Table 2

Movie Differences Across Key Variables

Key variablesMRIBWCSBANOVA results
(n =46)(n =43)(n =42)(n =41)
Boundary expansion5.90a5.645.704.45aF(3, 168)=3.87, p < .05
(2.05)(1.84)(2.32)(2.43)
Transportation5.36a5.45b4.744.52a,bF(3, 168)=4.83, p < .01
(1.45)(1.09)(1.27)(1.58)
Identification5.21a,b5.46c,d4.28a,c3.92b,dF(3, 168)=9.09, p < .001
(1.12)(1.32)(1.85)(1.97)
Enjoyment4.914.20a,b5.68a5.35bF(3, 168)=7.16, p < .001
(1.62)(1.47)(1.42)(1.72)
Appreciation as moving/ thought-provoking5.52a,b5.44c,d3.81a,c3.54b,dF(3, 168)=19.72, p < .001
(1.37)(1.22)(1.87)(1.68)
Appreciation as lasting impression4.96a4.87b4.303.80a,bF(3, 168)=4.07, p < .01
(1.70)(1.54)(1.78)(1.99)
Finding positive meaning2.181.91a2.40a1.98F(3, 168)=3.88, p < .05
(0.83)(0.67)(0.53)(0.85)
Feeling moved3.65a3.192.902.33aF(3, 168)=5.55, p < .01
(1.69)(1.51)(1.67)(1.22)
Self-perceptual depth3.253.362.922.55F(3, 168)=1.88, n.s.
(1.82)(1.79)(1.71)(1.53)
Key variablesMRIBWCSBANOVA results
(n =46)(n =43)(n =42)(n =41)
Boundary expansion5.90a5.645.704.45aF(3, 168)=3.87, p < .05
(2.05)(1.84)(2.32)(2.43)
Transportation5.36a5.45b4.744.52a,bF(3, 168)=4.83, p < .01
(1.45)(1.09)(1.27)(1.58)
Identification5.21a,b5.46c,d4.28a,c3.92b,dF(3, 168)=9.09, p < .001
(1.12)(1.32)(1.85)(1.97)
Enjoyment4.914.20a,b5.68a5.35bF(3, 168)=7.16, p < .001
(1.62)(1.47)(1.42)(1.72)
Appreciation as moving/ thought-provoking5.52a,b5.44c,d3.81a,c3.54b,dF(3, 168)=19.72, p < .001
(1.37)(1.22)(1.87)(1.68)
Appreciation as lasting impression4.96a4.87b4.303.80a,bF(3, 168)=4.07, p < .01
(1.70)(1.54)(1.78)(1.99)
Finding positive meaning2.181.91a2.40a1.98F(3, 168)=3.88, p < .05
(0.83)(0.67)(0.53)(0.85)
Feeling moved3.65a3.192.902.33aF(3, 168)=5.55, p < .01
(1.69)(1.51)(1.67)(1.22)
Self-perceptual depth3.253.362.922.55F(3, 168)=1.88, n.s.
(1.82)(1.79)(1.71)(1.53)

Notes: MR refers to Mystic River (2003), IB is In the Bedroom (2001), WC is Wedding Crashers (2005), SB is Superbad (2007). Standard deviations are in parenthesis. Bonferroni pairwise comparisons were used. Means in each row that share the same subscript differ at p < .05 or better.

Table 2

Movie Differences Across Key Variables

Key variablesMRIBWCSBANOVA results
(n =46)(n =43)(n =42)(n =41)
Boundary expansion5.90a5.645.704.45aF(3, 168)=3.87, p < .05
(2.05)(1.84)(2.32)(2.43)
Transportation5.36a5.45b4.744.52a,bF(3, 168)=4.83, p < .01
(1.45)(1.09)(1.27)(1.58)
Identification5.21a,b5.46c,d4.28a,c3.92b,dF(3, 168)=9.09, p < .001
(1.12)(1.32)(1.85)(1.97)
Enjoyment4.914.20a,b5.68a5.35bF(3, 168)=7.16, p < .001
(1.62)(1.47)(1.42)(1.72)
Appreciation as moving/ thought-provoking5.52a,b5.44c,d3.81a,c3.54b,dF(3, 168)=19.72, p < .001
(1.37)(1.22)(1.87)(1.68)
Appreciation as lasting impression4.96a4.87b4.303.80a,bF(3, 168)=4.07, p < .01
(1.70)(1.54)(1.78)(1.99)
Finding positive meaning2.181.91a2.40a1.98F(3, 168)=3.88, p < .05
(0.83)(0.67)(0.53)(0.85)
Feeling moved3.65a3.192.902.33aF(3, 168)=5.55, p < .01
(1.69)(1.51)(1.67)(1.22)
Self-perceptual depth3.253.362.922.55F(3, 168)=1.88, n.s.
(1.82)(1.79)(1.71)(1.53)
Key variablesMRIBWCSBANOVA results
(n =46)(n =43)(n =42)(n =41)
Boundary expansion5.90a5.645.704.45aF(3, 168)=3.87, p < .05
(2.05)(1.84)(2.32)(2.43)
Transportation5.36a5.45b4.744.52a,bF(3, 168)=4.83, p < .01
(1.45)(1.09)(1.27)(1.58)
Identification5.21a,b5.46c,d4.28a,c3.92b,dF(3, 168)=9.09, p < .001
(1.12)(1.32)(1.85)(1.97)
Enjoyment4.914.20a,b5.68a5.35bF(3, 168)=7.16, p < .001
(1.62)(1.47)(1.42)(1.72)
Appreciation as moving/ thought-provoking5.52a,b5.44c,d3.81a,c3.54b,dF(3, 168)=19.72, p < .001
(1.37)(1.22)(1.87)(1.68)
Appreciation as lasting impression4.96a4.87b4.303.80a,bF(3, 168)=4.07, p < .01
(1.70)(1.54)(1.78)(1.99)
Finding positive meaning2.181.91a2.40a1.98F(3, 168)=3.88, p < .05
(0.83)(0.67)(0.53)(0.85)
Feeling moved3.65a3.192.902.33aF(3, 168)=5.55, p < .01
(1.69)(1.51)(1.67)(1.22)
Self-perceptual depth3.253.362.922.55F(3, 168)=1.88, n.s.
(1.82)(1.79)(1.71)(1.53)

Notes: MR refers to Mystic River (2003), IB is In the Bedroom (2001), WC is Wedding Crashers (2005), SB is Superbad (2007). Standard deviations are in parenthesis. Bonferroni pairwise comparisons were used. Means in each row that share the same subscript differ at p < .05 or better.

Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close