | 17.25/20 | 20/20 | 18.25/20 |
Token Test (cut-off = 26.5) | 30.75/36 | 28.5/36 | — | 28.25/36 |
. | Patient 1 . | Patient 2 . | Patient 3 . | Patient 4 . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Female | Female | Male | Male |
Years of education | 17 | 5 | 13 | 8 |
Testing day after stroke | 77 | 40 | 40 | 62 |
Figure description | 6/10 | 2/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 |
Word naming | 35/40 | 24/40 | 1/40 | 15/40 |
Verb naming | 12/20 | 8/20 | 0/20 | 1/20 |
Word comprehension | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 |
Semantically related word comprehension | 40/40 | 40/40 | 40/40 | 39/40 |
Sentence comprehension | 20/20 | 20/20 | 20/20 | 19/20 |
Word repetition | 36/40 | 19/40 | 0/40 | 13/40 |
Nonword repetition | 29/40 | 16/40 | 0/40 | 13/40 |
Sentence repetition | 11/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 | 0/20 |
Orofacial apraxia (cut-off = 16.9) | 17/20 | 18.25/20 | 20/20 | 18.25/20 |
Ideomotor apraxia (cut-off =16) | 20/20 | 17.25/20 | 20/20 | 18.25/20 |
Token Test (cut-off = 26.5) | 30.75/36 | 28.5/36 | — | 28.25/36 |
Note: Scores indicating impairment are in italics in Table 1. The cut-off score indicates the minimum overall score on the full test for performance to be considered in the normal range. The first nine tests listed above are from the battery Esame del Linguaggio II (Examination of Language II; Ciurli et al. 1996). The Orofacial Apraxia Test, the Ideomotor Apraxia Test, and the Token Test are presented by Spinnler and Tognoni (1987). These tests are described in the Materials and Methods section.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
View Article Abstract & Purchase OptionsFor full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.